H-4319.1 _______________________________________________
HOUSE BILL 2769
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 54th Legislature 1996 Regular Session
By Representatives Pelesky, Poulsen and Brumsickle
Read first time 01/18/96. Referred to Committee on Education.
AN ACT Relating to certificated school employee evaluations; and amending RCW 28A.405.100.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 28A.405.100 and 1994 c 115 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The superintendent of public instruction shall establish and may amend from time to time minimum criteria for the evaluation of the professional performance capabilities and development of certificated classroom teachers and certificated support personnel. For classroom teachers the criteria shall be developed in the following categories: Instructional skill; classroom management, professional preparation and scholarship; effort toward improvement when needed; the handling of student discipline and attendant problems; and interest in teaching pupils and knowledge of subject matter.
Every board of directors shall, in accordance with procedure provided in RCW 41.59.010 through 41.59.170, 41.59.910 and 41.59.920, establish evaluative criteria and procedures for all certificated classroom teachers and certificated support personnel. The evaluative criteria must contain as a minimum the criteria established by the superintendent of public instruction pursuant to this section and must be prepared within six months following adoption of the superintendent of public instruction's minimum criteria. The district must certify to the superintendent of public instruction that evaluative criteria have been so prepared by the district.
Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, it shall be the responsibility of a principal or his or her designee to evaluate all certificated personnel in his or her school. During each school year all classroom teachers and certificated support personnel, hereinafter referred to as "employees" in this section, shall be observed for the purposes of evaluation at least twice in the performance of their assigned duties. Total observation time for each employee for each school year shall be not less than sixty minutes. Following each observation, or series of observations, the principal or other evaluator shall promptly document the results of the observation in writing, and shall provide the employee with a copy thereof within three days after such report is prepared. New employees shall be observed at least once for a total observation time of thirty minutes during the first ninety calendar days of their employment period.
((Every
employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory)) If it is found that an
employee is not effective based on district evaluation criteria, the
employee shall be notified in writing of stated specific areas of
deficiencies along with a suggested specific and reasonable program for
improvement on or before February 1st of each year. A probationary period
shall be established beginning on or before February 1st and ending no later
than May 1st. The purpose of the probationary period is to give the employee
opportunity to demonstrate improvements in his or her areas of deficiency. The
establishment of the probationary period and the giving of the notice to the
employee of deficiency shall be by the school district superintendent and need
not be submitted to the board of directors for approval. During the
probationary period the evaluator shall meet with the employee at least twice
monthly to supervise and make a written evaluation of the progress, if any,
made by the employee. The evaluator may authorize one additional certificated
employee to evaluate the probationer and to aid the employee in improving his
or her areas of deficiency; such additional certificated employee shall be
immune from any civil liability that might otherwise be incurred or imposed
with regard to the good faith performance of such evaluation. The probationer
may be removed from probation if he or she has demonstrated improvement to the
satisfaction of the principal in those areas specifically detailed in his or
her initial notice of deficiency and subsequently detailed in his or her
improvement program. Lack of necessary improvement shall be specifically
documented in writing with notification to the probationer and shall constitute
grounds for a finding of probable cause under RCW 28A.405.300 or 28A.405.210.
The establishment of a probationary period shall not be deemed to adversely affect the contract status of an employee within the meaning of RCW 28A.405.300.
(2) Every board of directors shall establish evaluative criteria and procedures for all superintendents, principals, and other administrators. It shall be the responsibility of the district superintendent or his or her designee to evaluate all administrators. Such evaluation shall be based on the administrative position job description. Such criteria, when applicable, shall include at least the following categories: Knowledge of, experience in, and training in recognizing good professional performance, capabilities and development; school administration and management; school finance; professional preparation and scholarship; effort toward improvement when needed; interest in pupils, employees, patrons and subjects taught in school; leadership; and ability and performance of evaluation of school personnel.
(3) Each certificated employee shall have the opportunity for confidential conferences with his or her immediate supervisor on no less than two occasions in each school year. Such confidential conference shall have as its sole purpose the aiding of the administrator in his or her assessment of the employee's professional performance.
(4) The failure of any evaluator to evaluate or supervise or cause the evaluation or supervision of certificated employees or administrators in accordance with this section, as now or hereafter amended, when it is his or her specific assigned or delegated responsibility to do so, shall be sufficient cause for the nonrenewal of any such evaluator's contract under RCW 28A.405.210, or the discharge of such evaluator under RCW 28A.405.300.
(5)
After an employee has four years of ((satisfactory))evaluations in
which the employee has been found to be effective under subsection (1) of
this section, a school district may use a short form of evaluation, a locally
bargained evaluation emphasizing professional growth, an evaluation under
subsection (1) of this section, or any combination thereof. The short form of
evaluation shall include either a thirty minute observation during the school
year with a written summary or a final annual written evaluation based on the
criteria in subsection (1) of this section and based on at least two
observation periods during the school year totaling at least sixty minutes
without a written summary of such observations being prepared. However, the
evaluation process set forth in subsection (1) of this section shall be
followed at least once every three years unless this time is extended by a
local school district under the bargaining process set forth in chapter 41.59
RCW. The employee or evaluator may require that the evaluation process set
forth in subsection (1) of this section be conducted in any given school year.
No evaluation other than the evaluation authorized under subsection (1) of this
section may be used as a basis for determining that an employee's work is ((unsatisfactory))
not effective under subsection (1) of this section or as probable cause
for the nonrenewal of an employee's contract under RCW 28A.405.210 unless an
evaluation process developed under chapter 41.59 RCW determines otherwise.