H-4921.1 _______________________________________________
SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2839
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 54th Legislature 1996 Regular Session
By House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Dyer, Sherstad, Thompson, McMahan, Goldsmith, Huff, Carlson, Robertson and Johnson)
Read first time 02/02/96.
AN ACT Relating to health care liability reform; amending RCW 5.60.060, 70.02.050, 4.16.190, 4.16.350, and 7.70.110; adding a new section to chapter 4.24 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 4.16 RCW; and creating new sections.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
PART 1--CERTIFICATE OF MERIT
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 4.24 RCW to read as follows:
(1) The claimant's attorney shall file the certificate specified in subsection (2) of this section within ninety days of filing or service, whichever occurs later, of any action for damages arising out of the negligence of a person licensed, registered, or certified under Title 18 RCW and subject to chapter 18.130 RCW or a health care facility as defined in RCW 48.43.005.
(2) The certificate issued by the claimant's attorney shall declare:
(a) That the attorney has reviewed the facts of the case;
(b) That the attorney has consulted with at least one qualified expert who the attorney reasonably believes is knowledgeable in the relevant issues involved in the particular action and who:
(i) Holds a license, certificate, or registration issued by this state or another state in the same profession as that of the defendant and who practices in the same specialty or subspecialty as the defendant; or
(ii) Has expertise in those areas requiring expert testimony in an action against a health care facility;
(c) The identity of the expert and the expert's license, certification, or registration;
(d) That the expert is willing and available to testify to admissible facts or opinions; and
(e) That the attorney has concluded on the basis of such review and consultation that there is reasonable and meritorious cause for the filing of such action.
(3) Where a certificate is required under this section, and where there are multiple defendants, the certificate or certificates must state the attorney's conclusion that on the basis of review and expert consultation, there is reasonable and meritorious cause for the filing of such action as to each defendant.
(4) The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to a pro se plaintiff until such a time as an attorney appears on the plaintiff's behalf.
(5) Violation of this section shall be grounds for either dismissal of the case or sanctions against the attorney, or both, as the court deems appropriate.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. Section 1 of this act applies to all actions for damages arising out of professional negligence filed on or after the effective date of this section.
PART 2--EQUAL ACCESS TO MEDICAL WITNESSES
Sec. 3. RCW 5.60.060 and 1995 c 240 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A husband shall not be examined for or against his wife, without the consent of the wife, nor a wife for or against her husband without the consent of the husband; nor can either during marriage or afterward, be without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during marriage. But this exception shall not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding against a spouse if the marriage occurred subsequent to the filing of formal charges against the defendant, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by said husband or wife against any child of whom said husband or wife is the parent or guardian, nor to a proceeding under chapter 70.96A or 71.05 RCW: PROVIDED, That the spouse of a person sought to be detained under chapter 70.96A or 71.05 RCW may not be compelled to testify and shall be so informed by the court prior to being called as a witness.
(2) An attorney or counselor shall not, without the consent of his or her client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to him or her, or his or her advice given thereon in the course of professional employment.
(3) A member of the clergy or a priest shall not, without the consent of a person making the confession, be examined as to any confession made to him or her in his or her professional character, in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which he or she belongs.
(4) Subject to the limitations under RCW 70.96A.140 or 71.05.250, a physician or surgeon or osteopathic physician or surgeon shall not, without the consent of his or her patient, be examined in a civil action as to any information acquired in attending such patient, which was necessary to enable him or her to prescribe or act for the patient, except as follows:
(a) In any judicial proceedings regarding a child's injury, neglect, or sexual abuse or the cause thereof; and
(b) ((Ninety)) One
hundred twenty days after filing an action for personal injuries or
wrongful death, the claimant shall be deemed to waive the physician-patient
privilege. Waiver of the physician-patient privilege for any one physician or
condition constitutes a waiver of the privilege as to all physicians or
conditions, subject to such limitations as a court may impose pursuant to court
rules. Where the privilege has been waived under this section, ex parte
interviews with such physicians may be conducted in the same manner as with any
other witness.
(5) A public officer shall not be examined as a witness as to communications made to him or her in official confidence, when the public interest would suffer by the disclosure.
(6)(a) A peer support group counselor shall not, without consent of the law enforcement officer making the communication, be compelled to testify about any communication made to the counselor by the officer while receiving counseling. The counselor must be designated as such by the sheriff, police chief, or chief of the Washington state patrol, prior to the incident that results in counseling. The privilege only applies when the communication was made to the counselor while acting in his or her capacity as a peer support group counselor. The privilege does not apply if the counselor was an initial responding officer, a witness, or a party to the incident which prompted the delivery of peer support group counseling services to the law enforcement officer.
(b) For purposes of this section, "peer support group counselor" means a:
(i) Law enforcement officer, or civilian employee of a law enforcement agency, who has received training to provide emotional and moral support and counseling to an officer who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the officer was involved while acting in his or her official capacity; or
(ii) Nonemployee counselor who has been designated by the sheriff, police chief, or chief of the Washington state patrol to provide emotional and moral support and counseling to an officer who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the officer was involved while acting in his or her official capacity.
Sec. 4. RCW 70.02.050 and 1993 c 448 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A health care provider may disclose health care information about a patient without the patient's authorization to the extent a recipient needs to know the information, if the disclosure is:
(a) To a person who the provider reasonably believes is providing health care to the patient;
(b) To any other person who requires health care information for health care education, or to provide planning, quality assurance, peer review, or administrative, legal, financial, or actuarial services to the health care provider; or for assisting the health care provider in the delivery of health care and the health care provider reasonably believes that the person:
(i) Will not use or disclose the health care information for any other purpose; and
(ii) Will take appropriate steps to protect the health care information;
(c) To any other health care provider reasonably believed to have previously provided health care to the patient, to the extent necessary to provide health care to the patient, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider in writing not to make the disclosure;
(d) To any person if the health care provider reasonably believes that disclosure will avoid or minimize an imminent danger to the health or safety of the patient or any other individual, however there is no obligation under this chapter on the part of the provider to so disclose;
(e) Oral, and made to immediate family members of the patient, or any other individual with whom the patient is known to have a close personal relationship, if made in accordance with good medical or other professional practice, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider in writing not to make the disclosure;
(f) To a health care provider who is the successor in interest to the health care provider maintaining the health care information;
(g) For use in a research project that an institutional review board has determined:
(i) Is of sufficient importance to outweigh the intrusion into the privacy of the patient that would result from the disclosure;
(ii) Is impracticable without the use or disclosure of the health care information in individually identifiable form;
(iii) Contains reasonable safeguards to protect the information from redisclosure;
(iv) Contains reasonable safeguards to protect against identifying, directly or indirectly, any patient in any report of the research project; and
(v) Contains procedures to remove or destroy at the earliest opportunity, consistent with the purposes of the project, information that would enable the patient to be identified, unless an institutional review board authorizes retention of identifying information for purposes of another research project;
(h) To a person who obtains information for purposes of an audit, if that person agrees in writing to:
(i) Remove or destroy, at the earliest opportunity consistent with the purpose of the audit, information that would enable the patient to be identified; and
(ii) Not to disclose the information further, except to accomplish the audit or report unlawful or improper conduct involving fraud in payment for health care by a health care provider or patient, or other unlawful conduct by the health care provider;
(i) To an official of a penal or other custodial institution in which the patient is detained;
(j) To provide directory information, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider not to make the disclosure;
(k) In the case of a hospital or health care provider to provide, in cases reported by fire, police, sheriff, or other public authority, name, residence, sex, age, occupation, condition, diagnosis, or extent and location of injuries as determined by a physician, and whether the patient was conscious when admitted; or
(l) Made after a deemed waiver of the physician-patient privilege under RCW 5.60.060(4)(b).
(2) A health care provider shall disclose health care information about a patient without the patient's authorization if the disclosure is:
(a) To federal, state, or local public health authorities, to the extent the health care provider is required by law to report health care information; when needed to determine compliance with state or federal licensure, certification or registration rules or laws; or when needed to protect the public health;
(b) To federal, state, or local law enforcement authorities to the extent the health care provider is required by law;
(c) Pursuant to compulsory process in accordance with RCW 70.02.060.
(3) All state or local agencies obtaining patient health care information pursuant to this section shall adopt rules establishing their record acquisition, retention, and security policies that are consistent with this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. Sections 3 and 4 of this act do not apply to claims, hearings, appeals, or any other proceedings under Title 51 RCW.
PART 3--LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
Sec. 6. RCW 4.16.190 and 1993 c 232 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
If a person entitled to bring an action mentioned in this chapter, except for a penalty or forfeiture, or against a sheriff or other officer, for an escape, be at the time the cause of action accrued either under the age of eighteen years, or incompetent or disabled to such a degree that he or she cannot understand the nature of the proceedings, such incompetency or disability as determined according to chapter 11.88 RCW, or imprisoned on a criminal charge prior to sentencing, the time of such disability shall not be a part of the time limited for the commencement of action.
This section does not apply to any civil action for damages for injury occurring as a result of health care.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 4.16 RCW to read as follows:
Any civil action for damages for injury occurring as a result of health care provided after June 25, 1976, and before the effective date of this act that has not accrued before the effective date of this act and that was previously tolled by RCW 4.16.190 accrues on the effective date of this act.
Sec. 8. RCW 4.16.350 and 1988 c 144 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
Any civil action for damages for injury occurring as a result of health care which is provided after June 25, 1976 against:
(1) A person licensed
by this state to provide health care or related services, including, but not
limited to, a physician, osteopathic physician, dentist, nurse, optometrist, ((podiatrist))
podiatric physician and surgeon, chiropractor, physical therapist,
psychologist, pharmacist, optician, physician's assistant, osteopathic
physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, or physician's trained mobile
intensive care paramedic, including, in the event such person is deceased, his
estate or personal representative;
(2) An employee or agent of a person described in subsection (1) of this section, acting in the course and scope of his employment, including, in the event such employee or agent is deceased, his estate or personal representative; or
(3) An entity, whether or not incorporated, facility, or institution employing one or more persons described in subsection (1) of this section, including, but not limited to, a hospital, clinic, health maintenance organization, or nursing home; or an officer, director, employee, or agent thereof acting in the course and scope of his employment, including, in the event such officer, director, employee, or agent is deceased, his estate or personal representative;
based upon alleged professional negligence shall be commenced within three years of the act or omission alleged to have caused the injury or condition, or one year of the time the patient or his representative discovered or reasonably should have discovered that the injury or condition was caused by said act or omission, whichever period expires later, except that in no event shall an action be commenced more than eight years after said act or omission: PROVIDED, That the time for commencement of an action is tolled upon proof of fraud, intentional concealment, or the presence of a foreign body not intended to have a therapeutic or diagnostic purpose or effect.
((For purposes of
this section, notwithstanding RCW 4.16.190, the knowledge of a custodial parent
or guardian shall be imputed to a person under the age of eighteen years, and
such imputed knowledge shall operate to bar the claim of such minor to the same
extent that the claim of an adult would be barred under this section. Any
action not commenced in accordance with this section shall be barred.
For purposes of this
section, with respect to care provided after June 25, 1976, and before August
1, 1986, the knowledge of a custodial parent or guardian shall be imputed as of
April 29, 1987, to persons under the age of eighteen years.))
This section does not apply to a civil action based on intentional conduct brought against those individuals or entities specified in this section by a person for recovery of damages for injury occurring as a result of childhood sexual abuse as defined in RCW 4.16.340(5).
PART 4--MANDATORY MEDIATION
Sec. 9. RCW 7.70.110 and 1993 c 492 s 420 are each amended to read as follows:
The making of a
written, good faith request for mediation of a dispute related to damages for
injury occurring as a result of health care ((provided)) prior to filing
a cause of action under this chapter shall toll the statute of limitations
provided in RCW 4.16.350 for six months.
PART 5--MISCELLANEOUS
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. Part headings used in this act do not constitute any part of the law.
--- END ---