_______________________________________________
ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2952
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 54th Legislature 1996 Regular Session
By Representatives Sheahan, Campbell, McMorris, Sterk, Sheldon, Hargrove, Schoesler, Foreman, Thompson, Hymes, Goldsmith, Pennington, L. Thomas, Smith, Backlund, Silver, Johnson, Carrell, Robertson, Blanton, Pelesky, Sherstad and Mulliken
Read first time 2-10-96.
AN ACT Relating to increasing penalties for crimes against family or household members; amending RCW 9A.36.050, 9A.36.070, 9A.46.110, 9A.52.070, 9A.48.090, 10.99.040, 26.09.300, and 26.50.110; creating a new section; and prescribing penalties.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 9A.36.050 and 1989 c 271 s 110 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the second degree when he recklessly engages in conduct not amounting to reckless endangerment in the first degree but which creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person.
(2) Reckless endangerment in the second degree is a gross misdemeanor unless the person commits the crime against a family or household member as defined in RCW 10.99.020, in which case it is a class C felony.
Sec. 2. RCW 9A.36.070 and 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 s 9A.36.070 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A person is guilty of coercion if by use of a threat he compels or induces a person to engage in conduct which the latter has a legal right to abstain from, or to abstain from conduct which he has a legal right to engage in.
(2) "Threat" as used in this section means:
(a) To communicate, directly or indirectly, the intent immediately to use force against any person who is present at the time; or
(b) Threats as defined in RCW 9A.04.110(25)(a), (b), or (c).
(3) Coercion is a gross misdemeanor unless the person commits the crime against a family or household member as defined in RCW 10.99.020, in which case it is a class C felony.
Sec. 3. RCW 9A.46.110 and 1994 c 271 s 801 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without lawful authority and under circumstances not amounting to a felony attempt of another crime:
(a) He or she intentionally and repeatedly harasses or repeatedly follows another person; and
(b) The person being harassed or followed is placed in fear that the stalker intends to injure the person, another person, or property of the person or of another person. The feeling of fear must be one that a reasonable person in the same situation would experience under all the circumstances; and
(c) The stalker either:
(i) Intends to frighten, intimidate, or harass the person; or
(ii) Knows or reasonably should know that the person is afraid, intimidated, or harassed even if the stalker did not intend to place the person in fear or intimidate or harass the person.
(2)(a) It is not a defense to the crime of stalking under subsection (1)(c)(i) of this section that the stalker was not given actual notice that the person did not want the stalker to contact or follow the person; and
(b) It is not a defense to the crime of stalking under subsection (1)(c)(ii) of this section that the stalker did not intend to frighten, intimidate, or harass the person.
(3) It shall be a
defense to the crime of stalking that the defendant is a licensed private ((detective))
investigator acting within the capacity of his or her license as
provided by chapter 18.165 RCW.
(4) Attempts to contact or follow the person after being given actual notice that the person does not want to be contacted or followed constitutes prima facie evidence that the stalker intends to intimidate or harass the person.
(5) A person who stalks
another person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor except that the person is
guilty of a class C felony if any of the following applies: (a) The stalker
has previously been convicted in this state or any other state of any crime of
harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, of the same victim or members of the
victim's family or household or any person specifically named in a protective
order; (b) the stalking violates any protective order protecting the person
being stalked; (c) the stalker has previously been convicted of a gross
misdemeanor or felony stalking offense under this section for stalking another
person; (d) the stalker was armed with a deadly weapon, as defined in RCW
9.94A.125, while stalking the person; (e) the stalker's victim is or was a law
enforcement officer, judge, juror, attorney, victim advocate, legislator, or
community correction's officer, and the stalker stalked the victim to retaliate
against the victim for an act the victim performed during the course of
official duties or to influence the victim's performance of official duties; ((or))
(f) the stalker's victim is a current, former, or prospective witness in an
adjudicative proceeding, and the stalker stalked the victim to retaliate
against the victim as a result of the victim's testimony or potential testimony;
or (g) the stalker's victim is a family or household member as defined in RCW
10.99.020.
(6) As used in this section:
(a) "Follows" means deliberately maintaining visual or physical proximity to a specific person over a period of time. A finding that the alleged stalker repeatedly and deliberately appears at the person's home, school, place of employment, business, or any other location to maintain visual or physical proximity to the person is sufficient to find that the alleged stalker follows the person. It is not necessary to establish that the alleged stalker follows the person while in transit from one location to another.
(b) "Harasses" means unlawful harassment as defined in RCW 10.14.020.
(c) "Protective order" means any temporary or permanent court order prohibiting or limiting violence against, harassment of, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to another person.
(d) "Repeatedly" means on two or more separate occasions.
Sec. 4. RCW 9A.52.070 and 1979 ex.s. c 244 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building.
(2) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a gross misdemeanor unless the person commits the crime against a family or household member as defined in RCW 10.99.020, in which case it is a class C felony.
Sec. 5. RCW 9A.48.090 and 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 s 9A.48.090 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A person is guilty of malicious mischief in the third degree if he knowingly and maliciously causes physical damage to the property of another, under circumstances not amounting to malicious mischief in the first or second degree.
(2) Malicious mischief in the third degree is a class C felony if the person commits the crime against a family or household member as defined in RCW 10.99.020 regardless of the cost of the damage to the property. If the crime is not committed against a family or household member malicious mischief in the third degree is a gross misdemeanor if the damage to the property is in an amount exceeding fifty dollars; otherwise, it is a misdemeanor.
Sec. 6. RCW 10.99.040 and 1995 c 246 s 23 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Because of the serious nature of domestic violence, the court in domestic violence actions:
(a) Shall not dismiss any charge or delay disposition because of concurrent dissolution or other civil proceedings;
(b) Shall not require proof that either party is seeking a dissolution of marriage prior to instigation of criminal proceedings;
(c) Shall waive any requirement that the victim's location be disclosed to any person, other than the attorney of a criminal defendant, upon a showing that there is a possibility of further violence: PROVIDED, That the court may order a criminal defense attorney not to disclose to his or her client the victim's location; and
(d) Shall identify by any reasonable means on docket sheets those criminal actions arising from acts of domestic violence.
(2) Because of the likelihood of repeated violence directed at those who have been victims of domestic violence in the past, when any person charged with or arrested for a crime involving domestic violence is released from custody before arraignment or trial on bail or personal recognizance, the court authorizing the release may prohibit that person from having any contact with the victim. The jurisdiction authorizing the release shall determine whether that person should be prohibited from having any contact with the victim. If there is no outstanding restraining or protective order prohibiting that person from having contact with the victim, the court authorizing release may issue, by telephone, a no-contact order prohibiting the person charged or arrested from having contact with the victim. In issuing the order, the court shall consider the provisions of RCW 9.41.800. The no-contact order shall also be issued in writing as soon as possible.
(3) At the time of arraignment the court shall determine whether a no-contact order shall be issued or extended. If a no-contact order is issued or extended, the court may also include in the conditions of release a requirement that the defendant submit to electronic monitoring. If electronic monitoring is ordered, the court shall specify who shall provide the monitoring services, and the terms under which the monitoring shall be performed. Upon conviction, the court may require as a condition of the sentence that the defendant reimburse the providing agency for the costs of the electronic monitoring.
(4)(a) Willful
violation of a court order issued under subsection (2) or (3) of this section
is a ((gross misdemeanor)) class C felony punishable under chapter
9A.20 RCW. Upon conviction and in addition to other penalties provided by
law, the court may require that the defendant submit to electronic monitoring.
The court shall specify who shall provide the electronic monitoring services
and the terms under which the monitoring must be performed. The court also may
include a requirement that the defendant pay the costs of the monitoring. The
court shall consider the ability of the convicted person to pay for electronic
monitoring.
(b) ((Any assault
that is a violation of an order issued under this section and that does not
amount to assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or
9A.36.021 is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW, and any
conduct in violation of a protective order issued under this section that is
reckless and creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to
another person is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
(c))) The written order releasing the person charged
or arrested shall contain the court's directives and shall bear the legend:
"Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 10.99 RCW and
will subject a violator to arrest; any assault or reckless endangerment that is
a violation of this order is a felony. You can be arrested even if any person
protected by the order invites or allows you to violate the order's
prohibitions. You have the sole responsibility to avoid or refrain from
violating the order's provisions. Only the court can change the order."
A certified copy of the order shall be provided to the victim. If a no-contact
order has been issued prior to charging, that order shall expire at arraignment
or within seventy-two hours if charges are not filed. Such orders need not be
entered into the computer-based criminal intelligence information system in this
state which is used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants.
(5) Whenever an order prohibiting contact is issued, modified, or terminated under subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order. Upon receipt of the copy of the order the law enforcement agency shall forthwith enter the order for one year or until the expiration date specified on the order into any computer-based criminal intelligence information system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants. Entry into the law enforcement information system constitutes notice to all law enforcement agencies of the existence of the order. The order is fully enforceable in any jurisdiction in the state.
Sec. 7. RCW 26.09.300 and 1995 c 246 s 27 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Whenever a
restraining order is issued under this chapter, and the person to be restrained
knows of the order, a violation of the provisions restricting the person from
acts or threats of violence or of a provision excluding the person from the
residence, workplace, school, or day care of another is a ((misdemeanor))
class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
(2) A person is deemed to have notice of a restraining order if:
(a) The person to be restrained or the person's attorney signed the order;
(b) The order recites that the person to be restrained or the person's attorney appeared in person before the court;
(c) The order was served upon the person to be restrained; or
(d) The peace officer gives the person oral or written evidence of the order by reading from it or handing to the person a certified copy of the original order, certified to be an accurate copy of the original by a notary public or by the clerk of the court.
(3) A peace officer shall verify the existence of a restraining order by:
(a) Obtaining information confirming the existence and terms of the order from a law enforcement agency; or
(b) Obtaining a certified copy of the order, certified to be an accurate copy of the original by a notary public or by the clerk of the court.
(4) A peace officer shall arrest and take into custody, pending release on bail, personal recognizance, or court order, a person without a warrant when the officer has probable cause to believe that:
(a) A restraining order has been issued under this chapter;
(b) The respondent or person to be restrained knows of the order; and
(c) The person to be arrested has violated the terms of the order restraining the person from acts or threats of violence or excluding the person from the residence.
(5) It is a defense to prosecution under subsection (1) of this section that the court order was issued contrary to law or court rule.
(6) No peace officer may be held criminally or civilly liable for making an arrest under subsection (4) of this section if the officer acts in good faith and without malice.
Sec. 8. RCW 26.50.110 and 1995 c 246 s 14 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Whenever an order
for protection is granted under this chapter and the respondent or person to be
restrained knows of the order, a violation of the restraint provisions or of a
provision excluding the person from a residence, workplace, school, or day care
is a ((gross misdemeanor)) class C felony. Upon conviction, and
in addition to any other penalties provided by law, the court may require that
the respondent submit to electronic monitoring. The court shall specify who
shall provide the electronic monitoring services, and the terms under which the
monitoring shall be performed. The order also may include a requirement that
the respondent pay the costs of the monitoring. The court shall consider the
ability of the convicted person to pay for electronic monitoring.
(2) A peace officer shall arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order issued under this chapter that restrains the person or excludes the person from a residence, workplace, school, or day care, if the person restrained knows of the order. Presence of the order in the law enforcement computer-based criminal intelligence information system is not the only means of establishing knowledge of the order.
(3) A violation of an order for protection shall also constitute contempt of court, and is subject to the penalties prescribed by law.
(4) ((Any assault
that is a violation of an order issued under this chapter and that does not
amount to assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or
9A.36.021 is a class C felony, and any conduct in violation of a protective
order issued under this chapter that is reckless and creates a substantial risk
of death or serious physical injury to another person is a class C felony.
(5))) Upon the filing of an affidavit by the
petitioner or any peace officer alleging that the respondent has violated an
order for protection granted under this chapter, the court may issue an order
to the respondent, requiring the respondent to appear and show cause within
fourteen days why the respondent should not be found in contempt of court and
punished accordingly. The hearing may be held in the court of any county or
municipality in which the petitioner or respondent temporarily or permanently
resides at the time of the alleged violation.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. If specific funding for the impact to superior courts and county jails of prosecuting crimes contained in this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 1996, in the supplemental omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.
--- END ---