Z-0297.2 _______________________________________________
SENATE BILL 5087
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 54th Legislature 1995 Regular Session
By Senator Fraser; by request of Environmental Hearings Office
Read first time 01/10/95. Referred to Committee on Ecology & Parks.
AN ACT Relating to appeals involving environmental and land use boards; amending RCW 43.21B.160, 43.21B.170, 43.21B.190, 90.58.180, 34.05.518, 34.05.522, and 75.20.140; and repealing RCW 43.21B.140 and 43.21B.150.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 43.21B.160 and 1990 c 65 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
In all appeals ((involving
a formal hearing)), the hearings board shall have all powers relating to
administration of oaths, issuance of subpoenas, and taking of depositions as
are granted to agencies in chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure
Act. The hearings board, and each member thereof, shall be subject to all
duties imposed upon, and shall have all powers granted to, an agency by those
provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW relating to adjudicative proceedings. In the
case of appeals within the jurisdiction of the hearings board, the hearings
board, or any member thereof, may obtain such assistance, including the making
of field investigations, from the staff of the director as the hearings board,
or any member thereof, may deem necessary or appropriate. Any communication,
oral or written, from the staff of the director to the hearings board shall be
presented only in an open hearing.
Sec. 2. RCW 43.21B.170 and 1970 ex.s. c 62 s 47 are each amended to read as follows:
All proceedings((,
including both formal and informal hearings,)) before the hearings board or
any of its members shall be conducted in accordance with such rules of practice
and procedure as the hearings board may prescribe. The hearings board shall
publish such rules and arrange for the reasonable distribution thereof.
Sec. 3. RCW 43.21B.190 and 1994 c 253 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:
Within thirty days
after the final decision and order of the hearings board upon such an appeal
has been communicated to the interested parties, such interested party
aggrieved by the decision and order of the hearings board may appeal to the
superior court. ((In all appeals involving a decision or an order of the
hearings board after an informal hearing, the petition shall be filed in the
superior court for the county of the petitioner's residence or principal place
of business, or in the absence of a residence or principal place of business,
for Thurston county. Such appeal may be perfected by filing with the clerk of
the superior court a notice of appeal, and by serving a copy thereof by mail,
or personally on the director, the air pollution control boards or authorities,
established pursuant to chapter 70.94 RCW or on the board as the case may be.
The hearings board shall serve upon the appealing party, the director, the air
pollution control board or authorities established pursuant to chapter 70.94
RCW, or the board, as the case may be, and on any other party appearing at the
hearings board's proceeding, and file with the clerk of the court before trial,
a certified copy of the hearings board's decision and order. Appellate review
of a decision of the superior court may be sought as in other civil cases. No
bond shall be required on appeals to the superior court or on review by the
supreme court unless specifically required by the judge of the superior court.))
Sec. 4. RCW 90.58.180 and 1994 c 253 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 may seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a request for the same within thirty days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6).
((Concurrently with))
Within seven days of the filing of any request for review with the board
as provided in this section pertaining to a final order of a local government,
the requestor shall ((file a copy)) serve copies of his or her
request ((with)) on the department and the attorney general. ((If
it appears to the department or the attorney general that the requestor has
valid reasons to seek review, either the department or the attorney general may
certify the request within thirty days after its receipt to the shorelines
hearings board following which the board shall then, but not otherwise, review
the matter covered by the requestor. The failure to obtain such certification
shall not preclude the requestor from obtaining a review in the superior court
under any right to review otherwise available to the requestor.)) The
department and the attorney general may intervene to protect the public
interest and insure that the provisions of this chapter are complied with at any
time within fifteen days from the date of the receipt by the department or the
attorney general of a copy of the request for review filed pursuant to this
section. ((The shorelines hearings board shall initially schedule review
proceedings on such requests for review without regard as to whether such
requests have or have not been certified or as to whether the period for the
department or the attorney general to intervene has or has not expired, unless
such review is to begin within thirty days of such scheduling. If at the end
of the thirty day period for certification neither the department nor the
attorney general has certified a request for review, the hearings board shall
remove the request from its review schedule.))
(2) The department or the attorney general may obtain review of any final order granting a permit, or granting or denying an application for a permit issued by a local government by filing a written request with the shorelines hearings board and the appropriate local government within thirty days from the date the final order was filed as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6).
(3) The review proceedings authorized in subsections (1) and (2) of this section are subject to the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW pertaining to procedures in adjudicative proceedings. Judicial review of such proceedings of the shorelines hearings board is governed by chapter 34.05 RCW.
(4) A local government may appeal to the shorelines hearings board any rules, regulations, or guidelines adopted or approved by the department within thirty days of the date of the adoption or approval. The board shall make a final decision within sixty days following the hearing held thereon.
If the board determines that the rule, regulation, or guideline:
(a) Is clearly erroneous in light of the policy of this chapter; or
(b) Constitutes an implementation of this chapter in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; or
(c) Is arbitrary and capricious; or
(d) Was developed without fully considering and evaluating all material submitted to the department by the local government; or
(e) Was not adopted in accordance with required procedures;
the board shall enter a final decision declaring the rule, regulation, or guideline invalid, remanding the rule, regulation, or guideline to the department with a statement of the reasons in support of the determination, and directing the department to adopt, after a thorough consultation with the affected local government, a new rule, regulation, or guideline. Unless the board makes one or more of the determinations as hereinbefore provided, the board shall find the rule, regulation, or guideline to be valid and enter a final decision to that effect.
(5) Rules, regulations, and guidelines shall be subject to review in superior court, if authorized pursuant to RCW 34.05.570(2). No review shall be granted by a superior court on petition from a local government unless the local government shall first have obtained review under subsection (4) of this section and the petition for court review is filed within three months after the date of final decision by the shorelines hearings board.
Sec. 5. RCW 34.05.518 and 1988 c 288 s 503 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding under this chapter may be directly reviewed by the court of appeals either (a) upon certification by the superior court pursuant to this section or (b) if the final decision is from an environmental board as defined in subsection (3) of this section, upon acceptance by the court of appeals after a certificate of appealability has been filed by the environmental board that rendered the final decision.
(2) For direct review upon certification by the superior court, an application for direct review must be filed with the superior court within thirty days of the filing of the petition for review in superior court. The superior court may certify a case for direct review only if the judicial review is limited to the record of the agency proceeding and the court finds that:
(((1))) (a)
Fundamental and urgent issues affecting the future administrative process or
the public interest are involved which require a prompt determination;
(((2))) (b)
Delay in obtaining a final and prompt determination of such issues would be
detrimental to any party or the public interest;
(((3))) (c)
An appeal to the court of appeals would be likely regardless of the
determination in superior court; and
(((4))) (d)
The appellate court's determination in the proceeding would have significant
precedential value.
Procedures for certification shall be established by court rule.
(3)(a) For the purposes of direct review of final decisions of environmental boards, environmental boards include those boards identified in RCW 43.21B.005 and growth management hearings boards as identified in RCW 36.70A.250.
(b) An environmental board may issue a certificate of appealability if it finds that delay in obtaining a final and prompt determination of the issues would be detrimental to any party or the public interest and either:
(i) Fundamental and urgent state-wide or regional issues are raised; or
(ii) The proceeding is likely to have significant precedential value.
(4) The environmental board shall state in the certificate of appealability which criteria it applied, explain how that criteria was met, and file with the certificate a copy of the final decision.
(5) For an appellate court to accept direct review of a final decision of an environmental board, it shall consider the same criteria outlined in subsection (3) of this section.
(6) The procedures for direct review of final decisions of environmental boards include:
(a) Within thirty days after filing the petition for review with the superior court, a party may file an application for direct review with the superior court and serve the appropriate environmental board and all parties of record. The application shall request the environmental board to file a certificate of appealability.
(b) If an issue on review is the jurisdiction of the environmental board, the board may file an application for direct review on that issue.
(c) The environmental board shall have thirty days to grant or deny the request for a certificate of appealability and its decision shall be filed with the superior court and served on all parties of record.
(d) If a certificate of appealability is issued, the parties shall have fifteen days from the date of service to file a notice of discretionary review in the superior court, and the notice shall include a copy of the certificate of appealability and a copy of the final decision.
(e) If the appellate court accepts review, the certificate of appealability shall be transmitted to the court of appeals as part of the certified record.
(f) If a certificate of appealability is denied, review shall be by the superior court. The superior court's decision may be appealed to the court of appeals.
Sec. 6. RCW 34.05.522 and 1988 c 288 s 504 are each amended to read as follows:
The court of appeals
may refuse to accept direct review of a case ((certified))
pursuant to RCW 34.05.518 if it finds that the case does not meet the
applicable standard in RCW 34.05.518(2) or (5). Rules of Appellate Procedure
2.3 do not apply in this instance. The refusal to accept such review is
not subject to further appellate review, notwithstanding anything in Rule 13.3
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure to the contrary.
Sec. 7. RCW 75.20.140 and 1989 c 175 s 161 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) ((In all appeals
over which the hydraulic appeals board has jurisdiction, a party taking an
appeal may elect either a formal or informal hearing. Such election shall be
made according to the rules of practice and procedure to be adopted by the
hydraulic appeals board. In the event that appeals are taken from the same decision,
order, or determination, by different parties and only one of such parties
elects a formal hearing, a formal hearing shall be granted.
(2))) In all appeals, the hydraulic appeals board
shall have all powers relating to administration of oaths, issuance of
subpoenas, and taking of depositions, but such powers shall be exercised in
conformity with chapter 34.05 RCW.
(((3))) (2)
In all appeals ((involving a formal hearing)), the hydraulic appeals
board, and each member thereof, shall be subject to all duties imposed upon and
shall have all powers granted to, an agency by those provisions of chapter
34.05 RCW relating to adjudicative proceedings.
(((4))) (3)
All proceedings((, including both formal and informal hearings,)) before
the hydraulic appeals board or any of its members shall be conducted in
accordance with such rules of practice and procedure as the board may
prescribe. Such rules shall be published and distributed.
(((5))) (4)
Judicial review of a decision of the hydraulic appeals board ((shall be de
novo except when the decision has been rendered pursuant to the formal hearing,
in which event judicial review)) may be obtained only pursuant to RCW
34.05.510 through 34.05.598.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:
(1) RCW 43.21B.140 and 1987 c 109 s 30 & 1970 ex.s. c 62 s 44; and
(2) RCW 43.21B.150 and 1990 c 65 s 4, 1974 ex.s. c 69 s 2, & 1970 ex.s. c 62 s 45.
--- END ---