S-0047.3          _______________________________________________

 

                                 SENATE BILL 5213

                  _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington              54th Legislature             1995 Regular Session

 

By Senators Quigley, Haugen, McAuliffe, Wood, McCaslin, Winsley and Rasmussen

 

Read first time 01/16/95.  Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

Revising civil procedure for domestic relations actions.



     AN ACT Relating to civil procedure in domestic relations actions; and amending RCW 26.18.170, 26.23.050, 26.23.130, 26.26.090, 26.21.490, 26.21.520, 26.09.175, and 26.21.115.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 26.18.170 and 1994 c 230 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) Whenever an obligor parent who has been ordered to provide health insurance coverage for a dependent child fails to provide such coverage or lets it lapse, the department or the obligee may seek enforcement of the coverage order as provided under this section.

     (2)(a) If the obligor parent's order to provide health insurance coverage contains language notifying the obligor that failure to provide such coverage or proof that such coverage is unavailable may result in direct enforcement of the order and orders payments through, or has been submitted to, the Washington state support registry for enforcement, then the department may, without further notice to the obligor, send a notice of enrollment to the obligor's employer or union by certified mail, return receipt requested.

     The notice shall require the employer or union to enroll the child in the health insurance plan as provided in subsection (3) of this section.

     (b) If the obligor parent's order to provide health insurance coverage does not order payments through, and has not been submitted to, the Washington state support registry for enforcement:

     (i) The obligee may, without further notice to the obligor send a certified copy of the order requiring health insurance coverage to the obligor's employer or union by certified mail, return receipt requested; and

     (ii) The obligee shall attach a notarized statement to the order declaring that the order is the latest order addressing coverage entered by the court and require the employer or union to enroll the child in the health insurance plan as provided in subsection (3) of this section.

     (3) Upon receipt of an order that provides for health insurance coverage, or a notice of enrollment:

     (a) The obligor's employer or union shall answer the party who sent the order or notice within thirty-five days and confirm that the child:

     (i) Has been enrolled in the health insurance plan;

     (ii) Will be enrolled in the next open enrollment period; or

     (iii) Cannot be covered, stating the reasons why such coverage cannot be provided;

     (b) The employer or union shall withhold any required premium from the obligor's income or wages;

     (c) If more than one plan is offered by the employer or union, and each plan may be extended to cover the child, then the child shall be enrolled in the obligor's plan.  If the obligor's plan does not provide coverage which is accessible to the child, the child shall be enrolled in the least expensive plan otherwise available to the obligor parent;

     (d) The employer or union shall provide information about the name of the health insurance coverage provider or insurer and the extent of coverage available to the obligee or the department and shall make available any necessary claim forms or enrollment membership cards.

     (4) If the order for coverage contains no language notifying the obligor that failure to provide health insurance coverage or proof that such coverage is unavailable may result in direct enforcement of the order, the department or the obligee may serve a written notice of intent to enforce the order on the obligor by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal service.  If the obligor fails to provide written proof that such coverage has been obtained or applied for or fails to provide proof that such coverage is unavailable within twenty days of service of the notice, the department or the obligee may proceed to enforce the order directly as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

     (5) If the obligor ordered to provide health insurance coverage elects to provide coverage that will not be accessible to the child because of geographic or other limitations when accessible coverage is otherwise available, the department or the obligee may serve a written notice of intent to purchase health insurance coverage on the obligor by certified mail, return receipt requested.  The notice shall also specify the type and cost of coverage.

     (6) If the department serves a notice under subsection (5) of this section the obligor shall, within twenty days of the date of service:

     (a) File an application for an adjudicative proceeding; or

     (b) Provide written proof to the department that the obligor has either applied for, or obtained, coverage accessible to the child.

     (7) If the obligee serves a notice under subsection (5) of this section, within twenty days of the date of service the obligor shall provide written proof to the obligee that the obligor has either applied for, or obtained, coverage accessible to the child.

     (8) If the obligor fails to respond to a notice served under subsection (5) of this section to the party who served the notice, the party who served the notice may purchase the health insurance coverage specified in the notice directly.  The amount of the monthly premium shall be added to the support debt and be collectible without further notice.  The amount of the monthly premium may be collected or accrued until the obligor provides proof of the required coverage.

     (9) The signature of the obligee or of a department employee shall be a valid authorization to the coverage provider or insurer for purposes of processing a payment to the child's health services provider.  An order for health insurance coverage shall operate as an assignment of all benefit rights to the obligee or to the child's health services provider, and in any claim against the coverage provider or insurer, the obligee or the obligee's assignee shall be subrogated to the rights of the obligor.  Notwithstanding the provisions of this section regarding assignment of benefits, this section shall not require a health care service contractor authorized under chapter 48.44 RCW or a health maintenance organization authorized under chapter 48.46 RCW to deviate from their contractual provisions and restrictions regarding reimbursement for covered services.  If the coverage is terminated, the employer shall mail a notice of termination to the department or the obligee at the obligee's last known address within thirty days of the termination date.

     (10) This section shall not be construed to limit the right of the obligor or the obligee to bring an action in superior court at any time to enforce, modify, or clarify the original support order.

     (11) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a health maintenance organization, or health care service contractor, to extend coverage to a child who resides outside its service area.

     (12) If an obligor fails to pay his or her portion of any deductible required under the health insurance coverage or fails to pay his or her portion of medical expenses incurred in excess of the coverage provided under the plan, the department or the obligee may enforce collection of the obligor's portion of the deductible or the additional medical expenses through a wage assignment order.  The amount of the deductible or additional medical expenses shall be added to the support debt and be collectible without further notice if the obligor's share of the amount of the deductible or additional expenses is reduced to a sum certain in a court order.

     (13) To be a qualified medical child support order under the employee retirement income security act, 29 U.S.C. 1169 et seq., a support order that requires health insurance coverage for a dependent child must state:

     (a) The name and last known mailing address, if any, of the obligor parent at the time the order is entered;

     (b) The name and mailing address of each dependent child for whom coverage is to be provided at the time the order is entered or the address of the Washington state support registry;

     (c) A reasonable description of the type of coverage to be provided by the plan to each dependent child or the manner in which the type of coverage is to be determined;

     (d) The period to which such order applies, which may be a general provision that states when the support order terminates; and

     (e) Each plan to which the support order applies, which may be a general provision that the order applies to all plans available to the obligor parent now or in the future.

     (14) Support orders entered prior to the effective date of this act that require health insurance coverage for a dependent child and that substantially comply with the requirements for a qualified medical child support order are deemed qualified and enforceable as such in the manner provided by law.

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 26.23.050 and 1994 c 230 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) If the office of support enforcement is providing support enforcement services under RCW 26.23.045, or if a party is applying for support enforcement services by signing the application form on the bottom of the support order, the superior court shall include in all court orders that establish or modify a support obligation:

     (a) A provision that orders and directs the responsible parent to make all support payments to the Washington state support registry;

     (b) A statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued, or other income withholding action under chapter 26.18 or 74.20A RCW may be taken, without further notice to the responsible parent at any time after entry of the court order, unless:

     (i) One of the parties demonstrates, and the court finds, that there is good cause not to require immediate income withholding and that withholding should be delayed until a payment is past due; or

     (ii) The parties reach a written agreement that is approved by the court that provides for an alternate arrangement; and

     (c) A statement that the receiving parent might be required to submit an accounting of how the support is being spent to benefit the child.

     As used in this subsection and subsection (3) of this section, "good cause not to require immediate income withholding" means a written determination of why implementing immediate wage withholding would not be in the child's best interests and, in modification cases, proof of timely payment of previously ordered support.

     (2) In all other cases not under subsection (1) of this section, the court may order the responsible parent to make payments directly to the person entitled to receive the payments, to the Washington state support registry, or may order that payments be made in accordance with an alternate arrangement agreed upon by the parties.

     (a) The superior court shall include in all orders under this subsection that establish or modify a support obligation:

     (i) A statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued or other income withholding action under chapter 26.18 or 74.20A RCW may be taken, without further notice to the responsible parent at any time after entry of the court order, unless:

     (A) One of the parties demonstrates, and the court finds, that there is good cause not to require immediate income withholding and that withholding should be delayed until a payment is past due; or

     (B) The parties reach a written agreement that is approved by the court that provides for an alternate arrangement; and

     (ii) A statement that the receiving parent may be required to submit an accounting of how the support is being spent to benefit the child.

     As used in this subsection, "good cause not to require immediate income withholding" is any reason that the court finds appropriate.

     (b) The superior court may order immediate or delayed income withholding as follows:

     (i) Immediate income withholding may be ordered if the responsible parent has earnings.  If immediate income withholding is ordered under this subsection, all support payments shall be paid to the Washington state support registry.  The superior court shall issue a mandatory wage assignment order as set forth in chapter 26.18 RCW when the support order is signed by the court.  The parent entitled to receive the transfer payment is responsible for serving the employer with the order and for its enforcement as set forth in chapter 26.18 RCW.

     (ii) If immediate income withholding is not ordered, the court shall require that income withholding be delayed until a payment is past due.  The support order shall contain a statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued, or other income-withholding action under chapter 26.18 or 74.20A RCW may be taken, without further notice to the responsible parent, after a payment is past due.

     (c) If a mandatory wage withholding order under chapter 26.18 RCW is issued under this subsection and the office of support enforcement provides support enforcement services under RCW 26.23.045, the existing wage withholding assignment is prospectively superseded upon the office of support enforcement's subsequent service of an income withholding notice.

     (3) The office of administrative hearings and the department of social and health services shall require that all support obligations established as administrative orders include a provision which orders and directs that the responsible parent shall make all support payments to the Washington state support registry.  All administrative orders shall also state that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued, or other income withholding action taken without further notice to the responsible parent at any time after entry of the order, unless:

     (a) One of the parties demonstrates, and the presiding officer finds, that there is good cause not to require immediate income withholding; or

     (b) The parties reach a written agreement that is approved by the presiding officer that provides for an alternate agreement.

     (4) If the support order does not include the provision ordering and directing that all payments be made to the Washington state support registry and a statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued if a support payment is past due or at any time after the entry of the order, the office of support enforcement may serve a notice on the responsible parent stating such requirements and authorizations.  Service may be by personal service or any form of mail requiring a return receipt.

     (5) Every support order shall state:

     (a) The address where the support payment is to be sent;

     (b) That a notice of payroll deduction may be issued or other income withholding action under chapter 26.18 or 74.20A RCW may be taken, without further notice to the responsible parent at any time after entry of an order by the court, unless:

     (i) One of the parties demonstrates, and the court finds, that there is good cause not to require immediate income withholding; or

     (ii) The parties reach a written agreement that is approved by the court that provides for an alternate arrangement;

     (c) The income of the parties, if known, or that their income is unknown and the income upon which the support award is based;

     (d) The support award as a sum certain amount;

     (e) The specific day or date on which the support payment is due;

     (f) The social security number, residence address, and name and address of the employer of the responsible parent;

     (g) The social security number and residence address of the physical custodian except as provided in subsection (6) of this section;

     (h) The names, dates of birth, and social security numbers, if any, of the dependent children;

     (i) In cases requiring payment to the Washington state support registry, that the parties are to notify the Washington state support registry of any change in residence address.  The responsible parent shall notify the registry of the name and address of his or her current employer, whether he or she has access to health insurance coverage at reasonable cost and, if so, the health insurance policy information;

     (j) That any parent owing a duty of child support shall be obligated to provide health insurance coverage for his or her child if coverage that can be extended to cover the child is or becomes available to that parent through employment or is union-related as provided under RCW 26.09.105;

     (k) That if proof of health insurance coverage or proof that the coverage is unavailable is not provided within twenty days, the obligee or the department may seek direct enforcement of the coverage through the obligor's employer or union without further notice to the obligor as provided under chapter 26.18 RCW; ((and))

     (l) The reasons for not ordering health insurance coverage if the order fails to require such coverage; and

     (m) The qualifying language for a medical child support order as set forth in RCW 26.18.170.

     (6) The physical custodian's address:

     (a) Shall be omitted from an order entered under the administrative procedure act.  When the physical custodian's address is omitted from an order, the order shall state that the custodian's address is known to the office of support enforcement.

     (b) A responsible parent may request the physical custodian's residence address by submission of a request for disclosure under RCW 26.23.120 to the office of support enforcement.

     (7) The superior court clerk, the office of administrative hearings, and the department of social and health services shall, within five days of entry, forward to the Washington state support registry, a true and correct copy of all superior court orders or administrative orders establishing or modifying a support obligation which provide that support payments shall be made to the support registry.  If a superior court order entered prior to January 1, 1988, directs the responsible parent to make support payments to the clerk, the clerk shall send a true and correct copy of the support order and the payment record to the registry for enforcement action when the clerk identifies that a payment is more than fifteen days past due.  The office of support enforcement shall reimburse the clerk for the reasonable costs of copying and sending copies of court orders to the registry at the reimbursement rate provided in Title IV-D of the social security act.

     (8) Receipt of a support order by the registry or other action under this section on behalf of a person or persons who have not made a written application for support enforcement services to the office of support enforcement and who are not recipients of public assistance is deemed to be a request for payment services only.

     (9) After the responsible parent has been ordered or notified to make payments to the Washington state support registry under this section, the responsible parent shall be fully responsible for making all payments to the Washington state support registry and shall be subject to payroll deduction or other income withholding action.  The responsible parent shall not be entitled to credit against a support obligation for any payments made to a person or agency other than to the Washington state support registry except as provided under RCW 74.20.101.  A civil action may be brought by the payor to recover payments made to persons or agencies who have received and retained support moneys paid contrary to the provisions of this section.

 

     Sec. 3.  RCW 26.23.130 and 1991 c 367 s 43 are each amended to read as follows:

     The department shall be given twenty calendar days prior notice of the entry of any final order and five days prior notice of the entry of any temporary order in any proceeding involving child support or maintenance if the department has a financial interest based on an assignment of support rights under RCW 74.20.330 or the state has a subrogated interest under RCW 74.20A.030.  Service of this notice upon the department shall be by personal service on, or mailing by any form of mail requiring a return receipt to, the office of the attorney general; except that notice shall be given to the office of the prosecuting attorney for the county in which the action is filed in lieu of the office of the attorney general in those counties and in the types of cases as designated by the office of the attorney general by letter sent to the presiding superior court judge of that county.  The department shall not be entitled to terms for a party's failure to serve the department within the time requirements for this section, unless the department proves that the party knew that the department had an assignment of support rights or a subrogated interest and that the failure to serve the department was intentional.

 

     Sec. 4.  RCW 26.26.090 and 1984 c 260 s 31 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) The child shall be made a party to the action.  If the child is a minor, the child shall be represented by the child's general guardian or a guardian ad litem appointed by the court subject to RCW 74.20.310.  The child's mother or father may not represent the child as guardian or otherwise.  The natural mother, each man presumed to be the father under RCW 26.26.040, and a man or men alleged to be the natural father shall be made parties or, if not subject to the jurisdiction of the court, shall, if possible, be given actual notice of the action and an opportunity to be heard in a manner as the court may prescribe.  When this state is acting as the responding state under chapter 26.21 RCW, the party residing in the initiating state may be served personally, or by certified mail addressed to the party or to the agency designated under Title IV-D of the federal social security act that transmitted the case to this state.

     (2) Any party may cause to be joined as additional parties other men alleged to be the father of the child or any other person necessary for a full adjudication of the issues.

     (3) The failure or inability to join as a party an alleged or presumed father does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to adjudicate some or all of the issues based on the evidence and parties available to it.

     (4) If more than one party is alleged to be the father of the child, the default of a party shall not preclude the court from finding any other party to be the father of the child.

 

     Sec. 5.  RCW 26.21.490 and 1993 c 318 s 602 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) A support order or income-withholding order of another state may be registered in this state by sending the following documents and information to the superior court of any county in this state where the obligor resides, works, or has property:

     (a) A letter of transmittal to the tribunal requesting registration and enforcement;

     (b) Two copies, including one certified copy, of all orders to be registered, including any modification of an order;

     (c) A sworn statement by the party seeking registration or a certified statement by the custodian of the records showing the amount of any arrearage;

     (d) The name of the obligor and, if known:

     (i) The obligor's address and social security number;

     (ii) The name and address of the obligor's employer and any other source of income of the obligor; and

     (iii) A description and the location of property of the obligor in this state not exempt from execution; and

     (e) The name and address of the obligee ((and, if applicable,)) or the agency or person to whom support payments are to be remitted.

     (2) On receipt of a request for registration, the registering tribunal shall cause the order to be filed as a foreign judgment, together with one copy of the documents and information, regardless of their form.

     (3) A petition or comparable pleading seeking a remedy that must be affirmatively sought under other law of this state may be filed at the same time as the request for registration or later.  The pleading must specify the grounds for the remedy sought.

 

     Sec. 6.  RCW 26.21.520 and 1993 c 318 s 605 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) When a support order or income-withholding order issued in another state is registered, the registering tribunal or petitioner shall notify the nonregistering party.  Notice must be given by certified or registered mail or by any means of personal service authorized by the law of this state.  The notice must be accompanied by a copy of the registered order and the documents and relevant information accompanying the order.

     (2) The notice must inform the nonregistering party:

     (a) That a registered order is enforceable as of the date of registration in the same manner as an order issued by a tribunal of this state;

     (b) That a hearing to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered order must be requested within twenty days after the date of receipt by certified or registered mail or personal service of the notice given to a nonregistering party within the state and within sixty days after the date of receipt by certified or registered mail or personal service of the notice on a nonregistering party outside of the state;

     (c) That failure to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered order in a timely manner will result in confirmation of the order and enforcement of the order and the alleged arrearages and precludes further contest of that order with respect to any matter that could have been asserted; and

     (d) Of the amount of any alleged arrearages.

     (3) Upon registration of an income-withholding order for enforcement, the registering tribunal shall notify the obligor's employer pursuant to the income-withholding law of this state.

 

     Sec. 7.  RCW 26.09.175 and 1992 c 229 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) A proceeding for the modification of an order of child support shall commence with the filing of a petition and worksheets.  The petition shall be in the form prescribed by the administrator for the courts.  There shall be a fee of twenty dollars for the filing of a petition for modification of dissolution.

     (2) The petitioner shall serve upon the other party the summons, a copy of the petition, and the worksheets in the form prescribed by the administrator for the courts.  If the modification proceeding is the first action filed in this state, service shall be made by personal service.  If the decree to be modified was entered in this state, service shall be by personal service or by any form of mail requiring a return receipt.  If the support obligation has been assigned to the state pursuant to RCW 74.20.330 or the state has a subrogated interest under RCW 74.20A.030, the summons, petition, and worksheets shall also be served on the attorney general or the prosecuting attorney, as set forth in RCW 26.23.130.  Proof of service shall be filed with the court.

     When this state is acting as the responding state under chapter 26.21 RCW, service on the party residing in the initiating state shall be served personally, or by certified mail addressed to the party or to the agency designated under Title IV-D of the federal social security act that transmitted the case to this state.

     (3) The responding party's answer and worksheets shall be served and the answer filed within twenty days after service of the petition or sixty days if served out of state.  The responding party's failure to file an answer within the time required shall result in entry of a default judgment for the petitioner.

     (4) At any time after responsive pleadings are filed, either party may schedule the matter for hearing.

     (5) Unless both parties stipulate to arbitration or the presiding judge authorizes oral testimony pursuant to subsection (6) of this section, a petition for modification of an order of child support shall be heard by the court on affidavits, the petition, answer, and worksheets only.

     (6) A party seeking authority to present oral testimony on the petition to modify a support order shall file an appropriate motion not later than ten days after the time of notice of hearing.  Affidavits and exhibits setting forth the reasons oral testimony is necessary to a just adjudication of the issues shall accompany the petition.  The affidavits and exhibits must demonstrate the extraordinary features of the case.  Factors which may be considered include, but are not limited to:  (a) Substantial questions of credibility on a major issue; (b) insufficient or inconsistent discovery materials not correctable by further discovery; or (c) particularly complex circumstances requiring expert testimony.

 

     Sec. 8.  RCW 26.21.115 and 1993 c 318 s 205 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1)(a) A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a child support order:

     (((a))) (i) As long as this state remains the residence of the obligor, the individual obligee, or the child for whose benefit the support order is issued; or

     (((b))) (ii) Until each individual party has filed written consent with the tribunal of this state for a tribunal of another state to modify the order and assume continuing, exclusive jurisdiction.

     (b) An administrative support order issued under chapter 74.20A RCW shall be superseded upon entry of a Washington state superior court order to the extent the superior court order is inconsistent with the administrative order.

     (2) A tribunal of this state issuing a child support order consistent with the law of this state may not exercise its  continuing jurisdiction to modify the order if the order has been modified by a tribunal of another state pursuant to a law substantially similar to this chapter.

     (3) If a child support order of this state is modified by a tribunal of another state pursuant to a law substantially similar to this chapter, a tribunal of this state loses its continuing, exclusive jurisdiction with regard to prospective enforcement of the order issued in this state, and may only:

     (a) Enforce the order that was modified as to amounts accruing before the modification;

     (b) Enforce nonmodifiable aspects of that order; and

     (c) Provide other appropriate relief for violations of that order which occurred before the effective date of the modification.

     (4) A tribunal of this state shall recognize the continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of a tribunal of another state that has issued a child support order pursuant to a law substantially similar to this chapter.

     (5) A temporary support order issued ex parte or pending resolution of a jurisdictional conflict does not create continuing, exclusive jurisdiction in the issuing tribunal.

     (6) A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a spousal support order throughout the existence of the support obligation.  A tribunal of this state may not modify a spousal support order issued by a tribunal of another state having continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over that order under the law of that state.

 


                                    --- END ---