_______________________________________________

 

               ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6299

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      54th Legislature     1996 Regular Session

 

By Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Rasmussen, Long, Fairley, McCaslin, Haugen, Winsley, Oke and Spanel)

 

Read first time 02/02/96.

 

Increasing penalties for multiple violations of domestic violence protection orders.



    AN ACT Relating to no contact and protection orders; amending RCW 10.99.040, 10.99.050, and 26.50.110; and prescribing penalties.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 10.99.040 and 1995 c 246 s 23 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Because of the serious nature of domestic violence, the court in domestic violence actions:

    (a) Shall not dismiss any charge or delay disposition because of concurrent dissolution or other civil proceedings;

    (b) Shall not require proof that either party is seeking a dissolution of marriage prior to instigation of criminal proceedings;

    (c) Shall waive any requirement that the victim's location be disclosed to any person, other than the attorney of a criminal defendant, upon a showing that there is a possibility of further violence:  PROVIDED, That the court may order a criminal defense attorney not to disclose to his or her client the victim's location; ((and))

    (d) Shall identify by any reasonable means on docket sheets those criminal actions arising from acts of domestic violence; and

    (e) May require a person subject to a protective order to wear an electronic monitoring device that initiates an alarm when the person wearing it approaches a location in violation of the order.

    (2) Because of the likelihood of repeated violence directed at those who have been victims of domestic violence in the past, when any person charged with or arrested for a crime involving domestic violence is released from custody before arraignment or trial on bail or personal recognizance, the court authorizing the release may prohibit that person from having any contact with the victim.  The jurisdiction authorizing the release shall determine whether that person should be prohibited from having any contact with the victim.  If there is no outstanding restraining or protective order prohibiting that person from having contact with the victim, the court authorizing release may issue, by telephone, a no-contact order prohibiting the person charged or arrested from having contact with the victim.  In issuing the order, the court shall consider the provisions of RCW 9.41.800.  The no-contact order shall also be issued in writing as soon as possible. 

    (3) At the time of arraignment the court shall determine whether a no-contact order shall be issued or extended.  If a no-contact order is issued or extended, the court may also include in the conditions of release a requirement that the defendant submit to electronic monitoring.  If electronic monitoring is ordered, the court shall specify who shall provide the monitoring services, and the terms under which the monitoring shall be performed.  Upon conviction, the court may require as a condition of the sentence that the defendant reimburse the providing agency for the costs of the electronic monitoring.

    (4)(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, willful violation of a court order issued under subsection (2) or (3) of this section is a gross misdemeanor.  A third or subsequent conviction for willful violation of a court order issued under subsection (2) or (3) of this section is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.  Upon conviction and in addition to other penalties provided by law, the court may require that the defendant submit to electronic monitoring.  The court shall specify who shall provide the electronic monitoring services and the terms under which the monitoring must be performed.  The court also may include a requirement that the defendant pay the costs of the monitoring.  The court shall consider the ability of the convicted person to pay for electronic monitoring.

    (b) Any assault that is a violation of an order issued under this section and that does not amount to assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or 9A.36.021 is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW, and any conduct in violation of a protective order issued under this section that is reckless and creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.

    (c) The written order releasing the person charged or arrested shall contain the court's directives and shall bear the legend:  "Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 10.99 RCW and will subject a violator to arrest; any assault or reckless endangerment that is a violation of this order is a felony.  You can be arrested even if any person protected by the order invites or allows you to violate the order's prohibitions.  You have the sole responsibility to avoid or refrain from violating the order's provisions.  Only the court can change the order."  A certified copy of the order shall be provided to the victim.  If a no-contact order has been issued prior to charging, that order shall expire at arraignment or within seventy-two hours if charges are not filed.  Such orders need not be entered into the computer-based criminal intelligence information system in this state which is used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants.

    (5) Whenever an order prohibiting contact is issued, modified, or terminated under subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order.  Upon receipt of the copy of the order the law enforcement agency shall forthwith enter the order for one year or until the expiration date specified on the order into any computer-based criminal intelligence information system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants.  Entry into the law enforcement information system constitutes notice to all law enforcement agencies of the existence of the order.  The order is fully enforceable in any jurisdiction in the state.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 10.99.050 and 1991 c 301 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) When a defendant is found guilty of a crime and a condition of the sentence restricts the defendant's ability to have contact with the victim, such condition shall be recorded and a written certified copy of that order shall be provided to the victim.

    (2) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, willful violation of a court order issued under this section is a gross misdemeanor.  A third or subsequent conviction for willful violation of a court order issued under this section is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.  Any assault that is a violation of an order issued under this section and that does not amount to assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or 9A.36.021 is a class C felony, and any conduct in violation of a protective order issued under this section that is reckless and creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person is a class C felony.  The written order shall contain the court's directives and shall bear the legend:  Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 10.99 RCW and will subject a violator to arrest; any assault or reckless endangerment that is a violation of this order is a felony.

    (3) Whenever an order prohibiting contact is issued pursuant to this section, the clerk of the court shall forward a copy of the order on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order.  Upon receipt of the copy of the order the law enforcement agency shall forthwith enter the order for one year into any computer-based criminal intelligence information system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants.  Entry into the law enforcement information system constitutes notice to all law enforcement agencies of the existence of the order.  The order is fully enforceable in any jurisdiction in the state. 

    (4) The court may require a person subject to a protective order to wear an electronic monitoring device that initiates an alarm when the person wearing it approaches a location in violation of the order.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 26.50.110 and 1995 c 246 s 14 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Whenever an order for protection is granted under this chapter and the respondent or person to be restrained knows of the order, a violation of the restraint provisions or of a provision excluding the person from a residence, workplace, school, or day care is a gross misdemeanor.  A third or subsequent conviction for violating an order for protection granted under this chapter is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.  Upon conviction, and in addition to any other penalties provided by law, the court may require that the respondent submit to electronic monitoring.  The court shall specify who shall provide the electronic monitoring services, and the terms under which the monitoring shall be performed.  The order also may include a requirement that the respondent pay the costs of the monitoring.  The court shall consider the ability of the convicted person to pay for electronic monitoring.

    (2) A peace officer shall arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order issued under this chapter that restrains the person or excludes the person from a residence, workplace, school, or day care, if the person restrained knows of the order.  Presence of the order in the law enforcement computer-based criminal intelligence information system is not the only means of establishing knowledge of the order.

    (3) A violation of an order for protection shall also constitute contempt of court, and is subject to the penalties prescribed by law.

    (4) Any assault that is a violation of an order issued under this chapter and that does not amount to assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or 9A.36.021 is a class C felony, and any conduct in violation of a protective order issued under this chapter that is reckless and creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person is a class C felony.

    (5) Upon the filing of an affidavit by the petitioner or any peace officer alleging that the respondent has violated an order for protection granted under this chapter, the court may issue an order to the respondent, requiring the respondent to appear and show cause within fourteen days why the respondent should not be found in contempt of court and punished accordingly.  The hearing may be held in the court of any county or municipality in which the petitioner or respondent temporarily or permanently resides at the time of the alleged violation.

    (6) The court may require a person subject to a protective order to wear an electronic monitoring device that initiates an alarm when the person wearing it approaches a location in violation of the order.

 


                            --- END ---