CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

             ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6093

 

 

 

 

                        54th Legislature

                      1996 Regular Session

Passed by the Senate February 2, 1996

  YEAS 48   NAYS 0

 

 

 

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House February 27, 1996

  YEAS 98   NAYS 0

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6093 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

                            Secretary

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

               ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6093

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 1996 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      54th Legislature     1996 Regular Session

 

By Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Sheldon, Winsley, Drew, Owen, Prentice and Quigley)

 

Read first time 1/24/96.

 

Providing for sidewalk reconstruction.



    AN ACT Relating to sidewalk reconstruction; and amending RCW 35.68.010, 35.69.010, 35.69.020, 35.70.010, and 35.70.020.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 35.68.010 and 1965 c 7 s 35.68.010 are each amended to read as follows:

    Any city or town, hereinafter referred to as city, is authorized to construct, reconstruct, and repair sidewalks, gutters and curbs along and driveways across sidewalks, which work is hereafter referred to as the improvement, and to pay the costs thereof from any available funds, or to require the abutting property owner to construct the improvement at ((his)) the owner's own cost or expense, or, subject to the limitations in RCW 35.69.020 (2) and (3), to assess all or any portion of the costs thereof against the abutting property owner.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 35.69.010 and 1994 c 81 s 61 are each amended to read as follows:

    The term "street" as used herein includes boulevard, avenue, street, alley, way, lane, square or place.

    The term "city" includes any city of the first or second class or any other city of equal population working under a special charter.

    The term "sidewalk" includes any and all pedestrian structures or forms of ((street)) improvement for pedestrians included in the space between the street margin, as defined by a curb or the edge of the traveled road surface, and the ((roadway)) line where the public right of way meets the abutting property.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 35.69.020 and 1965 c 7 s 35.69.020 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Whenever a portion, not longer than one block in length, of any street in any city is not improved by the construction of a sidewalk thereon, or the sidewalk thereon has become unfit or unsafe for purposes of public travel, and such street adjacent to both ends of said portion is so improved and in good repair, and the city council of such city by resolution finds that the improvement of such portion of such street by the construction or reconstruction of a sidewalk thereon is necessary for the public safety and convenience, the duty, burden, and expense of constructing or reconstructing such sidewalk shall devolve upon the property directly abutting upon such portion((:  PROVIDED, That such)) except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section.

    (2) An abutting property shall not be charged with any costs of construction or reconstruction under this chapter, or under chapter 35.68 or 35.70 RCW, in excess of fifty percent of the valuation of such abutting property, exclusive of improvements thereon, according to the valuation last placed upon it for purposes of general taxation.

    (3) An abutting property shall not be charged with any costs of reconstruction under this chapter, or under chapter 35.68 or 35.70 RCW,  if the reconstruction is required to correct deterioration of or damage to the sidewalk that is the direct result of actions by the city or its agents or to correct deterioration of or damage to the sidewalk that is the direct result of the failure of the city to enforce its ordinances.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 35.70.010 and 1965 c 7 s 35.70.010 are each amended to read as follows:

    For the purposes of this chapter all property having a frontage on the side or margin of any street ((or other public place)) shall be deemed abutting property, and such property shall be chargeable, as provided in this chapter, with all costs of construction of any form of sidewalk improvement, between the margin of ((said)) the street ((or other public place)), as defined by a curb or the edge of the traveled road surface, and the ((roadway lying in front of and adjacent to said)) line where the public right of way meets the abutting property, and the term sidewalk as used in this chapter shall be construed to mean and include any and all pedestrian structures or forms of improvement for pedestrians included in the space between the street margin, as defined by a curb or the edge of the traveled road surface, and the ((roadway known as the sidewalk area)) line where the public right of way meets the abutting property.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 35.70.020 and 1994 c 81 s 62 are each amended to read as follows:

    In all cities of the second class and towns the burden and expense of constructing sidewalks along the side of any street or other public place shall devolve upon and be borne by the property directly abutting thereon.  The cost of reconstructing or repairing existing sidewalks may devolve upon the abutting property subject to the limitations in RCW 35.69.020 (2) and (3).

 


                            --- END ---