AN
ACT Relating to clarifying and streamlining procedures of the joint
administrative rules review committee; amending RCW 34.05.330, 34.05.610,
34.05.620, 34.05.630, 34.05.640, 34.05.655, and 34.05.660; and repealing RCW
34.05.645.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec.
1. RCW
34.05.330 and 1995 c 403 s 703 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
Any person may petition an agency requesting the adoption, amendment, or repeal
of any rule. The office of financial management shall prescribe by rule the
format for such petitions and the procedure for their submission,
consideration, and disposition and provide a standard form that may be used to
petition any agency. Within sixty days after submission of a petition, the
agency shall either (a) deny the petition in writing, stating (i) its reasons
for the denial, specifically addressing the concerns raised by the petitioner,
and, where appropriate, (ii) the alternative means by which it will address the
concerns raised by the petitioner, or (b) initiate rule-making proceedings in
accordance with this chapter.
(2)
If an agency denies a petition to repeal or amend a rule submitted under
subsection (1) of this section, and the petition alleges that the rule is not
within the intent of the legislature or was not adopted in accordance with all
applicable provisions of law, the person may petition for review of the rule by
the joint administrative rules review committee under RCW 34.05.655.
(3)
If an agency denies a petition to repeal or amend a rule submitted under
subsection (1) of this section, the petitioner, within thirty days of the
denial, may appeal the denial to the governor. The governor shall immediately
file notice of the appeal with the code reviser for publication in the
Washington state register. Within forty-five days after receiving the appeal,
the governor shall either (a) deny the petition in writing, stating (i) his or
her reasons for the denial, specifically addressing the concerns raised by the
petitioner, and, (ii) where appropriate, the alternative means by which he or
she will address the concerns raised by the petitioner; (b) for agencies listed
in RCW 43.17.010, direct the agency to initiate rule-making proceedings in
accordance with this chapter; or (c) for agencies not listed in RCW 43.17.010,
recommend that the agency initiate rule-making proceedings in accordance with
this chapter. The governor's response to the appeal shall be published in the
Washington state register and copies shall be submitted to the chief clerk of
the house of representatives and the secretary of the senate.
(((3)))
(4) In petitioning for repeal or amendment of a rule under this section,
a person is encouraged to address, among other concerns:
(a)
Whether the rule is authorized;
(b)
Whether the rule is needed;
(c)
Whether the rule conflicts with or duplicates other federal, state, or local
laws;
(d)
Whether alternatives to the rule exist that will serve the same purpose at less
cost;
(e)
Whether the rule applies differently to public and private entities;
(f)
Whether the rule serves the purposes for which it was adopted;
(g)
Whether the costs imposed by the rule are unreasonable;
(h)
Whether the rule is clearly and simply stated; ((and))
(i)
Whether the rule is different than a federal law applicable to the same
activity or subject matter without adequate justification; and
(j)
Whether the rule was adopted according to all applicable provisions of law.
(((4)))
(5) The business assistance center and the office of financial
management shall coordinate efforts among agencies to inform the public about
the existence of this rules review process.
(((5)))
(6) The office of financial management shall initiate the rule making
required by subsection (1) of this section by September 1, 1995.
Sec.
2. RCW
34.05.610 and 1988 c 288 s 601 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
There is hereby created a joint administrative rules review committee which
shall be a bipartisan committee consisting of four senators and four
representatives from the state legislature. The senate members of the
committee shall be appointed by the president of the senate, and the house
members of the committee shall be appointed by the speaker of the house. Not
more than two members from each house may be from the same political party. The
appointing authorities shall also appoint one alternate member from each caucus
of each house. All appointments to the committee are subject to approval
by the caucuses to which the appointed members belong.
(2)
Members and alternates shall be appointed as soon as possible after the
legislature convenes in regular session in an odd-numbered year, and their
terms shall extend until their successors are appointed and qualified at the
next regular session of the legislature in an odd-numbered year or until such
((members)) persons no longer serve in the legislature, whichever
occurs first. Members and alternates may be reappointed to ((a))
the committee.
(3)
The president of the senate shall appoint the chairperson in even-numbered
years and the vice chairperson in odd-numbered years from among committee
membership. The speaker of the house shall appoint the chairperson in
odd-numbered years and the vice chairperson in even-numbered years from among
committee membership. Such appointments shall be made in January of each year
as soon as possible after a legislative session convenes.
(4)
The chairperson of the committee shall cause all meeting notices and
committee documents to be sent to the members and alternates. A vacancy ((on
the committee)) shall be filled by appointment of a legislator from the
same political party as the original appointment. The appropriate appointing
authority shall make the appointment within thirty days of the vacancy
occurring.
Sec.
3. RCW
34.05.620 and 1994 c 249 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:
((Whenever
a majority of the members of the rules review committee determines)) If
the rules review committee finds by a majority vote of its members that a
proposed rule is not within the intent of the legislature as expressed in the
statute which the rule implements, or that an agency may not be adopting a
proposed rule in accordance with all applicable provisions of law, ((including
section 4 of this act and chapter 19.85 RCW,)) the committee shall give the
affected agency written notice of its decision. The notice shall be given at
least seven days prior to any hearing scheduled for consideration of or
adoption of the proposed rule pursuant to RCW 34.05.320. The notice shall
include a statement of the review committee's findings and the reasons
therefor. When the agency holds a hearing on the proposed rule, the agency shall
consider the review committee's decision.
Sec.
4. RCW
34.05.630 and 1994 c 249 s 18 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
All rules required to be filed pursuant to RCW 34.05.380, and emergency rules
adopted pursuant to RCW 34.05.350, are subject to selective review by the
legislature.
(2)
((The rules review committee may review an agency's use of policy
statements, guidelines, and issuances that are of general applicability, or their
equivalents to determine whether or not an agency has failed to adopt a rule or
whether they are within the intent of the legislature as expressed by the
governing statute)) All agency policy and interpretive statements are
subject to selective review by the legislature.
(3)
If the rules review committee finds by a majority vote of its members: (a)
That an existing rule is not within the intent of the legislature as expressed
by the statute which the rule implements, (b) that the rule has not been adopted
in accordance with all applicable provisions of law, ((including section 4
of this act if the rule was adopted after the effective date of section 4 of
this act and chapter 19.85 RCW,)) or (c) that an agency is using a
policy or interpretive statement((, guideline, or issuance)) in
place of a rule, ((or (d) that the policy statement, guideline, or issuance
is outside of legislative intent,)) the agency affected shall be notified
of such finding and the reasons therefor. Within thirty days of the receipt of
the rules review committee's notice, the agency shall file notice of a hearing
on the rules review committee's finding with the code reviser and mail notice
to all persons who have made timely request of the agency for advance notice of
its rule-making proceedings as provided in RCW 34.05.320. The agency's notice
shall include the rules review committee's findings and reasons therefor, and
shall be published in the Washington state register in accordance with the
provisions of chapter 34.08 RCW.
(4)
The agency shall consider fully all written and oral submissions regarding (a)
whether the rule in question is within the intent of the legislature as
expressed by the statute which the rule implements, (b) whether the rule was
adopted in accordance with all applicable provisions of law, ((including
section 4 of this act if the rule was adopted after the effective date of
section 4 of this act and chapter 19.85 RCW,)) or (c) whether the
agency is using a policy or interpretive statement((, guideline, or
issuance)) in place of a rule((, or (d) whether the policy statement,
guideline, or issuance is within the legislative intent)).
Sec.
5. RCW
34.05.640 and 1994 c 249 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
Within seven days of an agency hearing held after notification of the agency by
the rules review committee pursuant to RCW 34.05.620 or 34.05.630, the affected
agency shall notify the committee of its intended action on a proposed
or existing rule to which the committee objected or on a committee finding of
the agency's failure to adopt rules. ((If the rules review committee
determines, by a majority vote of its members, that the agency has failed to
provide for the required hearings or notice of its action to the committee, the
committee may file notice of its objections, together with a concise statement
of the reasons therefor, with the code reviser within thirty days of such
determination.))
(2)
If the rules review committee finds((,)) by a majority vote of its
members: (a) That the proposed or existing rule in question ((has not been))
will not be modified, amended, withdrawn, or repealed by the agency so
as to conform with the intent of the legislature, ((or)) (b) that an
existing rule was not adopted in accordance with all applicable provisions of
law, ((including section 4 of this act if the rule was adopted after the
effective date of section 4 of this act and chapter 19.85 RCW,)) or (c)
that the agency ((is using a policy statement, guideline, or issuance in
place of a rule, or that the policy statement, guideline, or issuance is
outside of the legislative intent)) will not replace the policy or
interpretive statement with a rule, the rules review committee may, within
thirty days from notification by the agency of its intended action, file
with the code reviser notice of its objections together with a concise
statement of the reasons therefor. Such notice and statement shall also be
provided to the agency by the rules review committee.
(3)
If the rules review committee makes an adverse finding regarding an existing
rule under subsection (2) (a) or (b) of this section, the committee
may, by a majority vote of its members, recommend suspension of ((an
existing)) the rule. Within seven days of such vote the committee
shall transmit to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature, the
governor, the code reviser, and the agency written notice of its objection and
recommended suspension and the concise reasons therefor. Within thirty days of
receipt of the notice, the governor shall transmit to the committee, the code
reviser, and the agency written approval or disapproval of the recommended
suspension. If the suspension is approved by the governor, it is effective
from the date of that approval and continues until ninety days after the
expiration of the next regular legislative session.
(4)
((If the governor disapproves the recommendation of the rules review
committee to suspend the rule, the transmittal of such decision, along with the
findings of the rules review committee, shall be treated by the agency as a
petition by the rules review committee to repeal the rule under RCW 34.05.330.
(5))) The
code reviser shall publish transmittals from the rules review committee or the
governor issued pursuant to subsection (((1),)) (2)((,)) or (3)
of this section in the Washington state register and shall publish in the next
supplement and compilation of the Washington Administrative Code a reference to
the committee's objection or recommended suspension and the governor's action
on it and to the issue of the Washington state register in which the full text
thereof appears.
(((6)))
(5) The reference shall be removed from a rule published in the
Washington Administrative Code if a subsequent adjudicatory proceeding
determines that the rule is within the intent of the legislature or was adopted
in accordance with all applicable laws, whichever was the objection of the
rules review committee.
NEW
SECTION. Sec. 6. RCW
34.05.645 and 1995 c 403 s 501 are each repealed.
Sec.
7. RCW
34.05.655 and 1995 c 403 s 502 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
Any person may petition the rules review committee for a review of ((that
rule)) a proposed or existing rule or a policy or interpretive statement.
Within thirty days of the receipt of the petition, the rules review committee
shall acknowledge receipt of the petition and describe any initial action
taken. If the rules review committee rejects the petition, a written statement
of the reasons for rejection shall be included.
(2)
A person may petition the rules review committee under subsection (1) of
this section requesting review of an existing rule only if the person has
petitioned the agency to amend or repeal the rule under RCW 34.05.330(1) and
such petition was denied.
(3)
A petition for review of a rule under subsection (1) of this section shall:
(a)
Identify with specificity the proposed or existing rule to be reviewed;
(b)
Identify the specific statute identified by the agency as authorizing the rule,
the specific statute which the rule interprets or implements, and, if
applicable, the specific statute the department is alleged not to have followed
in adopting the rule;
(c)
State the reasons why the petitioner believes that the rule is not within the
intent of the legislature, or that its adoption was not or is not in accordance
with law, and provide documentation to support these statements;
(d)
Identify any known judicial action regarding the rule or statutes identified in
the petition.
A
petition to review an existing rule shall also include a copy of the agency's
denial of a petition to amend or repeal the rule issued under RCW 34.05.330(1)
and, if available, a copy of the governor's denial issued under RCW
34.05.330(3).
(4)
A petition for review of a policy or interpretive statement under subsection
(1) of this section shall:
(a)
Identify the specific statement to be reviewed;
(b)
Identify the specific statute which the rule interprets or implements;
(c)
State the reasons why the petitioner believes that the statement meets the
definition of a rule under RCW 34.05.010 and should have been adopted according
to the procedures of this chapter;
(d)
Identify any known judicial action regarding the statement or statutes
identified in the petition.
(5)
Within ninety days of receipt of the petition, the rules review committee shall
make a final decision on the rule for which the petition for review was not
previously rejected.
Sec.
8. RCW
34.05.660 and 1988 c 288 s 606 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, it is the express
policy of the legislature that establishment of procedures for review of
administrative rules by the legislature and the notice of objection required by
RCW 34.05.630(2) and 34.05.640(2) in no way serves to establish a presumption
as to the legality or constitutionality of a rule in any subsequent judicial
proceedings interpreting such rules.
(2)
If the joint administrative rules review committee recommends to the governor
that an existing rule be suspended because it does not conform with the intent
of the legislature, the recommendation shall establish a rebuttable presumption
in any proceeding challenging the validity of the rule that the rule is
invalid. The burden of demonstrating the rule's validity is then on the
adopting agency.
