CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5019

 

                   Chapter 190, Laws of 1995

 

                         (partial veto)

 

                        54th Legislature

                      1995 Regular Session

 

 

                 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SITING

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  7/23/95

Passed by the Senate April 17, 1995

  YEAS 39   NAYS 0

 

 

 

JOEL PRITCHARD

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House April 6, 1995

  YEAS 96   NAYS 0

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5019 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

  CLYDE BALLARD

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

MARTY BROWN

                            Secretary

 

 

Approved May 1, 1995, with the exception of section 2, which is vetoed. Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                FILED          

 

 

             May 1, 1995 - 11:32 a.m.

 

 

 

    MIKE LOWRY

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5019

          _______________________________________________

 

                      AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

 

             Passed Legislature - 1995 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      54th Legislature     1995 Regular Session

 

By Senator Snyder

 

Read first time 01/09/95.  Referred to Committee on Government Operations.

 

Relating to industrial developments.



    AN ACT Relating to industrial developments; adding a new section to chapter 36.70A RCW; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

    A county required or choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may establish, in consultation with cities consistent with provisions of RCW 36.70A.210, a process for reviewing and approving proposals to authorize siting of specific major industrial developments outside urban growth areas.

    (1) "Major industrial development" means a master planned location for a specific manufacturing, industrial, or commercial business that:  (a) Requires a parcel of land so large that no suitable parcels are available within an urban growth area; or (b) is a natural resource-based industry requiring a location near agricultural land, forest land, or mineral resource land upon which it is dependent.  The major industrial development shall not be for the purpose of retail commercial development or multitenant office parks.

    (2) A major industrial development may be approved outside an urban growth area in a county planning under this chapter if criteria including, but not limited to the following, are met:

    (a) New infrastructure is provided for and/or applicable impact fees are paid;

    (b) Transit-oriented site planning and traffic demand management programs are implemented;

    (c) Buffers are provided between the major industrial development and adjacent nonurban areas;

    (d) Environmental protection including air and water quality has been addressed and provided for;

    (e) Development regulations are established to ensure that urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

    (f) Provision is made to mitigate adverse impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands;

    (g) The plan for the major industrial development is consistent with the county's development regulations established for protection of critical areas; and

    (h) An inventory of developable land has been conducted and the county has determined and entered findings that land suitable to site the major industrial development is unavailable within the urban growth area.  Priority shall be given to applications for sites that are adjacent to or in close proximity to the urban growth area.

    (3) Final approval of an application for a major industrial development shall be considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070 designating the major industrial development site on the land use map as an urban growth area.  Final approval of an application for a major industrial development shall not be considered an amendment to the comprehensive plan for the purposes of RCW 36.70A.130(2) and may be considered at any time.The text of the following section has been vetoed by the Governor.  It is noted in bold italic.

 

    *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.

*Sec. 2 was vetoed.  See message at end of chapter.


    Passed the Senate April 17, 1995.

    Passed the House April 6, 1995.

Approved by the Governor May 1, 1995, with the exception of certain items which were vetoed.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 1, 1995.

 

    Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

    "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 2, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5019 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to industrial developments;"

 

    This legislation establishes a careful and appropriate process to allow counties to site large industrial facilities and to locate natural resource dependent facilities outside of urban growth areas.  The process will be advanced by a county in collaboration with its cities and requires an inventory of available land and a finding that there is not sufficient land available for such development.  It provides for infrastructure and environmental protection and establishes safeguards to prevent these developments from contributing to sprawl.

 

    This bill includes an emergency clause in section 2.  This section is ill advised when establishing a process of this nature.  The process established will take many months to complete and will require the collaborative efforts of counties and cities.  Preventing this bill from being subject to a referendum under Article II, section 1(b) of the state Constitution unnecessarily denies the people of this state their power, at their own option, to approve or reject this bill at the polls.

 

    With the exception of section 2, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5019 is approved."