CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5888

 

                   Chapter 124, Laws of 1995

 

 

                        54th Legislature

                      1995 Regular Session

 

 

  Charges for sewerage and storm water control‑-Consideration

        of nonprofit public benefit status of land user

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  7/23/95

Passed by the Senate March 14, 1995

  YEAS 44   NAYS 4

 

 

 

JOEL PRITCHARD

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House April 10, 1995

  YEAS 97   NAYS 0

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5888 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

  CLYDE BALLARD

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

MARTY BROWN

                            Secretary

 

 

Approved April 20, 1995 Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                FILED          

 

 

           April 20, 1995 - 1:17 p.m.

 

 

 

    MIKE LOWRY

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5888

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 1995 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      54th Legislature     1995 Regular Session

 

By Senator Sutherland

 

Read first time 02/13/95.  Referred to Committee on Energy, Telecommunications & Utilities.

 

Revising considerations for charges for sewerage and storm water control systems.



    AN ACT Relating to considerations for charges for sewerage and storm water control systems; and amending RCW 36.89.080, 36.94.140, 35.67.020, 35.67.190, and 35.92.020.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 36.89.080 and 1970 ex.s. c 30 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

    Any ((board of county commissioners)) county legislative authority may provide by resolution for revenues by fixing rates and charges for the furnishing of service to those served or receiving benefits or to be served or to receive benefits from any storm water control facility or contributing to an increase of surface water runoff.  In fixing rates and charges, the ((board)) county legislative authority may in its discretion consider:  (1) Services furnished or to be furnished((,)); (2) benefits received or to be received((,)); (3) the character and use of land((,)) or its water runoff characteristics; (4) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; or (5) any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.  ((Such)) The service charges and rates collected shall be deposited in a special fund or funds in the county treasury to be used only for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost and expense of maintaining and operating storm water control facilities, all or any part of the cost and expense of planning, designing, establishing, acquiring, developing, constructing and improving any of such facilities, or to pay or secure the payment of all or any portion of any issue of general obligation or revenue bonds issued for such purpose.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 36.94.140 and 1990 c 133 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    Every county, in the operation of a system of sewerage and/or water, shall have full jurisdiction and authority to manage, regulate, and control it and to fix, alter, regulate, and control the rates and charges for the service to those to whom such county service is available, and to levy charges for connection to ((such)) the system.  The rates for availability of service and connection charges so charged must be uniform for the same class of customers or service.

    In classifying customers served, service furnished or made available by such system of sewerage and/or water, or the connection charges, the ((board)) county legislative authority may consider any or all of the following factors:

    (1) The difference in cost of service to the various customers within or without the area;

    (2) The difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of the various parts of the systems;

    (3) The different character of the service furnished various customers;

    (4) The quantity and quality of the sewage and/or water delivered and the time of its delivery;

    (5) Capital contributions made to the system or systems, including, but not limited to, assessments;

    (6) The cost of acquiring the system or portions of the system in making system improvements necessary for the public health and safety; ((and))

    (7) The nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and

    (8) Any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.

    ((Such)) The service charges and rates shall produce revenues sufficient to take care of the costs of maintenance and operation, revenue bond and warrant interest and principal amortization requirements, and all other charges necessary for the efficient and proper operation of the system.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 35.67.020 and 1991 c 347 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:

    Every city and town may construct, condemn and purchase, acquire, add to, maintain, conduct, and operate systems of sewerage and systems and plants for refuse collection and disposal together with additions, extensions, and betterments thereto, within and without its limits, with full jurisdiction and authority to manage, regulate, and control them and to fix, alter, regulate, and control the rates and charges for ((the)) their use ((thereof:  PROVIDED, That)).  The rates charged must be uniform for the same class of customers or service.

    In classifying customers served or service furnished by such system of sewerage, the city or town legislative body may in its discretion consider any or all of the following factors:  (1) The difference in cost of service to the various customers; (2) the location of the various customers within and without the city or town; (3) the difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of the various parts of the system; (4) the different character of the service furnished various customers; (5) the quantity and quality of the sewage delivered and the time of its delivery; (6) the achievement of water conservation goals and the discouragement of wasteful water use practices; (7) capital contributions made to the system, including but not limited to, assessments; (8) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and (9) any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 35.67.190 and 1965 c 7 s 35.67.190 are each amended to read as follows:

    The legislative body of such city or town may provide by ordinance for revenues by fixing rates and charges for the furnishing of service to those served by its system of sewerage or system for refuse collection and disposal, which rates and charges shall be uniform for the same class of customer or service.  In classifying customers served or service furnished by such system of sewerage, the city or town legislative body may in its discretion consider any or all of the following factors:  (1) The difference in cost of service to the various customers; (2) the location of the various customers within and without the city or town; (3) the difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of the various parts of the system; (4) the different character of the service furnished various customers; (5) the quantity and quality of the sewage delivered and the time of its delivery; (6) capital contributions made to the system, including but not limited to, assessments; (7) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and (8) any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.

    If special indebtedness bonds or warrants are issued against the revenues, the legislative body shall by ordinance fix charges at rates which will be sufficient to take care of the costs of maintenance and operation, bond and warrant principal and interest, sinking fund requirements, and all other expenses necessary for efficient and proper operation of the system.

    All property owners within the area served by such sewerage system shall be compelled to connect their private drains and sewers with such city or town system, under such penalty as the legislative body of such city or town may by ordinance direct.  Such penalty may in the discretion of such legislative body be an amount equal to the charge that would be made for sewer service if the property was connected to such system.  All penalties collected shall be considered revenue of the system.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 35.92.020 and 1989 c 399 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

    A city or town may construct, condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, alter, maintain, and operate systems, plants, sites, or other facilities of sewerage, or solid waste handling as defined by RCW 70.95.030, and shall have full authority to manage, regulate, operate, control, and to fix the price of service of those systems, plants, sites, or other facilities within and without the limits of the city or town.  The rates charged shall be uniform for the same class of customers or service.  In classifying customers served or service furnished by a system or systems of sewerage, the legislative authority of the city or town may in its discretion consider any or all of the following factors:  (1) The difference in cost of service to customers; (2) the location of customers within and without the city or town; (3) the difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of the parts of the system; (4) the different character of the service furnished customers; (5) the quantity and quality of the sewage delivered and the time of its delivery; (6) capital contributions made to the systems, plants, sites, or other facilities, including but not limited to, assessments; (7) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and (8) any other factors that present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.


    Passed the Senate March 14, 1995.

    Passed the House April 10, 1995.

Approved by the Governor April 20, 1995.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State April 20, 1995.


 


                            --- END ---