1212-S AMS WEST S5360

1212-S AMS WEST S5360.1

SHB 1212 - S AMD TO GO COMM AMD (S-4850.1/98) - 920

By Senator West

On page 14, line 12 of the amendment, after "system." insert "Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the district may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs."

SHB 1212 - S AMD TO GO COMM AMD (S-4850.1/98) - 922

By Senator West

On page 62, after line 14 of the amendment, insert the following:

"Sec. 76. RCW 35.58.570 and 1996 c 230 s 1602 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) A metropolitan municipal corporation that is engaged in the transmission, treatment, and disposal of sewage may impose a capacity charge on users of the metropolitan municipal corporation's sewage facilities when the user connects, reconnects, or establishes a new service. The capacity charge shall be approved by the council of the metropolitan municipal corporation and reviewed and reapproved annually. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the metropolitan municipal corporation may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs.

(2) The capacity charge shall be based upon the cost of the sewage facilities' excess capacity that is necessary to provide sewerage treatment for new users to the system. The capacity charge, which may be collected over a period of fifteen years, shall not exceed:

(a) Seven dollars per month per residential customer equivalent for connections and reconnections occurring prior to January 1, 1996; and

(b) Ten dollars and fifty cents per month per residential customer equivalent for connections and reconnections occurring after January 1, 1996, and prior to January 1, 2001.

For connections and reconnections occurring after January 1, 2001, the capacity charge shall not exceed fifty percent of the basic sewer rate per residential customer equivalent established by the metropolitan municipal corporation at the time of the connection or reconnection.

(3) The capacity charge for a building other than a single-family residence shall be based on the projected number of residential customer equivalents to be represented by the building, considering its intended use.

(4) The council of the metropolitan municipal corporation shall enforce the collection of the capacity charge in the same manner provided for the collection, enforcement, and payment of rates and charges for water-sewer districts provided in RCW 57.08.081. At least thirty days before commencement of an action to foreclose a lien for a capacity charge, the metropolitan municipal corporation shall send written notice of delinquency in payment of the capacity charge to any first mortgage or deed of trust holder of record at the address of record.

(5) As used in this section, "sewage facilities" means capital projects identified since January 1, 1982, to July 23, 1989, in the metropolitan municipal corporation's comprehensive water pollution abatement plan. "Residential customer equivalent" shall have the same meaning used by the metropolitan municipal corporation in determining rates and charges at the time the capacity charge is imposed.

Sec. 77. RCW 35.67.020 and 1997 c 447 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:

Every city and town may construct, condemn and purchase, acquire, add to, maintain, conduct, and operate systems of sewerage and systems and plants for refuse collection and disposal together with additions, extensions, and betterments thereto, within and without its limits, with full jurisdiction and authority to manage, regulate, and control them and to fix, alter, regulate, and control the rates and charges for their use. The rates charged must be uniform for the same class of customers or service and facilities furnished. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the city or town may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs.

In classifying customers served or service and facilities furnished by such system of sewerage, the city or town legislative body may in its discretion consider any or all of the following factors: (1) The difference in cost of service and facilities to the various customers; (2) the location of the various customers within and without the city or town; (3) the difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of the various parts of the system; (4) the different character of the service and facilities furnished various customers; (5) the quantity and quality of the sewage delivered and the time of its delivery; (6) the achievement of water conservation goals and the discouragement of wasteful water use practices; (7) capital contributions made to the system, including but not limited to, assessments; (8) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and (9) any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction. Rates or charges for on-site inspection and maintenance services may not be imposed under this chapter on the development, construction, or reconstruction of property.

A city or town may provide assistance to aid low-income persons in connection with services provided under this chapter.

Under this chapter, after July 1, 1998, any requirements for pumping the septic tank of an on-site sewage system should be based, among other things, on actual measurement of accumulation of sludge and scum by a trained inspector, trained owner's agent, or trained owner. Training must occur in a program approved by the state board of health or by a local health officer.

Before adopting on-site inspection and maintenance utility services, or incorporating residences into an on-site inspection and maintenance or sewer utility under this chapter, notification must be provided, prior to the applicable public hearing, to all residences within the proposed service area that have on-site systems permitted by the local health officer. The notice must clearly state that the residence is within the proposed service area and must provide information on estimated rates or charges that may be imposed for the service.

A city or town shall not provide on-site sewage system inspection, pumping services, or other maintenance or repair services under this section using city or town employees unless the on-site system is connected by a publicly owned collection system to the city or town's sewerage system, and the on-site system represents the first step in the sewage disposal process. Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of state or local health officers to carry out their responsibilities under any other applicable law.

Sec. 78. RCW 35.91.040 and 1965 c 7 s 35.91.040 are each amended to read as follows:

No person, firm or corporation shall be granted a permit or be authorized to tap into, or use any such water or sewer facilities or extensions thereof during the period of time prescribed in such contract without first paying to the municipality, in addition to any and all other costs and charges made or assessed for such tap, or use, or for the water lines or sewers constructed in connection therewith, the amount required by the provisions of the contract under which the water or sewer facilities so tapped into or used were constructed. All amounts so received by the municipality shall be paid out by it under the terms of such contract within sixty days after the receipt thereof. Whenever any tap or connection is made into any such contracted water or sewer facilities without such payment having first been made, the governing body of the municipality may remove, or cause to be removed, such unauthorized tap or connection and all connecting tile, or pipe located in the facility right of way and dispose of unauthorized material so removed without any liability whatsoever. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the municipality may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs.

Sec. 79. RCW 35.92.020 and 1997 c 447 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

A city or town may construct, condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, alter, maintain, and operate systems, plants, sites, or other facilities of sewerage as defined in RCW 35.67.010, or solid waste handling as defined by RCW 70.95.030, and shall have full authority to manage, regulate, operate, control, and to fix the price of service and facilities of those systems, plants, sites, or other facilities within and without the limits of the city or town. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the city or town may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs. The rates charged shall be uniform for the same class of customers or service and facilities. In classifying customers served or service and facilities furnished by a system or systems of sewerage, the legislative authority of the city or town may in its discretion consider any or all of the following factors: (1) The difference in cost of service and facilities to customers; (2) the location of customers within and without the city or town; (3) the difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of the parts of the system; (4) the different character of the service and facilities furnished to customers; (5) the quantity and quality of the sewage delivered and the time of its delivery; (6) capital contributions made to the systems, plants, sites, or other facilities, including but not limited to, assessments; (7) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and (8) any other factors that present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction. Rates or charges for on-site inspection and maintenance services may not be imposed under this chapter on the development, construction, or reconstruction of property.

A city or town may provide assistance to aid low-income persons in connection with services provided under this chapter.

Sec. 80. RCW 36.89.080 and 1995 c 124 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

Any county legislative authority may provide by resolution for revenues by fixing rates and charges for the furnishing of service to those served or receiving benefits or to be served or to receive benefits from any storm water control facility or contributing to an increase of surface water runoff. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the county legislative authority may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs. In fixing rates and charges, the county legislative authority may in its discretion consider: (1) Services furnished or to be furnished; (2) benefits received or to be received; (3) the character and use of land or its water runoff characteristics; (4) the nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; or (5) any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction. The service charges and rates collected shall be deposited in a special fund or funds in the county treasury to be used only for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost and expense of maintaining and operating storm water control facilities, all or any part of the cost and expense of planning, designing, establishing, acquiring, developing, constructing and improving any of such facilities, or to pay or secure the payment of all or any portion of any issue of general obligation or revenue bonds issued for such purpose.

Sec. 81. RCW 36.94.140 and 1997 c 447 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:

Every county, in the operation of a system of sewerage and/or water, shall have full jurisdiction and authority to manage, regulate, and control it and to fix, alter, regulate, and control the rates and charges for the service and facilities to those to whom such service and facilities are available, and to levy charges for connection to the system. The rates for availability of service and facilities, and connection charges so charged must be uniform for the same class of customers or service and facility. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the county may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs.

In classifying customers served, service furnished or made available by such system of sewerage and/or water, or the connection charges, the county legislative authority may consider any or all of the following factors:

(1) The difference in cost of service to the various customers within or without the area;

(2) The difference in cost of maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of the various parts of the systems;

(3) The different character of the service and facilities furnished various customers;

(4) The quantity and quality of the sewage and/or water delivered and the time of its delivery;

(5) Capital contributions made to the system or systems, including, but not limited to, assessments;

(6) The cost of acquiring the system or portions of the system in making system improvements necessary for the public health and safety;

(7) The nonprofit public benefit status, as defined in RCW 24.03.490, of the land user; and

(8) Any other matters which present a reasonable difference as a ground for distinction.

A county may provide assistance to aid low-income persons in connection with services provided under this chapter.

The service charges and rates shall produce revenues sufficient to take care of the costs of maintenance and operation, revenue bond and warrant interest and principal amortization requirements, and all other charges necessary for the efficient and proper operation of the system.

Sec. 82. RCW 53.08.040 and 1989 c 298 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

A district may improve its lands by dredging, filling, bulkheading, providing waterways or otherwise developing such lands for industrial and commercial purposes. A district may also acquire, construct, install, improve, and operate sewer and water utilities to serve its own property and other property owners under terms, conditions, and rates to be fixed and approved by the port commission. A district may also acquire, by purchase, construction, lease, or in any other manner, and may maintain and operate other facilities for the control or elimination of air, water, or other pollution, including, but not limited to, facilities for the treatment and/or disposal of industrial wastes, and may make such facilities available to others under terms, conditions and rates to be fixed and approved by the port commission. Any capital costs or capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and the district may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs. Such conditions and rates shall be sufficient to reimburse the port for all costs, including reasonable amortization of capital outlays caused by or incidental to providing such other pollution control facilities: PROVIDED, That no part of such costs of providing any pollution control facility to others shall be paid out of any tax revenues of the port: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That no port shall enter into an agreement or contract to provide sewer and/or water utilities or pollution control facilities if substantially similar utilities or facilities are available from another source (or sources) which is able and willing to provide such utilities or facilities on a reasonable and nondiscriminatory basis unless such other source (or sources) consents thereto.

In the event that a port elects to make such other pollution control facilities available to others, it shall do so by lease, lease purchase agreement, or other agreement binding such user to pay for the use of said facilities for the full term of the revenue bonds issued by the port for the acquisition of said facilities, and said payments shall at least fully reimburse the port for all principal and interest paid by it on said bonds and for all operating or other costs, if any, incurred by the port in connection with said facilities: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That where there is more than one user of any such facilities, each user shall be responsible for its pro rata share of such costs and payment of principal and interest. Any port intending to provide pollution control facilities to others shall first survey the port district to ascertain the potential users of such facilities and the extent of their needs. The port shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposal and shall give each potential user an opportunity to participate in the use of such facilities upon equal terms and conditions.

Sec. 83. RCW 82.02.020 and 1997 c 452 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:

Except only as expressly provided in chapters 67.28 and 82.14 RCW, the state preempts the field of imposing taxes upon retail sales of tangible personal property, the use of tangible personal property, parimutuel wagering authorized pursuant to RCW 67.16.060, conveyances, and cigarettes, and no county, town, or other municipal subdivision shall have the right to impose taxes of that nature. Except as provided in RCW 82.02.050 through 82.02.090, no county, city, town, or other municipal corporation shall impose any tax, fee, or charge, either direct or indirect, on the construction or reconstruction of residential buildings, commercial buildings, industrial buildings, or on any other building or building space or appurtenance thereto, or on the development, subdivision, classification, or reclassification of land. However, this section does not preclude dedications of land or easements within the proposed development or plat which the county, city, town, or other municipal corporation can demonstrate are reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or plat to which the dedication of land or easement is to apply.

This section does not prohibit voluntary agreements with counties, cities, towns, or other municipal corporations that allow a payment in lieu of a dedication of land or to mitigate a direct impact that has been identified as a consequence of a proposed development, subdivision, or plat. A local government shall not use such voluntary agreements for local off-site transportation improvements within the geographic boundaries of the area or areas covered by an adopted transportation program authorized by chapter 39.92 RCW. Any such voluntary agreement is subject to the following provisions:

(1) The payment shall be held in a reserve account and may only be expended to fund a capital improvement agreed upon by the parties to mitigate the identified, direct impact;

(2) The payment shall be expended in all cases within five years of collection; and

(3) Any payment not so expended shall be refunded with interest at the rate applied to judgments to the property owners of record at the time of the refund; however, if the payment is not expended within five years due to delay attributable to the developer, the payment shall be refunded without interest.

No county, city, town, or other municipal corporation shall require any payment as part of such a voluntary agreement which the county, city, town, or other municipal corporation cannot establish is reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or plat.

Nothing in this section prohibits cities, towns, counties, or other municipal corporations from collecting reasonable fees from an applicant for a permit or other governmental approval to cover the cost to the city, town, county, or other municipal corporation of processing applications, inspecting and reviewing plans, or preparing detailed statements required by chapter 43.21C RCW.

This section does not limit the existing authority of any county, city, town, or other municipal corporation to impose special assessments on property specifically benefitted thereby in the manner prescribed by law.

Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from imposing or permits counties, cities, or towns to impose water, sewer, natural gas, drainage utility, and drainage system charges: PROVIDED, That ((~~no such charge shall exceed the proportionate share of~~)) such utility or system's capital costs ((which the county, city, or town can demonstrate are attributable to the property being charged: PROVIDED FURTHER, That these provisions shall not be interpreted to expand or contract any existing authority of counties, cities, or towns to impose such charges)) or any capacity charges must be recovered using rate-based user charges and such utility or system may not charge hookup fees that are above actual physical connection costs.

Nothing in this section prohibits a transportation benefit district from imposing fees or charges authorized in RCW 36.73.120 nor prohibits the legislative authority of a county, city, or town from approving the imposition of such fees within a transportation benefit district.

Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from imposing transportation impact fees authorized pursuant to chapter 39.92 RCW.

Nothing in this section prohibits counties, cities, or towns from requiring property owners to provide relocation assistance to tenants under RCW 59.18.440 and 59.18.450.

This section does not apply to special purpose districts formed and acting pursuant to Titles 54, 57, or 87 RCW, nor is the authority conferred by these titles affected."

Renumber the remaining section consecutively.

SHB 1212 - S AMD TO GO COMM AMD (S-4850.1/98) - 920

By Senator West

On page 62, beginning on line 32 of the title amendment, after "87.03.720," strike "and 87.03.725" and insert "87.03.725, 35.58.570, 35.67.020, 35.91.040, 35.92.020, 36.89.080, 36.94.140, 53.08.040, and 82.02.020"