HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 SSB 5782

                       As Passed House

                       April 14, 1997

Title:  An act relating to bid requirements for water‑sewer districts.

Brief Description:  Changing bidding for water‑sewer districts.

Sponsors:  Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Swecker, Haugen, Rasmussen and Fraser).

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Government Administration:  4/1/97, 4/4/97 [DP].

Floor Activity:

Passed House:  4/14/97, 94‑3.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION

Majority Report:  Do pass.  Signed by 13 members:  Representatives D. Schmidt, Chairman; D. Sommers, Vice Chairman; Scott, Ranking Minority Member; Gardner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Doumit; Dunn; Dunshee; Murray; Reams; Smith; L. Thomas; Wensman and Wolfe.

Staff:  Bill Lynch (786-7092).

Background:  Water-sewer districts must follow certain procedures when awarding contracts for purchases or public works.  If a contract for a public works project has an estimated value of more than $5,000 it must be let by contract.  If a contract for the purchase of materials, supplies, or equipment has an estimated value of more than $10,000, it must be awarded by contract.  If the contract for purchases has an estimated value of $5,000 to less than $50,000, it may be awarded pursuant to either a small works roster process or formal competitive bidding.  It has been suggested that these thresholds should be adjusted.

Summary of Bill:  The threshold for requiring a public works project to be let by contract is raised from $5,000 to $10,000.  A water-sewer district may use the uniform process to award contracts for purchases when the contract has an estimated cost from $10,000 to less than $50,000.

The cost of a project is the aggregate amount to be paid for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment of a continuous or interrelated project if the work is to be performed simultaneously or in close sequence.

Appropriation:  None.

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  The cost of contract administration is growing.  It is necessary to adjust these limits periodically.

Testimony Against:  In-house limits should not be increased because government should use the public sector for this work.

Testified:  (Pro)  Steve Lindstrom, Sno-King Water District Coalition; and Joe Daniels, Washington Association of Sewer/Water Districts.  (Con/amendments) Larry Stevens, United Subcontractors Association; and Dick Ducharme, Utility Contractors.