SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6421
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Commerce & Labor, February 2, 1998
Title: An act relating to unemployment compensation for persons with public employment contracts.
Brief Description: Revising unemployment compensation for persons with public employment contracts.
Sponsors: Senators Schow, Heavey and Winsley; by request of Employment Security Department.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Commerce & Labor: 1/19/98, 2/2/98 [DPS, DNPS].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6421 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Schow, Chair; Horn, Vice Chair; Anderson and Newhouse.
Minority Report: Do not pass substitute.
Signed by Senators Franklin, Fraser and Heavey.
Staff: Patrick Woods (786-7430)
Background: In order to receive unemployment insurance (UI) benefits in Washington, a person must be unemployed and available for work. In addition, there are specific criteria in the statute regarding any work related Aremuneration@ that a claimant may receive for services rendered.
In certain instances employers provide financial settlements when employees are laid-off. How these settlements or severance packages are structured can affect a laid-off worker=s eligibility for UI benefits. Under the existing statute, a claimant in either the public or private sector is considered to have received Aremuneration@ and therefore denied unemployment insurance benefits if: a) the individual is receiving previously accrued compensation during a non-work period and that compensation is considered payment for that period; or b) the payments make the person eligible for regular fringe benefits. As an example, these requirements would prevent an individual that is separated from an employer but using up his or her vacation pay from receiving UI benefits.
In private sector employment certain payments, such as negotiated settlements for termination of an employment contract, may not be considered remuneration for the purposes of unemployment insurance and, if so, the claimants are eligible to receive UI benefits. However, as a result of legislative action in 1995 (SHB 1821), employees in the public sector that receive similar severance pay arrangements are not considered eligible to receive UI benefits.
During 1997 the U.S. Department of Labor determined that this statute is potentially out of conformity with the federal unemployment law, because it treats public employees differently from those in the private sector. If Washington is found out of conformity with federal law, Washington employers will lose an estimated $872 million in tax credits. In addition, the state will not receive approximately $80 million in administrative funding for the Department of Employment Security.
Summary of Substitute Bill: The state=s federal conformity issues regarding unemployment insurance are addressed. The unemployment insurance law is modified to provide equal treatment for public and private sector employees. As a result, public and private sector employees that receive severance pay are not eligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill: The substitute provides for conformity with the federal standards by making both public and private sector employees that receive payment as a part of a negotiated settlement for termination of an employment contract are both ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 15, 1998.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The bill is needed to address a federal conformity issue.
Testimony Against: Instead of addressing the federal conformity issue by making public sector employees that receive payments as a part of a negotiated settlement for termination of an employment contract eligible for UI benefits, make private sector employers conform to the current standard for public employees. This will make both public and private sector employees that receive those ineligible for UI benefits.
Testified: Dale Zigler, ESD (pro); Norm Raffaell, Clif Finch, AWB.