H-4157.1  _______________________________________________

 

                          HOUSE BILL 2777

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      55th Legislature     1998 Regular Session

 

By Representatives Carrell, Sheahan, Lambert, Chandler, Mielke, Mulliken, Boldt, Zellinsky, McMorris, Backlund, Alexander, Bush, Clements, McCune, Sherstad and Talcott

 

Read first time 01/20/98.  Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

Clarifying the lawful use of force.


    AN ACT Relating to defenses in civil actions and the lawful use of force when defending against criminal acts; and amending RCW 4.24.420, 9A.16.020, and 9A.16.110.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 4.24.420 and 1987 c 212 s 901 are each amended to read as follows:

    It is a complete defense to any action for damages for personal injury or wrongful death that the person injured or killed was engaged in the commission of a felony, a gross misdemeanor, or a misdemeanor at the time of the occurrence causing the injury or death and the felony, the gross misdemeanor, or the misdemeanor was a proximate cause of the injury or death.  However, nothing in this section shall affect a right of action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, nor shall anything in this section affect a right of action under the common law doctrine of attractive nuisance when the only offense committed or intended to be committed is trespass.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 9A.16.020 and 1986 c 149 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    The use, attempt, or offer to use force upon or toward the person of another is not unlawful in the following cases:

    (1) Whenever necessarily used by a public officer in the performance of a legal duty, or a person assisting the officer and acting under the officer's direction;

    (2) Whenever necessarily used by a person arresting one who has committed a felony, a gross misdemeanor, or a misdemeanor and delivering him or her to a public officer competent to receive him or her into custody;

    (3) Whenever used by a party about to be injured, or by another lawfully aiding him or her, in preventing or attempting to prevent an offense against his or her person, or a malicious trespass, or other malicious interference with real or personal property lawfully in his or her possession, in case the force is not more than is necessary;

    (4) Whenever reasonably used by a person to detain someone who enters or remains unlawfully in a building or on real property lawfully in the possession of such person, so long as such detention is reasonable in duration and manner to investigate the reason for the detained person's presence on the premises, and so long as the premises in question did not reasonably appear to be intended to be open to members of the public;

    (5) Whenever used by a carrier of passengers or the carrier's authorized agent or servant, or other person assisting them at their request in expelling from a carriage, railway car, vessel, or other vehicle, a passenger who refuses to obey a lawful and reasonable regulation prescribed for the conduct of passengers, if such vehicle has first been stopped and the force used is not more than is necessary to expel the offender with reasonable regard to the offender's personal safety;

    (6) Whenever used by any person to prevent a mentally ill, mentally incompetent, or mentally disabled person from committing an act dangerous to any person, or in enforcing necessary restraint for the protection or restoration to health of the person, during such period only as is necessary to obtain legal authority for the restraint or custody of the person.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 9A.16.110 and 1995 c 44 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) No person in the state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting by any reasonable means necessary, himself or herself, his or her family, or his or her real or personal property, or for coming to the aid of another who is in imminent danger of or the victim of ((assault, robbery, kidnapping, arson, burglary, rape, murder, or any other violent crime as defined in RCW 9.94A.030)) a felony, a gross misdemeanor, or a misdemeanor.

    (2) When a person charged with a crime listed in subsection (1) of this section is found not guilty by reason of self-defense, the state of Washington shall reimburse the defendant for all reasonable costs, including loss of time, legal fees incurred, and other expenses involved in his or her defense.  This reimbursement is not an independent cause of action.  To award these reasonable costs the trier of fact must find that the defendant's claim of self-defense was sustained by a preponderance of the evidence.  If the trier of fact makes a determination of self-defense, the judge shall determine the amount of the award.

    (3) Notwithstanding a finding that a defendant's actions were justified by self-defense, if the trier of fact also determines that the defendant was engaged in criminal conduct substantially related to the events giving rise to the charges filed against the defendant the judge may deny or reduce the amount of the award.  In determining the amount of the award, the judge shall also consider the seriousness of the initial criminal conduct.

    Nothing in this section precludes the legislature from using the sundry claims process to grant an award where none was granted under this section or to grant a higher award than one granted under this section.

    (4) Whenever the issue of self-defense under this section is decided by a judge, the judge shall consider the same questions as must be answered in the special verdict under subsection (((4) [(5)])) (5) of this section.

    (5) Whenever the issue of self-defense under this section has been submitted to a jury, and the jury has found the defendant not guilty, the court shall instruct the jury to return a special verdict in substantially the following form:

 

                                                            answer 

                                                         yes or no

    1. Was the finding of not guilty based upon self‑defense?                                             . . . . .

    2. If your answer to question 1 is no, do not answer the remaining question.

    3. If your answer to question 1 is yes, was the defendant:

    a. Protecting himself or herself?                  . . . . .

    b. Protecting his or her family?                   . . . . .

    c. Protecting his or her property?                 . . . . .

    d. Coming to the aid of another who was in imminent danger of a ((heinous)) crime?                      . . . . .

    e. Coming to the aid of another who was the victim of a ((heinous)) crime?                           . . . . .

    f. Engaged in criminal conduct substantially related to the events giving rise to the

           crime with which the defendant is charged?     . . . . .

 

 

 


                            --- END ---