H-3915.1  _______________________________________________

 

                          HOUSE BILL 2937

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      55th Legislature     1998 Regular Session

 

By Representatives Dyer, Backlund, Skinner and Sherstad

 

Read first time 01/23/98.  Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

Concerning the waiver of the physician-patient privilege in a health care suit.


    AN ACT Relating to equal access to medical witnesses; amending RCW 5.60.060 and 70.02.050; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 5.60.060 and 1997 c 338 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) A husband shall not be examined for or against his wife, without the consent of the wife, nor a wife for or against her husband without the consent of the husband; nor can either during marriage or afterward, be without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during marriage.  But this exception shall not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding against a spouse if the marriage occurred subsequent to the filing of formal charges against the defendant, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by said husband or wife against any child of whom said husband or wife is the parent or guardian, nor to a proceeding under chapter 70.96A or 71.05 RCW:  PROVIDED, That the spouse of a person sought to be detained under chapter 70.96A or 71.05 RCW may not be compelled to testify and shall be so informed by the court prior to being called as a witness.

    (2)(a) An attorney or counselor shall not, without the consent of his or her client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to him or her, or his or her advice given thereon in the course of professional employment.

    (b) A parent or guardian of a minor child arrested on a criminal charge may not be examined as to a communication between the child and his or her attorney if the communication was made in the presence of the parent or guardian.  This privilege does not extend to communications made prior to the arrest.

    (3) A member of the clergy or a priest shall not, without the consent of a person making the confession, be examined as to any confession made to him or her in his or her professional character, in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which he or she belongs.

    (4) Subject to the limitations under RCW 70.96A.140 or 71.05.250, a physician or surgeon or osteopathic physician or surgeon shall not, without the consent of his or her patient, be examined in a civil action as to any information acquired in attending such patient, which was necessary to enable him or her to prescribe or act for the patient, except as follows:

    (a) In any judicial proceedings regarding a child's injury, neglect, or sexual abuse or the cause thereof; and

    (b) Ninety days after filing an action for personal injuries or wrongful death, the claimant shall be deemed to waive the physician-patient privilege.  Waiver of the physician-patient privilege for any one physician or condition constitutes a waiver of the privilege as to all physicians or conditions, subject to such limitations as a court may impose pursuant to court rules.  Where the privilege has been waived under this section, ex parte interviews with such physicians may be conducted in the same manner as with any other witness.

    (5) A public officer shall not be examined as a witness as to communications made to him or her in official confidence, when the public interest would suffer by the disclosure.

    (6)(a) A peer support group counselor shall not, without consent of the law enforcement officer making the communication, be compelled to testify about any communication made to the counselor by the officer while receiving counseling.  The counselor must be designated as such by the sheriff, police chief, or chief of the Washington state patrol, prior to the incident that results in counseling.  The privilege only applies when the communication was made to the counselor while acting in his or her capacity as a peer support group counselor.  The privilege does not apply if the counselor was an initial responding officer, a witness, or a party to the incident which prompted the delivery of peer support group counseling services to the law enforcement officer.

    (b) For purposes of this section, "peer support group counselor" means a:

    (i) Law enforcement officer, or civilian employee of a law enforcement agency, who has received training to provide emotional and moral support and counseling to an officer who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the officer was involved while acting in his or her official capacity; or

    (ii) Nonemployee counselor who has been designated by the sheriff, police chief, or chief of the Washington state patrol to provide emotional and moral support and counseling to an officer who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the officer was involved while acting in his or her official capacity.

    (7) A sexual assault advocate may not, without the consent of the victim, be examined as to any communication made by the victim to the sexual assault advocate.

    (a) For purposes of this section, "sexual assault advocate" means the employee or volunteer from a rape crisis center, victim assistance unit, program, or association, that provides information, medical or legal advocacy, counseling, or support to victims of sexual assault, who is designated by the victim to accompany the victim to the hospital or other health care facility and to proceedings concerning the alleged assault, including police and prosecution interviews and court proceedings.

    (b) A sexual assault advocate may disclose a confidential communication without the consent of the victim if failure to disclose is likely to result in a clear, imminent risk of serious physical injury or death of the victim or another person.  Any sexual assault advocate participating in good faith in the disclosing of records and communications under this section shall have immunity from any liability, civil, criminal, or otherwise, that might result from the action.  In any proceeding, civil or criminal, arising out of a disclosure under this section, the good faith of the sexual assault advocate who disclosed the confidential communication shall be presumed.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 70.02.050 and 1993 c 448 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) A health care provider may disclose health care information about a patient without the patient's authorization to the extent a recipient needs to know the information, if the disclosure is:

    (a) To a person who the provider reasonably believes is providing health care to the patient;

    (b) To any other person who requires health care information for health care education, or to provide planning, quality assurance, peer review, or administrative, legal, financial, or actuarial services to the health care provider; or for assisting the health care provider in the delivery of health care and the health care provider reasonably believes that the person:

    (i) Will not use or disclose the health care information for any other purpose; and

    (ii) Will take appropriate steps to protect the health care information;

    (c) To any other health care provider reasonably believed to have previously provided health care to the patient, to the extent necessary to provide health care to the patient, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider in writing not to make the disclosure;

    (d) To any person if the health care provider reasonably believes that disclosure will avoid or minimize an imminent danger to the health or safety of the patient or any other individual, however there is no obligation under this chapter on the part of the provider to so disclose;

    (e) Oral, and made to immediate family members of the patient, or any other individual with whom the patient is known to have a close personal relationship, if made in accordance with good medical or other professional practice, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider in writing not to make the disclosure;

    (f) To a health care provider who is the successor in interest to the health care provider maintaining the health care information;

    (g) For use in a research project that an institutional review board has determined:

    (i) Is of sufficient importance to outweigh the intrusion into the privacy of the patient that would result from the disclosure;

    (ii) Is impracticable without the use or disclosure of the health care information in individually identifiable form;

    (iii) Contains reasonable safeguards to protect the information from redisclosure;

    (iv) Contains reasonable safeguards to protect against identifying, directly or indirectly, any patient in any report of the research project; and

    (v) Contains procedures to remove or destroy at the earliest opportunity, consistent with the purposes of the project, information that would enable the patient to be identified, unless an institutional review board authorizes retention of identifying information for purposes of another research project;

    (h) To a person who obtains information for purposes of an audit, if that person agrees in writing to:

    (i) Remove or destroy, at the earliest opportunity consistent with the purpose of the audit, information that would enable the patient to be identified; and

    (ii) Not to disclose the information further, except to accomplish the audit or report unlawful or improper conduct involving fraud in payment for health care by a health care provider or patient, or other unlawful conduct by the health care provider;

    (i) To an official of a penal or other custodial institution in which the patient is detained;

    (j) To provide directory information, unless the patient has instructed the health care provider not to make the disclosure;

    (k) In the case of a hospital or health care provider to provide, in cases reported by fire, police, sheriff, or other public authority, name, residence, sex, age, occupation, condition, diagnosis, or extent and location of injuries as determined by a physician, and whether the patient was conscious when admitted; or

    (l) Made after a deemed waiver of the physician-patient privilege under RCW 5.60.060(4)(b).

    (2) A health care provider shall disclose health care information about a patient without the patient's authorization if the disclosure is:

    (a) To federal, state, or local public health authorities, to the extent the health care provider is required by law to report health care information; when needed to determine compliance with state or federal licensure, certification or registration rules or laws; or when needed to protect the public health;

    (b) To federal, state, or local law enforcement authorities to the extent the health care provider is required by law;

    (c) Pursuant to compulsory process in accordance with RCW 70.02.060.

    (3) All state or local agencies obtaining patient health care information pursuant to this section shall adopt rules establishing their record acquisition, retention, and security policies that are consistent with this chapter.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  RCW 5.60.060 and 70.02.050 do not apply to claims, hearings, appeals, or any other proceedings under Title 51 RCW.

 


                            --- END ---