CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2089

 

 

                   Chapter 356, Laws of 1997

 

                         (partial veto)

 

 

 

                        55th Legislature

                      1997 Regular Session

 

 

LIVESTOCK IDENTIFICATION--FEES

 

 

 

EFFECTIVE DATE:  Sections 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 become effective 7/1/97; and sections 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 become effective 7/1/98.

Passed by the House April 21, 1997

  Yeas 96   Nays 1

 

 

 

             CLYDE BALLARD

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate April 16, 1997

  Yeas 48   Nays 1

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Timothy A. Martin, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2089  as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

             IRV NEWHOUSE

President of the Senate

          TIMOTHY A. MARTIN

                          Chief Clerk

 

 

Approved May 14, 1997, with the exception of section 1, which is vetoed.Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.   

                                FILED          

 

 

             May 14, 1997 - 2:07 p.m.

 

 

 

              GARY LOCKE

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2089

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 1997 Regular Session

 

                     AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

 

                                

State of Washington      55th Legislature     1997 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Agriculture & Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Chandler and Honeyford)

 

Read first time 03/05/97.

  Identifying livestock.   


    AN ACT Relating to identification of livestock; amending RCW 16.57.015, 16.57.220, 16.57.220, 16.58.050, 16.58.050, 16.58.130, 16.58.130, 16.65.037, 16.65.037, 16.65.090, and 16.65.090; providing effective dates; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    *Sec. 1.  RCW 16.57.015 and 1993 c 354 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The director shall establish a livestock identification advisory board.  The board shall be composed of six members appointed by the director.  One member shall represent each of the following groups:  Beef producers, public livestock market operators, horse owners, dairy farmers, cattle feeders, and meat processors.  In making appointments, the director shall solicit nominations from organizations representing these groups state-wide.

    (2) The purpose of the board is to provide oversight of the livestock identification programs and advice to the director regarding livestock identification programs administered under this chapter and regarding brand inspection fees and related licensing fees.  The board shall meet at least once every two months to receive a program status briefing from the department, including a financial update and any other financial information requested by the board, in order to provide guidance to the department on the operation of the programs.  The director shall consult the board before hiring or dismissing supervisory personnel, adopting, amending, or repealing a rule under this chapter or altering a fee under RCW 16.58.050, 16.58.130, 16.65.030, or 16.65.090.  If the director publishes in the state register a proposed rule to be adopted under the authority of this chapter or a proposed rule setting a fee under RCW 16.58.050, 16.58.130, 16.65.030, or 16.65.090 and the rule has not received the approval of the advisory board, the director shall file with the board a written statement setting forth the director's reasons for proposing the rule without the board's approval.

    (3) The members of the advisory board serve three-year terms.  However, the director shall by rule provide shorter initial terms for some of the members of the board to stagger the expiration of the initial terms.  The members serve without compensation.  The director may authorize the expenses of a member to be reimbursed if the member is selected to attend a regional or national conference or meeting regarding livestock identification.  Any such reimbursement shall be in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.

*Sec. 1 was vetoed.  See message at end of chapter.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 16.57.220 and 1995 c 374 s 49 are each amended to read as follows:

    The director shall cause a charge to be made for all brand inspection of cattle and horses required under this chapter and rules adopted hereunder.  Such charges shall be paid to the department by the owner or person in possession unless requested by the purchaser and then such brand inspection shall be paid by the purchaser requesting such brand inspection.  Except as provided by rule, such inspection charges shall be due and payable at the time brand inspection is performed and shall be paid upon billing by the department and if not shall constitute a prior lien on the cattle or cattle hides or horses or horse hides brand inspected until such charge is paid.  The director in order to best utilize the services of the department in performing brand inspection may establish schedules by days and hours when a brand inspector will be on duty to perform brand inspection at established inspection points.  The fees for brand inspection performed at inspection points according to schedules established by the director shall be ((sixty)) seventy-five cents per head for cattle and not more than ((two)) three dollars ((and forty cents)) per head for horses as prescribed by the director subsequent to a hearing under chapter 34.05 RCW and in conformance with RCW 16.57.015.  Fees for brand inspection of cattle and horses at points other than those designated by the director or not in accord with the schedules established by the director shall be based on a fee schedule not to exceed actual net cost to the department of performing the brand inspection service.  For the purpose of this section, actual costs shall mean fifteen dollars per hour and the current mileage rate set by the office of financial management.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 16.57.220 and 1997 c . . . s 2 (section 2 of this act) are each amended to read as follows:

    The director shall cause a charge to be made for all brand inspection of cattle and horses required under this chapter and rules adopted hereunder.  Such charges shall be paid to the department by the owner or person in possession unless requested by the purchaser and then such brand inspection shall be paid by the purchaser requesting such brand inspection.  Except as provided by rule, such inspection charges shall be due and payable at the time brand inspection is performed and shall be paid upon billing by the department and if not shall constitute a prior lien on the cattle or cattle hides or horses or horse hides brand inspected until such charge is paid.  The director in order to best utilize the services of the department in performing brand inspection may establish schedules by days and hours when a brand inspector will be on duty to perform brand inspection at established inspection points.  The fees for brand inspection performed at inspection points according to schedules established by the director shall be ((seventy-five)) sixty cents per head for cattle and not more than ((three)) two dollars and forty cents per head for horses as prescribed by the director subsequent to a hearing under chapter 34.05 RCW and in conformance with RCW 16.57.015.  Fees for brand inspection of cattle and horses at points other than those designated by the director or not in accord with the schedules established by the director shall be based on a fee schedule not to exceed actual net cost to the department of performing the brand inspection service.  For the purpose of this section, actual costs shall mean fifteen dollars per hour and the current mileage rate set by the office of financial management.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 16.58.050 and 1994 c 46 s 23 are each amended to read as follows:

    The application for an annual license to engage in the business of operating one or more certified feed lots shall be accompanied by a license fee of ((six)) seven hundred fifty dollars.  Upon approval of the application by the director and compliance with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted hereunder, the applicant shall be issued a license or a renewal thereof.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 16.58.050 and 1997 c . . . s 4 (section 4 of this act) are each amended to read as follows:

    The application for an annual license to engage in the business of operating one or more certified feed lots shall be accompanied by a license fee of ((seven)) six hundred ((fifty)) dollars.  Upon approval of the application by the director and compliance with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted hereunder, the applicant shall be issued a license or a renewal thereof.

 

    Sec. 6.  RCW 16.58.130 and 1994 c 46 s 24 are each amended to read as follows:

    Each licensee shall pay to the director a fee of ((twelve)) fifteen cents for each head of cattle handled through the licensee's feed lot.  Payment of such fee shall be made by the licensee on a monthly basis.  Failure to pay as required shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of a certified feed lot license.  Further, the director shall not renew a certified feed lot license if a licensee has failed to make prompt and timely payments.

 

    Sec. 7.  RCW 16.58.130 and 1997 c . . . s 6 (section 6 of this act) are each amended to read as follows:

    Each licensee shall pay to the director a fee of ((fifteen)) twelve cents for each head of cattle handled through the licensee's feed lot.  Payment of such fee shall be made by the licensee on a monthly basis.  Failure to pay as required shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of a certified feed lot license.  Further, the director shall not renew a certified feed lot license if a licensee has failed to make prompt and timely payments.

 

    Sec. 8.  RCW 16.65.037 and 1995 c 374 s 57 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Upon the approval of the application by the director and compliance with the provisions of this chapter, the applicant shall be issued a license or renewal thereof.  Any license issued under the provisions of this chapter shall only be valid at location and for the sales day or days for which the license was issued.

    (2) The license fee shall be based on the average gross sales volume per official sales day of that market:

    (a) Markets with an average gross sales volume up to and including ten thousand dollars, a one hundred ((twenty)) fifty dollar fee;

    (b) Markets with an average gross sales volume over ten thousand dollars and up to and including fifty thousand dollars, a ((two)) three hundred ((forty)) fifty dollar fee; and

    (c) Markets with an average gross sales volume over fifty thousand dollars, a ((three)) four hundred ((sixty)) fifty dollar fee.

    The fees for public market licenses shall be set by the director by rule subsequent to a hearing under chapter 34.05 RCW and in conformance with RCW 16.57.015.

    (3) Any applicant operating more than one public livestock market shall make a separate application for a license to operate each such public livestock market, and each such application shall be accompanied by the appropriate application fee.

 

    Sec. 9.  RCW 16.65.037 and 1997 c . . . s 8 (section 8 of this act) are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Upon the approval of the application by the director and compliance with the provisions of this chapter, the applicant shall be issued a license or renewal thereof.  Any license issued under the provisions of this chapter shall only be valid at location and for the sales day or days for which the license was issued.

    (2) The license fee shall be based on the average gross sales volume per official sales day of that market:

    (a) Markets with an average gross sales volume up to and including ten thousand dollars, a one hundred ((fifty)) twenty dollar fee;

    (b) Markets with an average gross sales volume over ten thousand dollars and up to and including fifty thousand dollars, a ((three)) two hundred ((fifty)) forty dollar fee; and

    (c) Markets with an average gross sales volume over fifty thousand dollars, a ((four)) three hundred ((fifty)) sixty dollar fee.

    The fees for public market licenses shall be set by the director by rule subsequent to a hearing under chapter 34.05 RCW and in conformance with RCW 16.57.015.

    (3) Any applicant operating more than one public livestock market shall make a separate application for a license to operate each such public livestock market, and each such application shall be accompanied by the appropriate application fee.

 

    Sec. 10.  RCW 16.65.090 and 1994 c 46 s 22 are each amended to read as follows:

    The director shall provide for brand inspection.  When such brand inspection is required the licensee shall collect from the consignor and pay to the department, as provided by law, a fee for brand inspection for each animal consigned to the public livestock market or special open consignment horse sale((:  PROVIDED, That)).  However, if in any one sale day the total fees collected for brand inspection do not exceed ((seventy-two)) ninety dollars, then such licensee shall pay ((seventy-two)) ninety dollars for such brand inspection or as much thereof as the director may prescribe.

 

    Sec. 11.  RCW 16.65.090 and 1997 c . . . s 10 (section 10 of this act) are each amended to read as follows:

    The director shall provide for brand inspection.  When such brand inspection is required the licensee shall collect from the consignor and pay to the department, as provided by law, a fee for brand inspection for each animal consigned to the public livestock market or special open consignment horse sale.  However, if in any one sale day the total fees collected for brand inspection do not exceed ((ninety)) seventy-two dollars, then such licensee shall pay ((ninety)) seventy-two dollars for such brand inspection or as much thereof as the director may prescribe.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12.  (1) Sections 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect July 1, 1997.

    (2) Sections 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 of this act take effect July 1, 1998.


    Passed the House April 21, 1997.

    Passed the Senate April 16, 1997.

Approved by the Governor May 14, 1997, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 14, 1997.


 

    Note:  Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

    "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 1, Substitute House Bill No. 2089 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to identification of livestock;"

 

    Substitute House Bill No. 2089 evolved from an ongoing effort among the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") and various sectors of the livestock industry to agree on a combination of fees and responsibilities for operating the Livestock Identification Program.

 

    SHB 2089 maintains fees charged by the Livestock Identification Advisory Board at their current level until July 1, 1998.  This will allow the parties to continue efforts to resolve their differences and bring a constructive proposal to the 1998 Legislature.

 

    Section 1 of this bill would amend the responsibilities of the Advisory Board.  While I agree with most of the proposed changes, one change is not appropriate.  That change is the requirement that the WSDA director consult the Advisory Board before hiring or dismissing supervisory personnel.  Personnel actions are the purview of agency managers who are legally responsible for the decisions they make, and who must defend any challenges to those decisions.  It is an unwarranted and inappropriate intrusion into agency operations for a citizen advisory board to have a statutory role in such decisions.

 

    For this reason, I have vetoed section 1 of Substitute House Bill 2089.

 

    With the exception of section 1, I am approving Substitute House Bill No. 2089."