CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6628

 

 

                   Chapter 199, Laws of 1998

 

                         (partial veto)

 

                        55th Legislature

                      1998 Regular Session

 

 

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING--COMPONENTS--STUDY OF WASHINGTON-BUILT LIGHT RAIL TRAIN SETS AND COMPONENTS

 

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  6/11/98

Passed by the Senate March 12, 1998

  YEAS 48   NAYS 1

 

 

 

               BRAD OWEN

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House March 11, 1998

  YEAS 77   NAYS 21

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Mike O=Connell, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is  ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6628 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

             CLYDE BALLARD

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

           MIKE O'CONNELL

                            Secretary

 

 

Approved March 27, 1998, with the exception of sections 2 and 3, which are vetoed.Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.  

                                FILED          

 

 

           March 27, 1998 - 3:41 p.m.

 

 

 

              GARY LOCKE

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

                    ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6628

          _______________________________________________

 

                      AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

 

             Passed Legislature - 1998 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      55th Legislature     1998 Regular Session

 

By Senators Benton, Finkbeiner, Anderson, Zarelli and Schow

 

Read first time 01/23/98.  Referred to Committee on Transportation.

Clarifying transportation planning.  


    AN ACT Relating to the state-owned facilities component of the state-wide transportation plan and intercity passenger rail; and amending RCW 47.06.040, 47.06.050, and 47.06.090; and adding a new chapter to 81.104 RCW.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 47.06.040 and 1994 c 258 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    The department shall develop a state-wide multimodal transportation plan under RCW 47.01.071(3) and in conformance with federal requirements, to ensure the continued mobility of people and goods within regions and across the state in a safe, cost-effective manner.  The state-wide multimodal transportation plan shall consist of:

    (1) A state-owned facilities component, which shall guide state investment for state highways including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and state ferries; and

    (2) A state-interest component, which shall define the state interest in aviation, marine ports and navigation, freight rail, intercity passenger rail, bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways, and public transportation, and recommend actions in coordination with appropriate public and private transportation providers to ensure that the state interest in these transportation modes is met.

    The plans developed under each component must be consistent with the state transportation policy plan and with each other, reflect public involvement, be consistent with regional transportation planning, high-capacity transportation planning, and local comprehensive plans prepared under chapter 36.70A RCW, and include analysis of intermodal connections and choices.  A primary emphasis for these plans shall be the relief of congestion, the preservation of existing investments, the improvement of traveler safety, the efficient movement of freight and goods, and the improvement and integration of all transportation modes to create a seamless intermodal transportation system for people and goods.

    In the development of the state-wide multimodal transportation plan, the department shall identify and document potential affected environmental resources, including, but not limited to, wetlands, storm water runoff, flooding, air quality, fish passage, and wildlife habitat.  The department shall conduct its environmental identification and documentation in coordination with all relevant environmental regulatory authorities, including, but not limited to, local governments.  The department shall give the relevant environmental regulatory authorities an opportunity to review the department's environmental plans.  The relevant environmental regulatory authorities shall provide comments on the department's environmental plans in a timely manner.  Environmental identification and documentation as provided for in RCW 47.01.300 and this section is not intended to create a private right of action or require an environmental impact statement as provided in chapter 43.21C RCW.

 

    *Sec. 2.  RCW 47.06.050 and 1993 c 446 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    The state-owned facilities component of the state-wide transportation plan shall identify the most cost-effective combination of highway, ferry, passenger rail, and high-capacity transportation improvements that maximizes the efficient movement of people, freight, and goods within state transportation corridors and will consist of:

    (1) The state highway system plan, which identifies program and financing needs and recommends specific and financially realistic improvements to preserve the structural integrity of the state highway system, ensure acceptable operating conditions, and provide for enhanced access to scenic, recreational, and cultural resources.  The state highway system plan shall contain the following elements:

    (a) A system preservation element, which shall establish structural preservation objectives for the state highway system including bridges, identify current and future structural deficiencies based upon analysis of current conditions and projected future deterioration, and recommend program funding levels and specific actions necessary to preserve the structural integrity of the state highway system consistent with adopted objectives.  This element shall serve as the basis for the preservation component of the six-year highway program and the two-year biennial budget request to the legislature;

    (b) A capacity and operational improvement element, which shall establish operational objectives, including safety considerations, for moving people and goods on the state highway system, identify current and future capacity, operational, and safety deficiencies, and recommend program funding levels and specific improvements and strategies necessary to achieve the operational objectives.  In developing capacity and operational improvement plans the department shall first assess strategies to enhance the operational efficiency of the existing system before recommending system expansion.  Congestion relief must be a primary emphasis of the capacity and operational improvement element.  Strategies to enhance the operational efficiencies include but are not limited to access management, transportation system management, demand management, and high-occupancy vehicle facilities.  The capacity and operational improvement element must conform to the state implementation plan for air quality and be consistent with regional transportation plans adopted under chapter 47.80 RCW, and shall serve as the basis for the capacity and operational improvement portions of the six-year highway program and the two-year biennial budget request to the legislature;

    (c) A scenic and recreational highways element, which shall identify and recommend designation of scenic and recreational highways, provide for enhanced access to scenic, recreational, and cultural resources associated with designated routes, and recommend a variety of management strategies to protect, preserve, and enhance these resources.  The department, affected counties, cities, and towns, regional transportation planning organizations, and other state or federal agencies shall jointly develop this element;

    (d) A paths and trails element, which shall identify the needs of nonmotorized transportation modes on the state transportation systems and provide the basis for the investment of state transportation funds in paths and trails, including funding provided under chapter 47.30 RCW.

    (2) The state ferry system plan, which shall guide capital and operating investments in the state ferry system.  The plan shall establish service objectives for state ferry routes, forecast travel demand for the various markets served in the system, and develop strategies for ferry system investment that consider regional and state-wide vehicle and passenger needs, support local land use plans, and assure that ferry services are fully integrated with other transportation services.  The plan shall assess the role of private ferries operating under the authority of the utilities and transportation commission and shall coordinate ferry system capital and operational plans with these private operations.  The ferry system plan must be consistent with the regional transportation plans for areas served by the state ferry system, and shall be developed in conjunction with the ferry advisory committees.

*Sec. 2 was vetoed.  See message at end of chapter.

 

    *Sec. 3.  RCW 47.06.090 and 1993 c 446 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

    The state-interest component of the state-wide multimodal transportation plan shall include an intercity passenger rail plan, which shall analyze existing intercity passenger rail service and recommend improvements to that service under the state passenger rail service program including depot improvements, potential service extensions, and ways to achieve higher train speeds.  The plan must include:

    (1) A service preservation element that outlines the trackage, depots, and train investments needed to maintain established service levels; and

    (2) A service improvement element that establishes service improvement objectives and outlines the trackage, depot, and train investments needed to meet improvement service objectives.

*Sec. 3 was vetoed.  See message at end of chapter.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 81.104 RCW to read as follows:

    Any regional transit authority imposing taxes under this chapter shall consult with the department of community, trade, and economic development to explore the potential for developing contracting methods and procedures that encourage the establishment of a manufacturing base in the state of Washington for the purpose of constructing and assembling commuter and light rail train sets and components.  The regional transit authority shall report its findings and recommendations to the legislative transportation committee by January 1, 1999.


    Passed the Senate March 12, 1998.

    Passed the House March 11, 1998.

Approved by the Governor March 27, 1998, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 27, 1998.


 

    Note:  Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

    "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to sections 2 and 3, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6628 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to the state-owned facilities component of the state-wide transportation plan and intercity passenger rail;"

 

    Section 2 of ESB 6628 would require an in-depth modal trade-off analysis.  Such an analysis is the type of research that we should ultimately seek in our state transportation plan.  However, section 2 calls for a cutting-edge type of analysis.  There is not sufficient research available to support that type of analysis at this time, and it is unrealistic to expect the Department of Transportation to accomplish such extensive work without any funding.

 

    Section 3 of ESB 6628 would add additional requirements to the intercity passenger rail plan.  While it would certainly be worthwhile for decision makers to have such information, the examination should be more modally comprehensive.  That is, similar data should be gleaned for all modes to allow a more fair comparison.  And again, without funding from the Legislature, the Department of Transportation cannot conduct such major work without being forced to neglect existing statutory requirements.

 

    For these reasons, I have vetoed sections 2 and 3 of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6628.

 

    With the exception of sections 2 and 3, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6628 is approved."