HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 SHB 2383

                  As Amended by the Senate

Title:  An act relating to aquatic nuisance species.

Brief Description:  Creating the aquatic nuisance species committee.

Sponsors:  By House Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Representatives Regala, G. Chandler, Anderson, Linville, Fisher, Scott, Kenney, Lovick, Haigh, Lantz, Wood, Santos, Edmonds and Ogden).

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Natural Resources:  1/21/00, 1/31/00 [DPS].

Floor Activity:

Passed House:  2/10/00, 97-0.

Senate Amended.

Passed Senate:  3/2/00, 46-0.

           Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

$Creates an Aquatic Nuisance Species Committee to coordinate efforts to prevent the introduction and spread of these species.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES

Majority Report:  The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 12 members:  Representatives Buck, Republican Co-Chair; Regala, Democratic Co-Chair; Anderson, Democratic Vice Chair; Sump, Republican Vice Chair; G. Chandler; Clements; Doumit; Eickmeyer; Ericksen; Pennington; Rockefeller and Stensen.

Staff:  Bill Lynch (786-7092).

Background:

The Zebra Mussel and European Green Crab Task Force, created by the Legislature during the 1998 session, recommended the creation of an aquatic nuisance species committee as its highest priority in its report to the Legislature.  The Legislature provided some funding in the 1999 operating budget for such a committee, but did not enact legislation establishing such a committee.

Summary of Bill:

An Aquatic Nuisance Species Committee is created to foster state, federal, tribal, and private cooperation on aquatic nuisance species issues.  The committee is directed to give special emphasis to preventing the introduction and spread of aquatic nuisance species.

Membership of the committee consists of representatives of the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health, Department of Natural Resources, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team, State Patrol, State Noxious Weed Control Board, and the Washington Sea Grant Program.  The committee is required to solicit participation by federally recognized Indian tribes, federal agencies, Washington conservation organizations, and representatives from industries that may either be affected by the introduction of an aquatic nuisance species or that may serve as a pathway for their introduction.

The committee has several responsibilities that it is directed to accomplish through the authority and cooperation of its member agencies.  These responsibilities include:  periodically revising the state aquatic nuisance species management plan; developing recommendations to the Legislature on statutory provisions for classifying and regulating aquatic nuisance species; recommending to the State Noxious Weed Control Board that a plant be classified as an aquatic noxious weed; coordinating education, research, regulatory authorities, and monitoring and control programs; participating in regional and national efforts regarding aquatic nuisance species; and consulting with representatives of different industries and activities that may serve as a pathway for introduction of these species, in order to develop strategies to minimize the risk of new introductions.

The committee must prepare a biennial report, listing its accomplishments and making recommendations for improvements for accomplishing its objectives, to the Legislature beginning December 1, 2001.

EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S): The amendment adds environmental groups to the list of groups from which the committee must solicit input.

Appropriation:  None.

Fiscal Note:  Requested on January 19, 2000.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  (Original bill)  There is a need to have a committee like this to make sure control efforts are coordinated, and to address regional concerns like the Columbia River.  Invasive species seriously impact our economy and have federal Endangered Species Act implications.

(In support with concerns)  The section regarding how a species is classified by the Fish and Wildlife Commission should be removed.  If wash stations for boats were installed at interstate road boundaries and boat launching ramps, nuisance species could be washed off before being introduced into state waters.

Testimony Against:  None.

Testified:  (In support) Scott Smith, Department of Fish and Wildlife; Harry Hutchins, Puget Sound Steamboat Operators Association; Ed Owens, Seafood Harvesters; Len Barson, Nature Conservancy; Bruce Wishert, People for Puget Sound; Mark Sytsma, Portland State University; Roy Schow, Recreational Boating Association; and Bernard Murray, Recreational Boating Association.

(In support with concerns)  Diane Cooper, Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers.