H-4277.1  _______________________________________________

 

                          HOUSE BILL 3057

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      56th Legislature     2000 Regular Session

 

By Representatives Koster and Schindler

 

Read first time 01/26/2000.  Referred to Committee on Local Government.

Equalizing setbacks adopted by local governments under the growth management act or the shoreline management act.


    AN ACT Relating to equalization of setbacks enacted by local governments under the authority of the growth management act or the shoreline management act; and amending RCW 90.58.100 and 36.70A.172.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 90.58.100 and 1997 c 369 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The master programs provided for in this chapter, when adopted or approved by the department shall constitute use regulations for the various shorelines of the state.  In preparing the master programs, and any amendments thereto, the department and local governments shall to the extent feasible:

    (a) Utilize a systematic interdisciplinary approach which will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts;

    (b) Consult with and obtain the comments of any federal, state, regional, or local agency having any special expertise with respect to any environmental impact;

    (c) Consider all plans, studies, surveys, inventories, and systems of classification made or being made by federal, state, regional, or local agencies, by private individuals, or by organizations dealing with pertinent shorelines of the state;

    (d) Conduct or support such further research, studies, surveys, and interviews as are deemed necessary;

    (e) Utilize all available information regarding hydrology, geography, topography, ecology, economics, and other pertinent data;

    (f) Employ, when feasible, all appropriate, modern scientific data processing and computer techniques to store, index, analyze, and manage the information gathered.

    (2) The master programs shall include, when appropriate, the following:

    (a) An economic development element for the location and design of industries, industrial projects of state-wide significance, transportation facilities, port facilities, tourist facilities, commerce and other developments that are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the state;

    (b) A public access element making provision for public access to publicly owned areas;

    (c) A recreational element for the preservation and enlargement of recreational opportunities, including but not limited to parks, tidelands, beaches, and recreational areas;

    (d) A circulation element consisting of the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the shoreline use element;

    (e) A use element which considers the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the use on shorelines and adjacent land areas for housing, business, industry, transportation, agriculture, natural resources, recreation, education, public buildings and grounds, and other categories of public and private uses of the land;

    (f) A conservation element for the preservation of natural resources, including but not limited to scenic vistas, aesthetics, and vital estuarine areas for fisheries and wildlife protection;

    (g) An historic, cultural, scientific, and educational element for the protection and restoration of buildings, sites, and areas having historic, cultural, scientific, or educational values;

    (h) An element that gives consideration to the state-wide interest in the prevention and minimization of flood damages; and

    (i) Any other element deemed appropriate or necessary to effectuate the policy of this chapter.

    (3) Any setback adopted by a city or county under the authority of this chapter shall be applied uniformly to all property within the city or county.  No exceptions to any setback ordinance or regulation adopted by a city or county may be allowed, including but not limited to exceptions for development or redevelopment in urban areas or other areas of more intensive development.

    (4) The master programs shall include such map or maps, descriptive text, diagrams and charts, or other descriptive material as are necessary to provide for ease of understanding.

    (((4))) (5) Master programs will reflect that state-owned shorelines of the state are particularly adapted to providing wilderness beaches, ecological study areas, and other recreational activities for the public and will give appropriate special consideration to same.

    (((5))) (6) Each master program shall contain provisions to allow for the varying of the application of use regulations of the program, including provisions for permits for conditional uses and variances, to insure that strict implementation of a program will not create unnecessary hardships or thwart the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020.  Any such varying shall be allowed only if extraordinary circumstances are shown and the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect.  The concept of this subsection shall be incorporated in the rules adopted by the department relating to the establishment of a permit system as provided in RCW 90.58.140(3).

    (((6))) (7) Each master program shall contain standards governing the protection of single family residences and appurtenant structures against damage or loss due to shoreline erosion.  The standards shall govern the issuance of substantial development permits for shoreline protection, including structural methods such as construction of bulkheads, and nonstructural methods of protection.  The standards shall provide for methods which achieve effective and timely protection against loss or damage to single family residences and appurtenant structures due to shoreline erosion.  The standards shall provide a preference for permit issuance for measures to protect single family residences occupied prior to January 1, 1992, where the proposed measure is designed to minimize harm to the shoreline natural environment.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 36.70A.172 and 1995 c 347 s 105 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, counties and cities shall include the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas.  In addition, counties and cities shall give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries.

    (2) If it determines that advice from scientific or other experts is necessary or will be of substantial assistance in reaching its decision, a growth management hearings board may retain scientific or other expert advice to assist in reviewing a petition under RCW 36.70A.290 that involves critical areas.

    (3) In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, any setback adopted by a city or county under the authority of this chapter shall be applied uniformly to all property within the city or county.  No exceptions to any setback ordinance or regulation adopted by a city or county may be allowed, including but not limited to exceptions for development or redevelopment in urban areas or other areas of more intensive development.

 


                            --- END ---