S-1131.2  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 5916

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      56th Legislature     1999 Regular Session

 

By Senators Jacobsen and Oke

 

Read first time 02/16/1999.  Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Parks & Recreation.

Criminalizing the possession or sale of substances that contain rhinoceros or tiger parts.


    AN ACT Relating to wildlife and wildlife parts; amending RCW 77.15.070; adding new sections to chapter 77.15 RCW; creating a new section; and prescribing penalties.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:

    (1) Growing demand throughout the world for wildlife and wildlife parts and products has created a market in which commercial exploitation has threatened the survival of many foreign endangered species, such as certain rhinoceros and tiger populations.

    (2) There are insufficient legal mechanisms enabling the federal wildlife enforcement agencies to forcefully interdict products that are labeled as containing substances derived from foreign endangered species and prosecute the merchandisers for sale or display of those products.

    (3) Although approximately seventy-seven thousand import and export shipments occur annually in the United States, the United States fish and wildlife service is able to maintain only ninety-two wildlife inspectors at thirty ports of entry, including thirteen designated ports, to monitor the shipments.

    (4) Wildlife inspectors are able to physically inspect only an estimated five to ten percent of all import and export shipments, making the rate of detection of contraband wildlife products extremely low.

    (5) Alternatives are available to the traditional medicinal products that contain substances derived from foreign endangered and other species.

    (6) State laws prohibiting the trafficking of protected animal parts or products should be strengthened to include foreign endangered species.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  No person may engage in trafficking of any product, item, or a substance intended for human consumption containing or purporting to contain any substance derived from any species listed in 50 C.F.R. Sec. 23.23 as that section existed on the effective date of this section.  For the purposes of this section, "trafficking" means attempting to engage or engaging in any form of commercial exchange including but not limited to sale, barter, or purchase.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A person who knowingly violates section 2 of this act is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  Any person who knowingly violates section 2 of this act may be assessed a civil penalty by the director of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars for each violation.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 77.15.070 and 1998 c 190 s 69 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Fish and wildlife officers and ex officio fish and wildlife officers may seize without warrant boats, airplanes, vehicles, gear, appliances, or other articles they have probable cause to believe have been used in violation of this chapter.  However, fish and wildlife officers may not seize any item or article, other than for evidence, if under the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that the violation was inadvertent.  The property seized is subject to forfeiture to the state under this section regardless of ownership.  Property seized may be recovered by its owner by depositing into court a cash bond equal to the value of the seized property but not more than twenty‑five thousand dollars.  Such cash bond is subject to forfeiture in lieu of the property.  Forfeiture of property seized under this section is a civil forfeiture against property intended to be a remedial civil sanction.

    (2) In the event of a seizure of property under this section, jurisdiction to begin the forfeiture proceedings shall commence upon seizure.  Within fifteen days following the seizure, the seizing authority shall serve a written notice of intent to forfeit property on the owner of the property seized and on any person having any known right or interest in the property seized.  Notice may be served by any method authorized by law or court rule, including service by certified mail with return receipt requested.  Service by mail is deemed complete upon mailing within the fifteen‑day period following the seizure.

    (3) Persons claiming a right of ownership or right to possession of property are entitled to a hearing to contest forfeiture.  Such a claim shall specify the claim of ownership or possession and shall be made in writing and served on the director within forty‑five days of the seizure.  If the seizing authority has complied with notice requirements and there is no claim made within forty-five days, then the property shall be forfeited to the state.

    (4) If any person timely serves the director with a claim to property, the person shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard as to the person's claim or right.  The hearing shall be before the director or director's designee, or before an administrative law judge appointed under chapter 34.12 RCW, except that a person asserting a claim or right may remove the matter to a court of competent jurisdiction if the aggregate value of the property seized is more than five thousand dollars.

    (5) The hearing to contest forfeiture and any subsequent appeal shall be as provided for in Title 34 RCW.  The seizing authority has the burden to demonstrate that it had reason to believe the property was held with intent to violate or was used in violation of this title or rule of the commission or director.  The person contesting forfeiture has the burden of production and proof by a preponderance of evidence that the person owns or has a right to possess the property and:

    (a) That the property was not held with intent to violate or used in violation of this title or Title 75 RCW; or

    (b) If the property is a boat, airplane, or vehicle, that the illegal use or planned illegal use of the boat, airplane, or vehicle occurred without the owner's knowledge or consent, and that the owner acted reasonably to prevent illegal uses of such boat, airplane, or vehicle.

    (6) A forfeiture of a conveyance encumbered by a perfected security interest is subject to the interest of the secured party if the secured party neither had knowledge (([of])) of nor consented to the act or omission.  No security interest in seized property may be perfected after seizure.

    (7) If seized property is forfeited under this section the department may retain it for official use unless the property is required to be destroyed, or upon application by any law enforcement agency of the state, release such property to the agency for the use of enforcing this title, or sell such property, and deposit the proceeds to the wildlife fund, as provided for in RCW 77.12.170.

    (8) Any product, item, or substance sold or attempted to be sold, contrary to the provisions of section 2 of this act shall be subject to forfeiture to the state.  All equipment, vessels, vehicles, aircraft, and other means of transportation used to aid the selling, or an attempt to sell any product, item, or substance in violation of section 2 of this act shall be subject to forfeiture to the state upon conviction of a criminal violation under section 3 of this act.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  Sections 2 through 4 of this act are each added to chapter 77.15 RCW.

 


                            --- END ---