Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

 ANALYSIS

Judiciary Committee

 

 

HB 2071

 

Title:  An act relating to post judgment interest on tort judgments.

 

Brief Description:  Revising the rate of interest on certain tort judgments.

 

Sponsors:  Representatives Alexander, Sommers, Carrell and Doumit.

 

Brief Summary of Bill

$Changes the interest rate on judgments to two points above the treasury bill rate, from the current rate which is the higher of 12 percent or four points above the 26‑week treasury bill rate.

 

 

Hearing Date:  2/14/02

 

Staff:  Bill Perry (786‑7123).

 

Background:

 

Interest accrues on a tort judgment from the date of entry of the judgement at a rate determined as prescribed in statute.  That rate is set at the maximum rate allowed under the state's general usury law.  It is the higher of the two following rates:

 

$12 percent; or

$4 points above the 26-week treasury bill rate established by the federal reserve board.

 

This method of determining the rate was enacted in 1983 and applies to tort judgments against defendants who are government entities or private entities.  Prior to 1983, the interest rate on judgments against private party defendants was 12 percent, and on judgments against the state it was 8 percent.

 

In 1983, the 26‑week T‑bill rate averaged 8.75 percent.  Adding 4 percent to this amount made the two alternative methods of computing the interest rate for judgments roughly equivalent.   However, since 1991, the T‑bill rate has been as low as 3.14 percent, and has been no higher than 5.59 percent.  In 2000, the rate averaged a little under 6 percent.  As a result, 12 percent has been the interest rate on judgments for the past decade or more.

 

In 1983, the legislation that created the current method of determining the interest rate on judgments expressly made the change apply only to judgments entered after the effective date of the change.  (Section 3, Chapter 147, Laws of 1983.)  There is case law suggesting that if legislation is silent on the issue, the courts may go either way on the question of whether the new rate will be applied to existing unpaid judgments, as well.  Whatever the outcome may be if the Legislature is silent on the subject, it does appear that the Legislature may make an interest rate change apply to existing judgments if it chooses to do so expressly.  The courts of this state have said that interest on a judgment is not a matter of contractual right, but rather a matter of legislative discretion.  (Puget Sound Bank v. St. Paul Fire Ins.,  32 Wn. App. 32 (1982), review denied, 97 Wn 2d 1036 (1982), citing Palmer v. Laberee, 23 Wash 409 (1900).)

 

Summary of Bill:

 

The interest rate on tort judgments is to be determined by adding two points to the 26-week treasury bill rate.

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Requested on February 14, 2002.

 

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.