_______________________________________________

 

               ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1832

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Linville and G. Chandler; by request of Governor Locke)

 

Read first time .  Referred to Committee on .

Modifying provisions concerning water management. 


    AN ACT Relating to water resources management; amending RCW 90.82.040, 90.82.130, 90.03.380, 90.80.005, 90.80.010, 90.80.050, 90.80.070, 90.80.080, 90.80.090, 90.80.100, 90.80.120, 90.80.130, 90.80.140, 90.80.150, 90.66.040, 90.66.060, 90.14.140, 90.38.020, 90.38.040, 90.42.040, and 90.42.080; adding a new section to chapter 90.82 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 90.80 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.66 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82.16 RCW; creating new sections; prescribing penalties; providing an expiration date; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature is committed to meeting the needs of a growing population and a healthy economy statewide; to meeting the needs of fish and healthy watersheds statewide; and to advancing these two principles together, in increments over time.

    The legislature finds that improved management of the state's water resources, clarifying the authorities, requirements, and timelines for establishing instream flows, providing timely decisions on water transfers, clarifying the authority of water conservancy boards, and enhancing the flexibility of our water management system to meet both environmental and economic goals are important steps to providing a better future for our state.

    The need for these improvements is particularly urgent as we are faced with drought conditions.  The failure to act now will only increase the potential negative effects on both the economy and the environment, including fisheries resources.

    Deliberative action over several legislative sessions and interim periods between sessions will be required to address the long-term goal of improving the responsiveness of the state water code to meet the diverse water needs of the state's citizenry.  It is the intent of the legislature to begin this work now by providing tools to enable the state to respond to imminent drought conditions and other immediate problems relating to water resources management.  It is also the legislature's intent to lay the groundwork for future legislation for addressing the state's long-term water problems.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 90.82.040 and 1998 c 247 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Once a WRIA planning unit has been initiated under RCW 90.82.060 and a lead agency has been designated, it shall notify the department and may apply to the department for funding assistance for conducting the planning.  Funds shall be provided from and to the extent of appropriations made by the legislature to the department expressly for this purpose.

    (2)(a) Each planning unit that has complied with subsection (1) of this section is eligible to receive watershed planning grants in the following amounts for three phases of watershed planning:

    (((a))) (i) Initiating governments may apply for an initial organizing grant of up to fifty thousand dollars for a single WRIA or up to seventy-five thousand dollars for a multi-WRIA management area in accordance with RCW 90.82.060(4);

    (((b))) (ii)(A) A planning unit may apply for up to two hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA in the management area for conducting watershed assessments in accordance with RCW 90.82.070, except that a planning unit that chooses to conduct a detailed assessment or studies under (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection or whose initiating governments choose or have chosen to include an instream flow or water quality component in accordance with RCW 90.82.080 or 90.82.090 may apply for up to one hundred thousand additional dollars for each instream flow and up to one hundred thousand additional dollars for each water quality component included for each WRIA to conduct an assessment on that optional component and for each WRIA in which the assessments or studies under (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection are conducted.

    (B) A planning unit may elect to apply for up to one hundred thousand additional dollars to conduct a detailed assessment of multipurpose water storage opportunities or for studies of specific multipurpose storage projects which opportunities or projects are consistent with and support the other elements of the planning unit's watershed plan developed under this chapter; and

    (((c))) (iii) A planning unit may apply for up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA in the management area for developing a watershed plan and making recommendations for actions by local, state, and federal agencies, tribes, private property owners, private organizations, and individual citizens, including a recommended list of strategies and projects that would further the purpose of the plan in accordance with RCW 90.82.060 through 90.82.100.

    (b) A planning unit may request a different amount for phase two or phase three of watershed planning than is specified in (a) of this subsection, provided that the total amount of funds awarded do not exceed the maximum amount the planning unit is eligible for under (a) of this subsection.  The department shall approve such an alternative allocation of funds if the planning unit identifies how the proposed alternative will meet the goals of this chapter and provides a proposed timeline for the completion of planning.  However, the up to one hundred thousand additional dollars in funding for instream flow and water quality components and for water storage assessments or studies that a planning unit may apply for under (a)(ii)(A) of this subsection may be used only for those instream flow, water quality, and water storage purposes.

    (c) By December 1, 2001, or within one year of initiating phase one of watershed planning, whichever occurs later, the initiating governments for each planning unit must inform the department whether they intend to have the planning unit establish or amend instream flows as part of its planning process.  If they elect to have the planning unit establish or amend instream flows, the planning unit is eligible to receive one hundred thousand dollars for that purpose in accordance with (a)(ii) of this subsection.  If the initiating governments for a planning unit elect not to establish or amend instream flows as part of the unit's planning process, the department shall retain one hundred thousand dollars to carry out an assessment to support establishment of instream flows and to establish such flows in accordance with RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) and chapter 90.22 RCW.  The department shall not use these funds to amend an existing instream flow unless requested to do so by the initiating governments for a planning unit.

    (d) In administering funds appropriated for supplemental funding for optional plan components under (a)(ii) of this subsection, the department shall give priority in granting the available funds to proposals for setting or amending instream flows.

    (3)(a) The department shall use the eligibility criteria in this subsection (3) instead of rules, policies, or guidelines when evaluating grant applications at each stage of the grants program.

    (b) In reviewing grant applications under this subsection (3), the department shall evaluate whether:

    (i) The planning unit meets all of the requirements of this chapter;

    (ii) The application demonstrates a need for state planning funds to accomplish the objectives of the planning process; and

    (iii) The application and supporting information evidences a readiness to proceed.

    (c) In ranking grant applications submitted at each stage of the grants program, the department shall give preference to applications in the following order of priority:

    (i) Applications from existing planning groups that have been in existence for at least one year;

    (ii) Applications that address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic fish species listed or proposed to be listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth from:

    (A) First, multi-WRIA planning; and

    (B) Second, single WRIA planning;

    (iii) Applications that address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds or for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth from:

    (A) First, multi-WRIA planning; and

    (B) Second, single WRIA planning.

    (d) The department may not impose any local matching fund requirement as a condition for grant eligibility or as a preference for receiving a grant.

    (4) The department may retain up to one percent of funds allocated under this section to defray administrative costs.

    (5) Planning under this chapter should be completed as expeditiously as possible, with the focus being on local stakeholders cooperating to meet local needs.

    (6) Funding provided under this section shall be considered a contractual obligation against the moneys appropriated for this purpose.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 90.82 RCW to read as follows:

    By October 1, 2001, the department of ecology shall complete a final nonproject environmental impact statement that evaluates stream flows to meet the alternative goals of maintaining, preserving, or enhancing instream resources and the technically defensible methodologies for determining these stream flows.  Planning units and state agencies assessing and setting or amending instream flows must, as a minimum, consider the goals and methodologies addressed in the nonproject environmental impact statement.  A planning unit or state agency may assess, set, or amend instream flows in a manner that varies from the final nonproject environmental impact statement if consistent with applicable instream flow laws.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 90.82.130 and 1998 c 247 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1)(a) Upon completing its proposed watershed plan, the planning unit may approve the proposal by consensus of all of the members of the planning unit or by consensus among the members of the planning unit appointed to represent units of government and a majority vote of the nongovernmental members of the planning unit.

    (b) If the proposal is approved by the planning unit, the unit shall submit the proposal to the counties with territory within the management area.  If the planning unit has received funding beyond the initial ((fifty thousand dollars)) organizing grant under RCW 90.82.040, such a proposal approved by the planning unit shall be submitted to the counties within four years of the date ((the)) that funds beyond the initial funding ((was)) are first ((received)) drawn upon by the planning unit.

    (c) If the watershed plan is not approved by the planning unit, the planning unit may submit the components of the plan for which agreement is achieved using the procedure under (a) of this subsection, or the planning unit may terminate the planning process.

    (2)(a) The legislative authority of each of the counties with territory in the management area shall provide public notice of and conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed watershed plan submitted under this section.  After the public hearings, the legislative authorities of these counties shall convene in joint session to consider the proposal.  The counties may approve or reject the proposed watershed plan for the management area, but may not amend it.  Approval of such a proposal shall be made by a majority vote of the members of each of the counties with territory in the management area.

    (b) If a proposed watershed plan is not approved, it shall be returned to the planning unit with recommendations for revisions.  Approval of such a revised proposal by the planning unit and the counties shall be made in the same manner provided for the original watershed plan.  If approval of the revised plan is not achieved, the process shall terminate.

    (3) The planning unit shall not add an element to its watershed plan that creates an obligation unless each of the governments to be obligated has at least one representative on the planning unit and the respective members appointed to represent those governments agree to adding the element that creates the obligation.  A member's agreeing to add an element shall be evidenced by a recorded vote of all members of the planning unit in which the members record support for adding the element.  If the watershed plan is approved under subsections (1) and (2) of this section and the plan creates obligations:  (a) For agencies of state government, the agencies shall adopt by rule the obligations of both state and county governments and rules implementing the state obligations, the obligations on state agencies are binding upon adoption of the obligations into rule, and the agencies shall take other actions to fulfill their obligations as soon as possible; or (b) for counties, the obligations are binding on the counties and the counties shall adopt any necessary implementing ordinances and take other actions to fulfill their obligations as soon as possible.

    (4) As used in this section, "obligation" means any action required as a result of this chapter that imposes upon a tribal government, county government, or state government, either:  A fiscal impact; a redeployment of resources; or a change of existing policy.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 90.03.380 and 1997 c 442 s 801 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The right to the use of water which has been applied to a beneficial use in the state shall be and remain appurtenant to the land or place upon which the same is used:  PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the right may be transferred to another or to others and become appurtenant to any other land or place of use without loss of priority of right theretofore established if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.  The point of diversion of water for beneficial use or the purpose of use may be changed, if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.  A change in the place of use, point of diversion, and/or purpose of use of a water right to enable irrigation of additional acreage or the addition of new uses may be permitted if such change results in no increase in the annual consumptive quantity of water used under the water right.  For purposes of this section, "annual consumptive quantity" means the estimated or actual annual amount of water diverted pursuant to the water right, reduced by the estimated annual amount of return flows, averaged over the two years of greatest use within the most recent five-year period of continuous beneficial use of the water right.  Before any transfer of such right to use water or change of the point of diversion of water or change of purpose of use can be made, any person having an interest in the transfer or change, shall file a written application therefor with the department, and the application shall not be granted until notice of the application is published as provided in RCW 90.03.280.  If it shall appear that such transfer or such change may be made without injury or detriment to existing rights, the department shall issue to the applicant a certificate in duplicate granting the right for such transfer or for such change of point of diversion or of use.  The certificate so issued shall be filed and be made a record with the department and the duplicate certificate issued to the applicant may be filed with the county auditor in like manner and with the same effect as provided in the original certificate or permit to divert water.

    (2) If an application for change proposes to transfer water rights from one irrigation district to another, the department shall, before publication of notice, receive concurrence from each of the irrigation districts that such transfer or change will not adversely affect the ability to deliver water to other landowners or impair the financial integrity of either of the districts.

    (3) A change in place of use by an individual water user or users of water provided by an irrigation district need only receive approval for the change from the board of directors of the district if the use of water continues within the irrigation district, and when water is provided by an irrigation entity that is a member of a board of joint control created under chapter 87.80 RCW, approval need only be received from the board of joint control if the use of water continues within the area of jurisdiction of the joint board and the change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.

    (4) This section shall not apply to trust water rights acquired by the state through the funding of water conservation projects under chapter 90.38 RCW or RCW 90.42.010 through 90.42.070.

    (5)(a) Pending applications for new water rights are not entitled to protection from impairment, injury, or detriment when an application relating to an existing surface or ground water right is considered.

    (b) Applications relating to existing surface or ground water rights may be processed and decisions on them rendered independently of processing and rendering decisions on pending applications for new water rights within the same source of supply without regard to the date of filing of the pending applications for new water rights.

    (c) Notwithstanding any other existing authority to process applications, including but not limited to the authority to process applications under WAC 173-152-050 as it existed on January 1, 2001, an application relating to an existing surface or ground water right may be processed ahead of a previously filed application relating to an existing right when sufficient information for a decision on the previously filed application is not available and the applicant for the previously filed application is sent written notice that explains what information is not available and informs the applicant that processing of the next application will begin.  The previously filed application does not lose its priority date and if the information is provided by the applicant within sixty days, the previously filed application shall be processed at that time.  This subsection (5)(c) does not affect any other existing authority to process applications.

    (d) Nothing in this subsection (5) is intended to stop the processing of applications for new water rights.

    (6) No applicant for a change, transfer, or amendment of a water right may be required to give up any part of the applicant's valid water right or claim to a state agency, the trust water rights program, or to other persons as a condition of processing the application.

    (7) In revising the provisions of this section and adding provisions to this section by this act, the legislature does not intend to imply legislative approval or disapproval of any existing administrative policy regarding, or any existing administrative or judicial interpretation of, the provisions of this section not expressly added or revised.

 

    Sec. 6.  RCW 90.80.005 and 1997 c 441 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    The legislature finds:

    (1) Voluntary water right transfers ((between water users)) can reallocate water use in a manner that will result in more efficient use of water resources;

    (2) Voluntary water right transfers can help alleviate water shortages, save capital outlays, reduce development costs, and provide an incentive for investment in water conservation efforts by water right holders; and

    (3) The state should expedite the administrative process for ((noncontested)) water right transfers ((among water right holders, conveying greater operational control to water managers and water right holders)) by authorizing the establishment of water conservancy boards.

 

    Sec. 7.  RCW 90.80.010 and 1997 c 441 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    The following definitions apply throughout this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

    (1) "Board" means a water conservancy board created under this chapter.

    (2) "Commissioner" means a member of a water conservancy board.

    (3) "Department" means the department of ecology.

    (4) "Director" means the director of the department of ecology.

    (5) "Record of decision" means the conclusion reached by a water conservancy board regarding an application for a transfer filed with the board.

    (6) "Transfer" means a transfer, change, amendment, or other alteration of a part or all of a water right authorized under RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.  A new section is added to chapter 90.80 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) If a county is the only county having lands comprising a water resource inventory area as defined in chapter 173-500 WAC, the county may elect to establish a water conservancy board for the water resource inventory area, rather than for the entire county.

    (2) Counties having lands within a water resource inventory area may jointly petition the department for establishment of a water conservancy board for the water resource inventory area.  Counties may jointly petition the department to establish boards serving multiple counties or one or more water resource inventory areas.  For any of these multicounty options, the counties must reach their joint determination on the decision to file the  petition, on the proposed bylaws, and on other matters relating to the establishment and operation of the board in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and chapter 39.34 RCW, the interlocal cooperation act.  Each county must meet the requirements of RCW 90.80.020(2).  The counties must jointly determine the sufficiency of a petition under RCW 90.80.020(3) and each county legislative authority must hold a hearing in its county.

    (3) If establishment of a multicounty water conservancy board under any of the options provided in subsection (2) of this section is approved by the department, the counties must jointly appoint the board commissioners and jointly appoint members to fill vacancies as they occur in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and chapter 39.34 RCW.

    (4) A board established for more than one county or for one or more water resource inventory areas has the same powers as other boards established under this chapter.  The board has no jurisdiction outside the boundaries of the water resource inventory area or areas or the county or counties, as applicable, for which it has been established, except as provided in this chapter.

    (5) The counties establishing a board for a multiple county area must designate a lead county for purposes of providing a single point of contact for communications with the department.  The lead county shall forward the information required in RCW 90.80.030(1) for each county.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.  A new section is added to chapter 90.80 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a board shall operate on a countywide basis or on an areawide basis in the case of a board with jurisdiction in more than one county or water resource inventory area, and have the following powers, in addition to any other powers granted in this chapter:

    (a) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a board may act upon applications for the same kinds of transfers that the department itself is authorized to act upon, including an application to establish a trust water right under chapter 90.38 or 90.42 RCW.  A board may not act upon an application for the type of transfer within an irrigation district as described in RCW 90.03.380(3).  If a board receives an application for a transfer between two irrigation districts as described in RCW 90.03.380(2), the board must, before publication of notice of the application, receive the concurrence specified in that section.

    (b) A board may act upon an application to transfer a water right claim filed under chapter 90.14 RCW.  In acting upon such an application, the board must make a tentative determination as to the validity and extent of the right, if any, embodied in the claim and may only issue a record of decision regarding a transfer of such a claim to the extent it is tentatively determined to be valid.  Neither the board's tentative determination, nor the director's acceptance of such a tentative determination, constitutes an adjudication of the right under RCW 90.03.110 through 90.03.240 or 90.44.220, and such a determination does not preclude or prejudice a subsequent challenge to the validity, priority, or quantity of the right in a general adjudication under those sections.

    (c) A board may establish a water right transfer information exchange through which all or part of a water right may be listed for sale or lease.  The board may also accept and post notices in the exchange from persons interested in acquiring or leasing water rights from willing sellers.

    (d) The director shall assign a representative of the department to provide technical assistance to each board.  If requested by the board, the representative shall work with the board as it reviews applications for formal acceptance, prepares draft records of decision, and considers other technical or legal factors affecting the board's development of a final record of decision.  A board may request and accept additional technical assistance from the department.  A board may also request and accept assistance and support from the county government or governments of the county or counties in which it operates.

    (2) The jurisdiction of a board shall not apply within the boundaries of a federal Indian reservation or to lands held in trust for an Indian band, tribe, or nation by the federal government.

 

    Sec. 10.  RCW 90.80.050 and 1997 c 441 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) A water conservancy board constitutes a public body corporate and politic and a separate unit of local government in the state.  Each board shall consist of three commissioners appointed by the county legislative authority or authorities as applicable for six-year terms.  The county legislative authority or authorities shall stagger the initial appointment of commissioners so that the first commissioners who are appointed shall serve terms of two, four, and six years, respectively, from the date of their appointment.  The county legislative authority or authorities may appoint two additional commissioners, for a total of five.  If the county or counties elect to appoint five commissioners, the initial terms of the additional commissioners shall be for three and five-year terms respectively.  All vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term.

    (2) The county legislative authority or authorities shall consider, but ((is)) are not limited in appointing, nominations to the board by people or entities petitioning or requesting the creation of the board.  ((However,)) The county legislative authority or authorities shall ensure that at least one commissioner is an individual water right holder((s)) who diverts or withdraws water for use within the ((county are represented on)) area served by the board.  The county legislative authority or authorities must appoint one person who is not a water right holder.  If the county legislative authority or authorities choose not to appoint five commissioners, and as of the effective date of this section there is no commissioner on an existing board who is not a water right holder, the county or counties are not required to appoint a new commissioner until the first vacancy occurs.  In making appointments to the board, the county legislative authority or authorities shall choose from among persons who are residents of the county or counties or a county that is contiguous to the county that the water conservancy board is to serve.

    (3) No commissioner may participate in a record of decision of a board ((decisions)) until he or she has successfully completed the necessary training required under RCW 90.80.040.  Commissioners shall serve without compensation, but are entitled to reimbursement for necessary travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060 and costs incident to receiving training.

 

    Sec. 11.  RCW 90.80.070 and 1997 c 441 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) A person proposing a transfer of a water right may elect to file an application with a water conservancy board, if a board has been established for the geographic area where the water is or would be diverted, withdrawn, or used.  If the person has already filed an application with the department, the person may request that the department convey the application to the conservancy board with jurisdiction and the department must promptly forward the application.  A board is not required to process an application filed with the board.  If a board decides that it will not process an application, it must return the application to the applicant and must inform the applicant that the application may be filed with the department.  An application((s)) to the board for a transfer((s)) shall be made on a form provided by the department((, and shall contain such)).  A board may require an applicant to submit within a reasonable time additional information as may be required by the board in order to review and act upon the application.  At a minimum, the application shall include information sufficient to establish to the board's satisfaction ((of the transferor's)) that a right to the quantity of water being transferred exists, and a description of any applicable limitations on the right to use water, including the point of diversion or withdrawal, place of use, source of supply, purpose of use, quantity of use permitted, time of use, period of use, and the place of storage.

    (2) The ((transferor and the transferee of)) applicant for any proposed water right transfer may apply to a board for ((approval of the)) a record of decision on a transfer if the water proposed to be transferred is currently diverted, withdrawn, or used within the geographic ((boundaries of the county)) area in which the board has jurisdiction, or would be diverted, withdrawn, or used within the geographic ((boundaries of the county)) area in which the board has jurisdiction if the transfer is approved.  In the case of a proposed water right transfer in which the water is currently diverted or withdrawn or would be diverted or withdrawn outside the geographic boundaries of the county or the water resource inventory area where the use is proposed to be made, the board shall hold a public hearing in the county of the diversion or withdrawal or proposed diversion or withdrawal.  The board shall provide for prominent publication of notice of ((such)) the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county in which the hearing is to be held for the purpose of affording an opportunity for interested persons to comment upon the application.  If an application is for a transfer of water out of the water resource inventory area that is the source of the water, the board shall consult with the department regarding the application.

    (3) After an application for a transfer is filed with the board, the board shall publish notice of the application ((in accordance with the publication requirements)) and send notice to state agencies ((as provided in)) in accordance with the requirements of RCW 90.03.280.  In addition, the board shall send notice of the application to any Indian tribe with reservation lands that would be, but for section 9(2) of this act, within the area in which the board has jurisdiction.  The board shall also provide notice of the application to any Indian tribe that has requested that it be notified of applications.  Any person may submit comments and other information to the board regarding the application.  ((Any water right holder claiming detriment or injury to an existing water right may intervene in the application before the board pursuant to subsection (4) of this section.  If a majority of the board determines that the application is complete, in accordance with the law and the transfer can be made without injury or detriment to existing water rights in accordance with RCW 90.03.380, the board shall issue the applicant a certificate conditionally approving the transfer, subject to review by the director.

    (4) If a water right holder claims a proposed transfer will cause an impairment to that right, the water right holder is entitled to a hearing before the board.  The board shall receive such evidence as it deems material and necessary to determine the validity of the claim of impairment.  If the party claiming the impairment establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that his or her water right will be impaired by the proposed transfer, the board may not approve the transfer unless the applicant and the impaired party agree upon compensation for the impairment.))  The comments and information may be submitted in writing or verbally at any public meeting of the board to discuss or decide on the application.  The comments must be considered by the board in making its record of decision.

    (4) If a majority of the board determines that the application is complete, and that the transfer is in accordance with RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100, the board must issue a record of decision approving the transfer, subject to review by the director.  In making its record of decision, the board must consider among other things whether the proposed transfer can be made without detriment or injury to existing water rights, including rights established for instream flows.  The board must include in its record of decision any conditions that are deemed necessary for the transfer to qualify for approval under the applicable laws of the state.  The basis for the record of decision of the board must be documented in a report of examination.  The board's proposed approval must clearly state that the applicant is not permitted to proceed to effect the proposed transfer until a final decision is made by the director.  In making its record of decision, the board must consider among other things whether the proposed transfer can be made without detriment or injury to existing water rights, including rights established for instream flows.

    (5) If a majority of the board determines that the application cannot be approved under the applicable laws of the state of Washington, the board must make a record of decision denying the application together with its report of examination documenting its record of decision.  The board's record of decision is subject to review by the director under RCW 90.80.080.

 

    Sec. 12.  RCW 90.80.080 and 1997 c 441 s 11 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) ((If a transfer is approved by the board,)) The board must provide a copy of its record of decision to the applicant.  The board shall submit ((a copy of the proposed certificate conditionally approving)) its record of decision on the transfer application to the department for review.  The board shall also submit ((a)) its report of examination to the department summarizing ((any)) factual findings on which the board relied in ((deciding to approve the proposed transfer)) reaching its record of decision and a copy of the files and records upon which the board's record of decision is based.  The board shall also promptly transmit notice by mail to any person who objected to the transfer or who requested notice of the board's record of decision.

    (2) Upon receipt of a board's record of decision, the department shall promptly post the text of the record of decision transmittal form on the department's internet site.  The director shall review each ((proposed transfer conditionally approved)) record of decision made by a board for compliance with applicable state water ((transfer laws including RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, and 90.44.100, rules and guidelines adopted by the department, and other applicable)) law.

    (3) Any party to a transfer ((or a)), third party who alleges his or her water right will be impaired by the proposed transfer, or other person may file ((objections)) a letter of concern or support with the department and the department may consider the concern or support expressed in the letter.  ((If objections to the transfer are filed with the department, the board shall forward the files and records upon which it based its decision to the department.))  Such letters must be received by the department within thirty days of the department's receipt of the board's record of decision.

    (4) The director shall review the ((action)) record of decision of the board and shall affirm, reverse, or modify the action of the board within forty-five days of receipt.   The forty-five day time period may be extended for an additional thirty days by the director((, upon the consent of the parties to the transfer)) or at the request of the board or applicant.  If the director fails to act within ((this)) the prescribed time period, the board's ((action is final.  Upon approval of a water transfer by the action or nonaction of the director, the conditional certificate issued by the board is final and valid)) record of decision becomes the decision of the department and is appealable as provided by RCW 90.80.090.  If the director acts within the prescribed time period, the director's decision to affirm, modify, or reverse is appealable as provided by RCW 90.80.090, and the director's decision to remand is appealable as provided by RCW 90.80.120(2)(b).

 

    Sec. 13.  RCW 90.80.090 and 1997 c 441 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:

    The decision of the director to approve or deny an action to create a board, or to approve, deny, or modify a water right transfer either by action or ((nonaction shall be)) inaction is appealable in the same manner as other water right decisions made pursuant to chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW.

 

    Sec. 14.  RCW 90.80.100 and 1997 c 441 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

    Neither the county ((nor)) or counties, the department, a conservancy board, or its employees, nor individual conservancy board commissioners shall be subject to any cause of action or claim for damages arising out of records of decisions on transfers ((approved)) made by a board under this chapter.

 

    Sec. 15.  RCW 90.80.120 and 1997 c 441 s 16 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) A commissioner of a water conservancy board ((who has an ownership interest in a water right subject to an application for approval of a transfer or change by the board, shall not participate in the board's review or decision upon the application)) shall not engage in any act which is in conflict with the proper discharge of the official duties of a commissioner.  A commissioner is deemed to have a conflict of interest if he or she:

    (a) Has an ownership interest in a water right subject to an application for approval before the board;

    (b) Receives or has a financial interest in an application submitted to the board or a project, development, or venture related to the approval of the application; or

    (c) Solicits, accepts, or seeks anything of economic value as a gift, gratuity, or favor from any person, firm, or corporation involved in the application.

    (2) ((A commissioner of a water conservancy board who also serves as an employee or upon the governing body of a municipally owned water system, shall not participate in the board's review or decision upon an application for the transfer or change of a water right in which that water system has or is proposed to have an ownership interest.))  The department shall return a record of decision to a conservancy board without action where the department determines that any member of a board has violated subsection (1) of this section.

    (a) If a person seeking to rely on this section to disqualify a commissioner knows of the basis for disqualification before the time the board issues a record of decision, the person must request the board to have the commissioner recuse himself or herself from further involvement in processing the application, or be barred from later raising that challenge.

    (b) If the commissioner does not recuse himself or herself or if the person becomes aware of the basis for disqualification after the board issues a record of decision but within the time period under RCW 90.80.080(3) for filing objections with the department, the person must raise the challenge with the department.  If the department determines that the commissioner should be disqualified under this section, the director must remand the record of decision to the board for reconsideration and resubmission of a record of decision.  The disqualified commissioner shall not participate in any further board review of the application.  The department's decision on whether to remand a record of decision under this section may only be appealed at the same time and in the same manner as an appeal of the department's decision to affirm, modify, or reverse the record of decision after remand.

    (c) If the person becomes aware of the basis for disqualification after the time for filing objections with the department, the person may raise the challenge in an appeal of the department's final decision under RCW 90.80.090.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16.  A new section is added to chapter 90.80 RCW to read as follows:

    A water conservancy board may be formally dissolved by the county or jointly by the counties as applicable in which it operates by adoption of a resolution of the county legislative authority or authorities.  Notice of the dissolution must be provided to the director.  The department may petition the county legislative authority of the county or the lead county for a board to request that the board be dissolved for repeated statutory violations or demonstrated inability to perform the functions for which the board was created.

 

    Sec. 17.  RCW 90.80.130 and 1997 c 441 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:

    Water conservancy board activities are subject to the open public meetings act, chapter 42.30 RCW and to chapter 42.32 RCWThis includes announcing meetings in advance.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 18.  A new section is added to chapter 90.80 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) A board is subject to the requirements of chapter 42.17 RCW.  Each board must establish and maintain records of its proceedings and determinations.  While in the possession of the board, all such records must be made available for inspection and copies must be provided to the public on request under the provisions of chapter 42.17 RCW.

    (2) Upon the conclusion of its business involving a water right transfer application, a board must promptly send the original copies of all records relating to that application to the department for recordkeeping.  A board may keep a copy of the original documents.  After the records are transferred to the department, the responsibility for making the records available under chapter 42.17 RCW is transferred to the department.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 19.  A new section is added to chapter 90.80 RCW to read as follows:

    For purposes of carrying out the official business of a board, a quorum consists of the physical presence of two of the three members of a three-member board or three of the five members of a five-member board.  A board may operate with one or two vacant positions as long as it meets the quorum requirement.

 

    Sec. 20.  RCW 90.80.140 and 1997 c 441 s 18 are each amended to read as follows:

    Nothing in this chapter affects transfers that may be otherwise approved under chapter 90.03 or 90.44 RCW.

 

    Sec. 21.  RCW 90.80.150 and 1997 c 441 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:

    The department shall report biennially by December 31st of each even-numbered year to the appropriate committees of the legislature on the boards formed or sought to be formed under the authority of this chapter, the transfer applications reviewed and other activities conducted by the boards, and the funding of such boards.  Conservancy boards must provide information regarding their activities to the department to assist the department in preparing the report.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 22.  It is the intent of the legislature to help preserve the agricultural economy of the state by allowing changes of family farm water permits from agricultural irrigation to other agricultural purposes.  Within the urbanizing areas of the state, the legislature recognizes the need to allow water from family farms to be converted to other purposes as the use of the land changes consistent with adopted land use plans.  The legislature also intends to allow farmers to benefit from water conservation projects and from temporary leases of their family farm water permits.  Water conservation and water leases will also allow farmers to contribute to instream flows and other purposes.  However, outside of urbanizing areas, the legislature intends to preserve farmlands by ensuring that the quantity of water needed to grow the crops historically grown remains with the farm.  In addition, to help retain family farms within the state, the legislature intends to allow family farms of a large enough size to be economically viable under modern agricultural market conditions.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 23.  A new section is added to chapter 90.66 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) Transfers of water rights established as family farm permits under this chapter may be approved as authorized under this section and under RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100 or chapter 90.80 RCW as appropriate.

    (2) A family farm permit may be transferred:

    (a) For use for agricultural irrigation purposes as limited by RCW 90.66.060 (1) and (2);

    (b) To any purpose of use that is a beneficial use of water if the transfer is made exclusively under a lease agreement, except that transfers for the use of water for agricultural irrigation purposes shall be limited as provided by RCW 90.66.060 (1) and (2);

    (c) To any purpose of use that is a beneficial use of water if the water right is for the use of water at a location that is, at the time the transfer is approved, within the boundaries of an urban growth area designated under chapter 36.70A RCW or, in counties not planning under chapter 36.70A RCW, within a city or town or within areas designated for urban growth in comprehensive plans prepared under chapter 36.70 RCW, except that transfers for the use of water for agricultural irrigation purposes shall be limited as provided by RCW 90.66.060 (1) and (2).

    (3) If a portion of the water governed by a water right established under the authority of a family farm permit is made surplus to the beneficial uses exercised under the right through the implementation of practices or technologies, including but not limited to conveyance practices or technologies, that are more water-use efficient than those under which the right was perfected, the right to use the surplus water may be transferred to any purpose of use that is a beneficial use of water.  Nothing in this subsection authorizes:  A transfer of the portion of a water right that is necessary for the production of crops historically grown under the right; or a transfer of a water right or a portion of a water right that has not been perfected through beneficial use before the transfer.  Water right transfers approved under this subsection must be consistent with the provisions of RCW 90.03.380(1).

    (4) Before a change in purpose of a family farm water permit to municipal supply purpose or domestic purpose may be authorized, the public water system that is receiving the family farm water permit must be meeting the water conservation requirements of its current water system plan approved by the department of health or its small water system management program.

    (5) The place of use for a water right transferred under the authority of this section shall remain within:  The water resource inventory area containing the place of use for the water right before the transfer; or the urban growth area or contiguous urban growth areas of the place of use for the water right before the transfer if the urban growth area or contiguous urban growth areas cross boundaries of water resource inventory areas.

    (6) The authority granted by this section to transfer or alter the purpose of use of a water right established under the authority of a family farm permit shall not be construed as limiting in any manner the authority granted by RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100 to alter other elements of such a water right.

 

    Sec. 24.  RCW 90.66.040 and 1979 c 3 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

    For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall be applicable:

    (1) "Family farm" means a geographic area including not more than ((two)) six thousand acres of irrigated agricultural lands, whether contiguous or noncontiguous, the controlling interest in which is held by a person having a controlling interest in no more than ((two)) six thousand acres of irrigated agricultural lands in the state of Washington which are irrigated under rights acquired after December 8, 1977.

    (2) "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, organization, or other entity whatsoever, whether public or private.  The term "person" shall include as one person all corporate or partnership entities with a common ownership of more than one-half of the assets of each of any number of such entities.

    (3) "Controlling interest" means a property interest that can be transferred to another person, the percentage interest so transferred being sufficient to effect a change in control of the landlord's rights and benefits.  Ownership of property held in trust shall not be deemed a controlling interest where no part of the trust has been established through expenditure or assignment of assets of the beneficiary of the trust and where the rights of the family farm permit which is a part of the trust cannot be transferred to another by the beneficiary of the trust under terms of the trust.  Each trust of a separate donor origin shall be treated as a separate entity and the administration of property under trust shall not represent a controlling interest on the part of the trust officer.

    (4) "Department" means the department of ecology of the state of Washington.

    (5) "Application", "permit" and "public waters" shall have the meanings attributed to these terms in chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW.

    (6) "Public water entity" means any public or governmental entity with authority to administer and operate a system to supply water for irrigation of agricultural lands.

    (7) "Transfer" means a transfer, change, or amendment to part or all of a water right authorized under RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100 or chapter 90.80 RCW.

    (8) "Withdraw" means to withdraw ground water or to divert surface water.

 

    Sec. 25.  RCW 90.66.060 and 1979 c 3 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, the right to withdraw water for use for the irrigation of agricultural lands under authority of a family farm permit shall have no time limit ((but)) and shall be conditioned upon the land being irrigated complying with the definition of a family farm as defined at the time the permit is issued((:  PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That)).

    (2) If the acquisition by any person of land and water rights by gift, devise, bequest, or by way of bona fide satisfaction of a debt, would otherwise cause land being irrigated pursuant to a family farm permit to lose its status as a family farm, such acquisition shall be deemed to have no effect upon the status of family farm water permits pertaining to land held or acquired by the person acquiring such land and water rights if all lands held or acquired are again in compliance with the definition of a family farm within five years from the date of such acquisition.

    (((2))) (3) For family farm permits under this chapter, if the department determines that water is being withdrawn ((under a family farm permit)) for use on land not in conformity with the definition of a family farm, the department shall notify the holder of such family farm permit by personal service of such fact and the permit shall be suspended two years from the date of receipt of notice unless the person having a controlling interest in said land satisfies the department that such land is again in conformity with the definition of a family farm.  The department may, upon a showing of good cause and reasonable effort to attain compliance on the part of the person having the controlling interest in such land, extend the two year period prior to suspension.  If conformity is not achieved prior to five years from the date of notice the rights of withdrawal shall be canceled.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 26.  A new section is added to chapter 82.16 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) The legislature intends to provide an incentive for water distribution businesses to help reduce their customers' use of water through measures such as:  Water conservation and outreach programs, distributing shower flow restrictors, toilet tank water displacement devices, and leak detection dye tablets; providing water-efficient fixtures at no cost, giving a rebate for customer-purchased fixtures, or arranging for suppliers to provide fixtures at a reduced price; providing plants for low-water demand landscaping, moisture sensors, flow timers, low-volume sprinklers, and drip irrigation systems; and using conservation pricing and billings that show percentage increase/decrease in water use over the same period from the previous year.

    (2) In computing tax under this chapter, there shall be deducted from the gross income seventy-five percent of those amounts expended to improve consumers' efficiency of water use or to otherwise reduce the use of water by the consumer when the expenditures are implementing elements of the conservation plan within a state approved water system plan or a small water system management program.  Total deductions taken under this subsection and the resulting tax savings shall be reported to the department of revenue at the time the tax is due.

    (3) This chapter does not apply to seventy-five percent of the amounts received for water services supplied by an entity that holds a permit under RCW 90.46.030 when the water supplied is reclaimed water as defined in RCW 90.46.010.  Total deductions taken under this subsection and the resulting tax savings shall be reported to the department of revenue at the time the tax is due.

    (4)(a) There is created in the state general fund the state water rights trust account.  Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation.  Expenditures from the account may be used by the department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fish and wildlife, only to purchase or lease water rights to augment instream flows in streams supporting fish stocks that are listed as threatened or endangered under federal law or listed as depressed or threatened by reason of inadequate stream flows under state law.

    (b) The legislature intends that an amount equal to one-third of the total tax savings resulting from this section in each state fiscal year shall be appropriated from the general fund‑-state to the state water rights trust account.  The department of revenue shall calculate the total amount of tax savings reported by water suppliers under this section and shall report this amount to the office of financial management and the appropriate committees of the legislature by October 1st of each calendar year.

    (5) This section expires June 30, 2003.

 

    Sec. 27.  RCW 90.14.140 and 1998 c 258 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) For the purposes of RCW 90.14.130 through 90.14.180, "sufficient cause" shall be defined as the nonuse of all or a portion of the water by the owner of a water right for a period of five or more consecutive years where such nonuse occurs as a result of:

    (a) Drought, or other unavailability of water;

    (b) Active service in the armed forces of the United States during military crisis;

    (c) Nonvoluntary service in the armed forces of the United States;

    (d) The operation of legal proceedings;

    (e) Federal or state agency leases of or options to purchase lands or water rights which preclude or reduce the use of the right by the owner of the water right;

    (f) Federal laws imposing land or water use restrictions either directly or through the voluntary enrollment of a landowner in a federal program implementing those laws, or acreage limitations, or production quotas.

    (2) Notwithstanding any other provisions of RCW 90.14.130 through 90.14.180, there shall be no relinquishment of any water right:

    (a) If such right is claimed for power development purposes under chapter 90.16 RCW and annual license fees are paid in accordance with chapter 90.16 RCW;

    (b) If such right is used for a standby or reserve water supply to be used in time of drought or other low flow period so long as withdrawal or diversion facilities are maintained in good operating condition for the use of such reserve or standby water supply;

    (c) If such right is claimed for a determined future development to take place either within fifteen years of July 1, 1967, or the most recent beneficial use of the water right, whichever date is later;

    (d) If such right is claimed for municipal water supply purposes under chapter 90.03 RCW;

    (e) If such waters are not subject to appropriation under the applicable provisions of RCW 90.40.030; ((or))

    (f) If such right or portion of the right is leased to another person for use on land other than the land to which the right is appurtenant as long as the lessee makes beneficial use of the right in accordance with this chapter and a transfer or change of the right has been approved by the department in accordance with RCW 90.03.380, 90.03.383, 90.03.390, or 90.44.100; or

    (g) If such right is a trust water right under chapter 90.38 or 90.42 RCW.

    (3) In adding provisions to this section by this act, the legislature does not intend to imply legislative approval or disapproval of any existing administrative policy regarding, or any existing administrative or judicial interpretation of, the provisions of this section not expressly added or revised.

 

    Sec. 28.  RCW 90.38.020 and 1989 c 429 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1)(a) The department may acquire water rights, including but not limited to storage rights, by purchase, lease, gift, or other appropriate means other than by condemnation, from any person or entity or combination of persons or entities.  Once acquired, such rights are trust water rights.  A water right acquired by the state that is expressly conditioned to limit its use to instream purposes shall be administered as a trust water right in compliance with that condition.

    (b) If an aquatic species is listed as threatened or endangered under federal law for a body of water, or is listed as depressed or threatened by reason of inadequate stream flows under state law, and the holder of a right to water from the body of water chooses to donate all or a portion of the person's water right to the trust water system to assist in providing those instream flows on a temporary or permanent basis, the department shall accept the donation on such terms as the person may prescribe as long as the donation satisfies the requirements of subsection (4) of this section and the other applicable requirements of this chapter and the terms prescribed are relevant and material to protecting any interest in the water right retained by the donor.  Once accepted, such rights are trust water rights within the conditions prescribed by the donor.

    (2) The department may make such other arrangements, including entry into contracts with other persons or entities as appropriate to ensure that trust water rights acquired in accordance with this chapter can be exercised to the fullest possible extent.

    (3) The trust water rights may be acquired on a temporary or permanent basis.

    (4) A water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section shall not exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the donation nor may the total of any portion of the water right remaining with the donor plus the donated portion of the water right exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the donation.  A water right holder who believes his or her water right has been impaired by a trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section may request that the department review the impairment claim.  If the department determines that exercising the trust water right resulting from the donation or exercising a portion of that trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section is impairing existing water rights in violation of RCW 90.38.902, the trust water right shall be altered by the department to eliminate the impairment.  Any decision of the department to alter or not alter a trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section is appealable to the pollution control hearings board under RCW 43.21B.230.  A donated water right's status as a trust water right under this subsection is not evidence of the validity or quantity of the water right.

    (5) Any water right conveyed to the trust water right system as a gift that is expressly conditioned to limit its use to instream purposes shall be managed by the department for public purposes to ensure that it qualifies as a gift that is deductible for federal income taxation purposes for the person or entity conveying the water right.

    (6) If the department acquires a trust water right by lease in an area in which a drought order has been issued under RCW 43.83B.405 and is in effect at the time the department leases the water right, the amount of the trust water right shall not exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the acquisition was made nor may the total of any portion of the water right remaining with the original water right holder plus the portion of the water right leased by the department exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the acquisition.  A water right holder who believes his or her water right has been impaired by a trust water right leased under this subsection may request that the department review the impairment claim.  If the department determines that exercising the trust water right resulting from the leasing or exercising a portion of that trust water right leased under this subsection is impairing existing water rights in violation of RCW 90.38.902, the trust water right shall be altered by the department to eliminate the impairment.  Any decision of the department to alter or not to alter a trust water right leased under this subsection is appealable to the pollution control hearings board under RCW 43.21B.230.  The department's leasing of a trust water right under this subsection is not evidence of the validity or quantity of the water right.

    (7) For a water right donated to or acquired by the trust water rights program on a temporary basis, the full quantity of water diverted or withdrawn to exercise the right before the donation or acquisition shall be placed in the trust water rights program and shall revert to the donor or person from whom it was acquired when the trust period ends.

 

    Sec. 29.  RCW 90.38.040 and 1994 c 264 s 90 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) All trust water rights acquired by the department shall be placed in the Yakima river basin trust water rights program to be managed by the department.  The department shall issue a water right certificate in the name of the state of Washington for each trust water right it acquires.

    (2) Trust water rights shall retain the same priority date as the water right from which they originated.  Trust water rights may be modified as to purpose or place of use or point of diversion, including modification from a diversionary use to a nondiversionary instream use.

    (3) Trust water rights may be held by the department for instream flows ((and/or)), irrigation use, or other beneficial use.  Trust water rights may be acquired on a temporary or permanent basis.  To the extent practicable and subject to legislative appropriation, trust water rights acquired in an area with an approved watershed plan developed under chapter 90.82 RCW shall be consistent with that plan if the plan calls for such acquisition.

    (4) A schedule of the amount of net water saved as a result of water conservation projects carried out in accordance with this chapter, shall be developed annually to reflect the predicted hydrologic and water supply conditions, as well as anticipated water demands, for the upcoming irrigation season.  This schedule shall serve as the basis for the distribution and management of trust water rights each year.

    (5)(a) No exercise of a trust water right may be authorized unless the department first determines that no existing water rights, junior or senior in priority, will be impaired as to their exercise or injured in any manner whatever by such authorization.

    (b) Before any trust water right is exercised, the department shall publish notice thereof in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county or counties in which the storage, diversion, and use are to be made, and in such other newspapers as the department determines are necessary, once a week for two consecutive weeks.  At the same time the department may also send notice thereof containing pertinent information to the director of fish and wildlife.

    (c) Subsections (4) and (5)(b) of this section do not apply to a trust water right resulting from a donation for instream flows described in RCW 90.38.020(1)(b) or from the lease of a water right under RCW 90.38.020(6) if the period of the lease does not exceed five years.  However, the department shall provide the notice described in (b) of this subsection the first time the trust water right resulting from the donation is exercised.

    (6) RCW 90.03.380 and 90.14.140 through 90.14.910 shall have no applicability to trust water rights held by the department under this chapter or exercised under this section.

 

    Sec. 30.  RCW 90.42.040 and 1993 c 98 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) All trust water rights acquired by the state shall be placed in the state trust water rights program to be managed by the department.  Trust water rights acquired by the state shall be held or authorized for use by the department for instream flows, irrigation, municipal, or other beneficial uses consistent with applicable regional plans for pilot planning areas, or to resolve critical water supply problems.  To the extent practicable and subject to legislative appropriation, trust water rights acquired in an area with an approved watershed plan developed under chapter 90.82 RCW shall be consistent with that plan if the plan calls for such acquisition.

    (2) The department shall issue a water right certificate in the name of the state of Washington for each permanent trust water right conveyed to the state indicating the reach or reaches of the stream, the quantity, and the use or uses to which it may be applied.  A superseding certificate shall be issued that specifies the amount of water the water right holder would continue to be entitled to as a result of the water conservation project.  The superseding certificate shall retain the same priority date as the original right.  For nonpermanent conveyances, the department shall issue certificates or such other instruments as are necessary to reflect the changes in purpose or place of use or point of diversion or withdrawal.  ((Water rights for which such nonpermanent conveyances are arranged shall not be subject to relinquishment for nonuse.))

    (3) A trust water right retains the same priority date as the water right from which it originated, but as between them the trust right shall be deemed to be inferior in priority unless otherwise specified by an agreement between the state and the party holding the original right.

    (4) Exercise of a trust water right may be authorized only if the department first determines that neither water rights existing at the time the trust water right is established, nor the public interest will be impaired.  If impairment becomes apparent during the time a trust water right is being exercised, the department shall cease or modify the use of the trust water right to eliminate the impairment.

    (5) Before any trust water right is created or modified, the department shall, at a minimum, require that a notice be published in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county or counties in which the storage, diversion, and use are to be made, and in other newspapers as the department determines is necessary, once a week for two consecutive weeks.  At the same time the department shall send a notice containing pertinent information to all appropriate state agencies, potentially affected local governments and federally recognized tribal governments, and other interested parties.

    (6) RCW 90.14.140 through 90.14.230 have no applicability to trust water rights held by the department under this chapter or exercised under this section.

    (7) RCW 90.03.380 has no applicability to trust water rights acquired by the state through the funding of water conservation projects.

    (8) Subsections (4) and (5) of this section do not apply to a trust water right resulting from a donation for instream flows described in RCW 90.42.080(1)(b) or to a trust water right leased under RCW 90.42.080(8) if the period of the lease does not exceed five years.  However, the department shall provide the notice described in subsection (5) of this section the first time the trust water right resulting from the donation is exercised.

 

    Sec. 31.  RCW 90.42.080 and 1993 c 98 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1)(a) The state may acquire all or portions of existing water rights, by purchase, gift, or other appropriate means other than by condemnation, from any person or entity or combination of persons or entities.  Once acquired, such rights are trust water rights.  A water right acquired by the state that is expressly conditioned to limit its use to instream purposes shall be administered as a trust water right in compliance with that condition.

    (b) If an aquatic species is listed as threatened or endangered under federal law for a body of water, or is listed as depressed or threatened by reason of inadequate stream flow under state law, and the holder of a right to water from the body of water chooses to donate all or a portion of the person's water right to the trust water system to assist in providing those instream flows on a temporary or permanent basis, the department shall accept the donation on such terms as the person may prescribe as long as the donation satisfies the requirements of subsection (4) of this section and the other applicable requirements of this chapter and the terms prescribed are relevant and material to protecting any interest in the water right retained by the donor.  Once accepted, such rights are trust water rights within the conditions prescribed by the donor.

    (2) The department may enter into leases, contracts, or such other arrangements with other persons or entities as appropriate, to ensure that trust water rights acquired in accordance with this chapter may be exercised to the fullest possible extent.

    (3) Trust water rights may be acquired by the state on a temporary or permanent basis.

    (4) A water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section shall not exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the donation nor may the total of any portion of the water right remaining with the donor plus the donated portion of the water right exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the donation.  A water right holder who believes his or her water right has been impaired by a trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section may request that the department review the impairment claim.  If the department determines that exercising the trust water right resulting from the donation or exercising a portion of that trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section is impairing existing water rights in violation of RCW 90.42.070, the trust water right shall be altered by the department to eliminate the impairment.  Any decision of the department to alter or not to alter a trust water right donated under subsection (1)(b) of this section is appealable to the pollution control hearings board under RCW 43.21B.230.  A donated water right's status as a trust water right under this subsection is not evidence of the validity or quantity of the water right.

    (5) The provisions of RCW 90.03.380 and 90.03.390 do not apply to donations for instream flows described in subsection (1)(b) of this section, but do apply to other transfers of water rights under this section.

    (((5))) (6) No funds may be expended for the purchase of water rights by the state pursuant to this section unless specifically appropriated for this purpose by the legislature.

    (7) Any water right conveyed to the trust water right system as a gift that is expressly conditioned to limit its use to instream purposes shall be managed by the department for public purposes to ensure that it qualifies as a gift that is deductible for federal income taxation purposes for the person or entity conveying the water right.

    (8) If the department acquires a trust water right by lease in an area in which a drought order has been issued under RCW 43.83B.405 and is in effect at the time the department leases the water right, the amount of the trust water right shall not exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the acquisition was made nor may the total of any portion of the water right remaining with the original water right holder plus the portion of the water right leased by the department exceed the extent to which the water right was exercised during the five years before the acquisition.  A water right holder who believes his or her water right has been impaired by a trust water right leased under this subsection may request that the department review the impairment claim.  If the department determines that exercising the trust water right resulting from the leasing or exercising a portion of that trust water right leased under this subsection is impairing existing water rights in violation of RCW 90.42.070, the trust water right shall be altered by the department to eliminate the impairment.  Any decision of the department to alter or not to alter a trust water right leased under this subsection is appealable to the pollution control hearings board under RCW 43.21B.230.  The department's leasing of a trust water right under this subsection is not evidence of the validity or quantity of the water right.

    (9) For a water right donated to or acquired by the trust water rights program on a temporary basis, the full quantity of water diverted or withdrawn to exercise the right before the donation or acquisition shall be placed in the trust water rights program and shall revert to the donor or person from whom it was acquired when the trust period ends.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 32.  (1) By December 31, 2004, the department of ecology must report to the appropriate legislative committees the pertinent experience acquired in implementing the various components of this act that are under its jurisdiction.

    (2) Beginning December 31, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2004, the department of ecology shall report to the legislature by January 1st of each year on the results of processing applications under RCW 90.03.380(5) and processing applications through water conservancy boards under chapter 90.80 RCW.  In the report due on December 31, 2004, the department of ecology shall provide an evaluation and make recommendations regarding modification of any of the provisions of RCW 90.03.380(5).

    (3) By October 1, 2001, the office of financial management must complete an assessment of watershed planning, including evaluation of the performance of both watershed planning units and state agencies involved in watershed planning.  The office's assessment must address the progress of planning units toward completion of watershed plans and the use of funds provided by the state of Washington to planning units and state agencies for developing those plans.  The assessment must include an assessment of the progress of planning units and the department of ecology in setting instream flows.  The office must report the results of the assessment to the appropriate committees of the legislature, and the governor.

    (4) Beginning December 31, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2004, the office of financial management shall review and report to the legislature by January 1st of each year on whether the department of ecology has adequate funding for fulfilling the department's responsibilities for processing applications through water conservancy boards under chapter 90.80 RCW.

    (5) The office of financial management, in consultation with the departments of revenue, health, and ecology, must evaluate the long-term revenue impacts and the costs and benefits of the deductions and exclusions authorized by section 26 of this act.  The office of financial management must also evaluate the costs and benefits and revenue impacts of other potential water conservation tax incentives, including but not limited to those that may involve the sales, use, property, utility, and business and occupations taxes.  The office of financial management must report its findings regarding tax incentives by December 31, 2001, to the legislature's standing committees with jurisdiction over water resources and the legislative fiscal committees.

    (6) The office of financial management, in consultation with the departments of health and ecology, must evaluate the level of water savings occurring from water suppliers' use of the tax incentive provisions in section 26 of this act and must report its findings to the legislature by December 31, 2002.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 33.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 34.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.

 


                            --- END ---