S-0145.1  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 5005

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By Senators Roach, West and McCaslin

 

Read first time 01/08/2001.  Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

Making all first degree murders subject to life without possibility of parole or the death penalty.


    AN ACT Relating to murder in the first degree; amending RCW 9A.32.040, 9.94A.110, 9.94A.560, 10.95.030, 10.95.050, 10.95.060, 10.95.090, 10.95.120, 43.43.830, and 43.330.190; reenacting and amending RCW 9.94A.320 and 9.94A.440; repealing RCW 10.95.020 and 10.95.040; and prescribing penalties.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 9A.32.040 and 1982 c 10 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    Notwithstanding RCW 9A.32.030(2), any person convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree shall be sentenced ((to life imprisonment)) as provided in chapter 10.95 RCW.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 9.94A.110 and 2000 c 75 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Before imposing a sentence upon a defendant, the court shall conduct a sentencing hearing.  The sentencing hearing shall be held within forty court days following conviction.  Upon the motion of either party for good cause shown, or on its own motion, the court may extend the time period for conducting the sentencing hearing.

    Except in cases where the defendant shall be sentenced to a term of total confinement for life without the possibility of release or, when authorized by RCW 10.95.030 ((for the crime of aggravated murder in the first degree)), sentenced to death, the court may order the department to complete a risk assessment report.  If available before sentencing, the report shall be provided to the court.

    Unless specifically waived by the court, the court shall order the department to complete a chemical dependency screening report before imposing a sentence upon a defendant who has been convicted of a violation of the uniform controlled substances act under chapter 69.50 RCW or a criminal solicitation to commit such a violation under chapter 9A.28 RCW where the court finds that the offender has a chemical dependency that has contributed to his or her offense.  In addition, the court shall, at the time of plea or conviction, order the department to complete a presentence report before imposing a sentence upon a defendant who has been convicted of a felony sexual offense.  The department of corrections shall give priority to presentence investigations for sexual offenders.  If the court determines that the defendant may be a mentally ill person as defined in RCW 71.24.025, although the defendant has not established that at the time of the crime he or she lacked the capacity to commit the crime, was incompetent to commit the crime, or was insane at the time of the crime, the court shall order the department to complete a presentence report before imposing a sentence.

    The court shall consider the risk assessment report and presentence reports, if any, including any victim impact statement and criminal history, and allow arguments from the prosecutor, the defense counsel, the offender, the victim, the survivor of the victim, or a representative of the victim or survivor, and an investigative law enforcement officer as to the sentence to be imposed.

    If the court is satisfied by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has a criminal history, the court shall specify the convictions it has found to exist.  All of this information shall be part of the record.  Copies of all risk assessment reports and presentence reports presented to the sentencing court and all written findings of facts and conclusions of law as to sentencing entered by the court shall be sent to the department by the clerk of the court at the conclusion of the sentencing and shall accompany the offender if the offender is committed to the custody of the department.  Court clerks shall provide, without charge, certified copies of documents relating to criminal convictions requested by prosecuting attorneys.

    (2) To prevent wrongful disclosure of information related to mental health services, as defined in RCW 71.05.445 and 71.34.225, a court may take only those steps necessary during a sentencing hearing or any hearing in which the department presents information related to mental health services to the court.  The steps may be taken on motion of the defendant, the prosecuting attorney, or on the court's own motion.  The court may seal the portion of the record relating to information relating to mental health services, exclude the public from the hearing during presentation or discussion of information relating to mental health services, or grant other relief to achieve the result intended by this subsection, but nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent the subsequent release of information related to mental health services as authorized by RCW 71.05.445, 71.34.225, or 72.09.585.  Any person who otherwise is permitted to attend any hearing pursuant to chapter 7.69 or 7.69A RCW shall not be excluded from the hearing solely because the department intends to disclose or discloses information related to mental health services.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 9.94A.320 and 2000 c 225 s 5, 2000 c 119 s 17, and 2000 c 66 s 2 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

                              TABLE 2

 

           CRIMES INCLUDED WITHIN EACH SERIOUSNESS LEVEL

 

XVI((Aggravated)) Murder 1 (RCW ((10.95.020)) 9A.32.030)

 

XVHomicide by abuse (RCW 9A.32.055)

    Malicious explosion 1 (RCW 70.74.280(1))

    ((Murder 1 (RCW 9A.32.030)))

 

XIVMurder 2 (RCW 9A.32.050)

 

XIIIMalicious explosion 2 (RCW 70.74.280(2))

Malicious placement of an explosive 1 (RCW 70.74.270(1))

 

XIIAssault 1 (RCW 9A.36.011)

Assault of a Child 1 (RCW 9A.36.120)

Malicious placement of an imitation device 1 (RCW 70.74.272(1)(a))

Rape 1 (RCW 9A.44.040)

Rape of a Child 1 (RCW 9A.44.073)

 

XIManslaughter 1 (RCW 9A.32.060)

Rape 2 (RCW 9A.44.050)

Rape of a Child 2 (RCW 9A.44.076)

 

XChild Molestation 1 (RCW 9A.44.083)

Indecent Liberties (with forcible compulsion) (RCW 9A.44.100(1)(a))

Kidnapping 1 (RCW 9A.40.020)

Leading Organized Crime (RCW 9A.82.060(1)(a))

Malicious explosion 3 (RCW 70.74.280(3))

Manufacture of methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(ii))

Over 18 and deliver heroin, methamphetamine, a narcotic from Schedule I or II, or flunitrazepam from Schedule IV to someone under 18 (RCW 69.50.406)

 

IXAssault of a Child 2 (RCW 9A.36.130)

Controlled Substance Homicide (RCW 69.50.415)

Explosive devices prohibited (RCW 70.74.180)

Homicide by Watercraft, by being under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug (RCW 79A.60.050)

Inciting Criminal Profiteering (RCW 9A.82.060(1)(b))

Malicious placement of an explosive 2 (RCW 70.74.270(2))

Over 18 and deliver narcotic from Schedule III, IV, or V or a nonnarcotic, except flunitrazepam or methamphetamine, from Schedule I-V to someone under 18 and 3 years junior (RCW 69.50.406)

Robbery 1 (RCW 9A.56.200)

Sexual Exploitation (RCW 9.68A.040)

Vehicular Homicide, by being under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug (RCW 46.61.520)

 

VIIIArson 1 (RCW 9A.48.020)

Deliver or possess with intent to deliver methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(ii))

Hit and Run‑-Death (RCW 46.52.020(4)(a))

Homicide by Watercraft, by the operation of any vessel in a reckless manner (RCW 79A.60.050)

Manslaughter 2 (RCW 9A.32.070)

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver amphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(ii))

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver heroin or cocaine (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(i))

Possession of Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, or Anhydrous Ammonia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.440)

Promoting Prostitution 1 (RCW 9A.88.070)

Selling for profit (controlled or counterfeit) any controlled substance (RCW 69.50.410)

Theft of Anhydrous Ammonia (RCW 69.55.010)

Vehicular Homicide, by the operation of any vehicle in a reckless manner (RCW 46.61.520)

 

VIIBurglary 1 (RCW 9A.52.020)

Child Molestation 2 (RCW 9A.44.086)

Dealing in depictions of minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct (RCW 9.68A.050)

Drive-by Shooting (RCW 9A.36.045)

Homicide by Watercraft, by disregard for the safety of others (RCW  79A.60.050)

Indecent Liberties (without forcible compulsion) (RCW 9A.44.100(1) (b) and (c))

Introducing Contraband 1 (RCW 9A.76.140)

Involving a minor in drug dealing (RCW 69.50.401(f))

Malicious placement of an explosive 3 (RCW 70.74.270(3))

Sending, bringing into state depictions of minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct (RCW 9.68A.060)

Unlawful Possession of a Firearm in the first degree (RCW 9.41.040(1)(a))

Use of a Machine Gun in Commission of a Felony (RCW 9.41.225)

Vehicular Homicide, by disregard for the safety of others (RCW 46.61.520)

 

VIBail Jumping with Murder 1 (RCW 9A.76.170(2)(a))

Bribery (RCW 9A.68.010)

Incest 1 (RCW 9A.64.020(1))

Intimidating a Judge (RCW 9A.72.160)

Intimidating a Juror/Witness (RCW 9A.72.110, 9A.72.130)

Malicious placement of an imitation device 2 (RCW 70.74.272(1)(b))

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver narcotics from Schedule I or II (except heroin or cocaine) or flunitrazepam from Schedule IV (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(i))

Rape of a Child 3 (RCW 9A.44.079)

Theft of a Firearm (RCW 9A.56.300)

Unlawful Storage of Anhydrous Ammonia (RCW 69.55.020)

 

VAbandonment of dependent person 1 (RCW 9A.42.060)

Advancing money or property for extortionate extension of credit (RCW 9A.82.030)

Bail Jumping with class A Felony (RCW 9A.76.170(2)(b))

Child Molestation 3 (RCW 9A.44.089)

Criminal Mistreatment 1 (RCW 9A.42.020)

Custodial Sexual Misconduct 1 (RCW 9A.44.160)

Delivery of imitation controlled substance by person eighteen or over to person under eighteen (RCW 69.52.030(2))

Domestic Violence Court Order Violation (RCW 10.99.040, 10.99.050, 26.09.300, 26.10.220, 26.26.138, 26.50.110, 26.52.070, or 74.34.145)

Extortion 1 (RCW 9A.56.120)

Extortionate Extension of Credit (RCW 9A.82.020)

Extortionate Means to Collect Extensions of Credit (RCW 9A.82.040)

Incest 2 (RCW 9A.64.020(2))

Kidnapping 2 (RCW 9A.40.030)

Perjury 1 (RCW 9A.72.020)

Persistent prison misbehavior (RCW 9.94.070)

Possession of a Stolen Firearm (RCW 9A.56.310)

Rape 3 (RCW 9A.44.060)

Rendering Criminal Assistance 1 (RCW 9A.76.070)

Sexual Misconduct with a Minor 1 (RCW 9A.44.093)

Sexually Violating Human Remains (RCW 9A.44.105)

Stalking (RCW 9A.46.110)

 

IVArson 2 (RCW 9A.48.030)

Assault 2 (RCW 9A.36.021)

Assault by Watercraft (RCW 79A.60.060)

Bribing a Witness/Bribe Received by Witness (RCW 9A.72.090, 9A.72.100)

Commercial Bribery (RCW 9A.68.060)

Counterfeiting (RCW 9.16.035(4))

Escape 1 (RCW 9A.76.110)

Hit and Run‑-Injury (RCW 46.52.020(4)(b))

Hit and Run with Vessel‑-Injury Accident (RCW 79A.60.200(3))

Indecent Exposure to Person Under Age Fourteen (subsequent sex offense) (RCW 9A.88.010)

Influencing Outcome of Sporting Event (RCW 9A.82.070)

Knowingly Trafficking in Stolen Property (RCW 9A.82.050(2))

Malicious Harassment (RCW 9A.36.080)

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver narcotics from Schedule III, IV, or V or nonnarcotics from Schedule I-V (except marijuana, amphetamine, methamphetamines, or flunitrazepam) (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1) (iii) through (v))

Residential Burglary (RCW 9A.52.025)

Robbery 2 (RCW 9A.56.210)

Theft of Livestock 1 (RCW 9A.56.080)

Threats to Bomb (RCW 9.61.160)

Use of Proceeds of Criminal Profiteering (RCW 9A.82.080 (1) and (2))

Vehicular Assault (RCW 46.61.522)

Willful Failure to Return from Furlough (RCW 72.66.060)

 

IIIAbandonment of dependent person 2 (RCW 9A.42.070)

Assault 3 (RCW 9A.36.031)

Assault of a Child 3 (RCW 9A.36.140)

Bail Jumping with class B or C Felony (RCW 9A.76.170(2)(c))

Burglary 2 (RCW 9A.52.030)

Communication with a Minor for Immoral Purposes (RCW 9.68A.090)

Criminal Gang Intimidation (RCW 9A.46.120)

Criminal Mistreatment 2 (RCW 9A.42.030)

Custodial Assault (RCW 9A.36.100)

Delivery of a material in lieu of a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.401(c))

Escape 2 (RCW 9A.76.120)

Extortion 2 (RCW 9A.56.130)

Harassment (RCW 9A.46.020)

Intimidating a Public Servant (RCW 9A.76.180)

Introducing Contraband 2 (RCW 9A.76.150)

Maintaining a Dwelling or Place for Controlled Substances (RCW 69.50.402(a)(6))

Malicious Injury to Railroad Property (RCW 81.60.070)

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver marijuana (RCW 69.50.401(a)(1)(iii))

Manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute an imitation controlled substance (RCW 69.52.030(1))

Patronizing a Juvenile Prostitute (RCW 9.68A.100)

Perjury 2 (RCW 9A.72.030)

Possession of Incendiary Device (RCW 9.40.120)

Possession of Machine Gun or Short-Barreled Shotgun or Rifle (RCW 9.41.190)

Promoting Prostitution 2 (RCW 9A.88.080)

  Recklessly Trafficking in Stolen Property (RCW 9A.82.050(1))

Securities Act violation (RCW 21.20.400)

Tampering with a Witness (RCW 9A.72.120)

Telephone Harassment (subsequent conviction or threat of death) (RCW 9.61.230)

Theft of Livestock 2 (RCW 9A.56.080)

Unlawful Imprisonment (RCW 9A.40.040)

Unlawful possession of firearm in the second degree (RCW 9.41.040(1)(b))

Unlawful Use of Building for Drug Purposes (RCW 69.53.010)

Willful Failure to Return from Work Release (RCW 72.65.070)

 

IIComputer Trespass 1 (RCW 9A.52.110)

           Counterfeiting (RCW 9.16.035(3))

    Create, deliver, or possess a counterfeit controlled substance (RCW 69.50.401(b))

    Escape from Community Custody (RCW 72.09.310)

    Health Care False Claims (RCW 48.80.030)

    Malicious Mischief 1 (RCW 9A.48.070)

    Possession of controlled substance that is either heroin or narcotics from Schedule I or II or flunitrazepam from Schedule IV (RCW 69.50.401(d))

    Possession of phencyclidine (PCP) (RCW 69.50.401(d))

    Possession of Stolen Property 1 (RCW 9A.56.150)

    Theft 1 (RCW 9A.56.030)

    Theft of Rental, Leased, or Lease-purchased Property (valued at one thousand five hundred dollars or more) (RCW 9A.56.096(4))

    Trafficking in Insurance Claims (RCW 48.30A.015)

    Unlawful Practice of Law (RCW 2.48.180)

    Unlicensed Practice of a Profession or Business (RCW 18.130.190(7))

 

IAttempting to Elude a Pursuing Police Vehicle (RCW 46.61.024)

False Verification for Welfare (RCW 74.08.055)

Forged Prescription (RCW 69.41.020)

Forged Prescription for a Controlled Substance (RCW 69.50.403)

Forgery (RCW 9A.60.020)

Malicious Mischief 2 (RCW 9A.48.080)

Possess Controlled Substance that is a Narcotic from Schedule III, IV, or V or Non-narcotic from Schedule I-V (except phencyclidine or flunitrazepam) (RCW 69.50.401(d))

Possession of Stolen Property 2 (RCW 9A.56.160)

Reckless Burning 1 (RCW 9A.48.040)

Taking Motor Vehicle Without Permission (RCW 9A.56.070)

Theft 2 (RCW 9A.56.040)

Theft of Rental, Leased, or Lease-purchased Property (valued at two hundred fifty dollars or more but less than one thousand five hundred dollars) (RCW 9A.56.096(4))

Unlawful Issuance of Checks or Drafts (RCW 9A.56.060)

Unlawful Use of Food Stamps (RCW 9.91.140 (2) and (3))

Vehicle Prowl 1 (RCW 9A.52.095)

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 9.94A.440 and 2000 c 119 s 28 and 2000 c 28 s 17 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

    (1) Decision not to prosecute.

    STANDARD:  A prosecuting attorney may decline to prosecute, even though technically sufficient evidence to prosecute exists, in situations where prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question or would result in decreased respect for the law.

    GUIDELINE/COMMENTARY:

    Examples

    The following are examples of reasons not to prosecute which could satisfy the standard.

    (a) Contrary to Legislative Intent - It may be proper to decline to charge where the application of criminal sanctions would be clearly contrary to the intent of the legislature in enacting the particular statute.

    (b) Antiquated Statute - It may be proper to decline to charge where the statute in question is antiquated in that:

    (i) It has not been enforced for many years; and

    (ii) Most members of society act as if it were no longer in existence; and

    (iii) It serves no deterrent or protective purpose in today's society; and

    (iv) The statute has not been recently reconsidered by the legislature.

    This reason is not to be construed as the basis for declining cases because the law in question is unpopular or because it is difficult to enforce.

    (c) De Minimus Violation - It may be proper to decline to charge where the violation of law is only technical or insubstantial and where no public interest or deterrent purpose would be served by prosecution.

    (d) Confinement on Other Charges - It may be proper to decline to charge because the accused has been sentenced on another charge to a lengthy period of confinement; and

    (i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;

    (ii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and

    (iii) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.

    (e) Pending Conviction on Another Charge - It may be proper to decline to charge because the accused is facing a pending prosecution in the same or another county; and

    (i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;

    (ii) Conviction in the pending prosecution is imminent;

    (iii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and

    (iv) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.

    (f) High Disproportionate Cost of Prosecution - It may be proper to decline to charge where the cost of locating or transporting, or the burden on, prosecution witnesses is highly disproportionate to the importance of prosecuting the offense in question.  This reason should be limited to minor cases and should not be relied upon in serious cases.

    (g) Improper Motives of Complainant - It may be proper to decline charges because the motives of the complainant are improper and prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question or would result in decreased respect for the law.

    (h) Immunity - It may be proper to decline to charge where immunity is to be given to an accused in order to prosecute another where the accused's information or testimony will reasonably lead to the conviction of others who are responsible for more serious criminal conduct or who represent a greater danger to the public interest.

    (i) Victim Request - It may be proper to decline to charge because the victim requests that no criminal charges be filed and the case involves the following crimes or situations:

    (i) Assault cases where the victim has suffered little or no injury;

    (ii) Crimes against property, not involving violence, where no major loss was suffered;

    (iii) Where doing so would not jeopardize the safety of society.

    Care should be taken to insure that the victim's request is freely made and is not the product of threats or pressure by the accused.

    The presence of these factors may also justify the decision to dismiss a prosecution which has been commenced.

    Notification

    The prosecutor is encouraged to notify the victim, when practical, and the law enforcement personnel, of the decision not to prosecute.

    (2) Decision to prosecute.

    (a) STANDARD:

    Crimes against persons will be filed if sufficient admissible evidence exists, which, when considered with the most plausible, reasonably foreseeable defense that could be raised under the evidence, would justify conviction by a reasonable and objective fact-finder.  With regard to offenses prohibited by RCW 9A.44.040, 9A.44.050, 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, 9A.44.079, 9A.44.083, 9A.44.086, 9A.44.089, and 9A.64.020 the prosecutor should avoid prefiling agreements or diversions intended to place the accused in a program of treatment or counseling, so that treatment, if determined to be beneficial, can be provided pursuant to RCW 9.94A.670.

    Crimes against property/other crimes will be filed if the admissible evidence is of such convincing force as to make it probable that a reasonable and objective fact-finder would convict after hearing all the admissible evidence and the most plausible defense that could be raised.

    See table below for the crimes within these categories.

 

        CATEGORIZATION OF CRIMES FOR PROSECUTING STANDARDS

 

    CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS

    ((Aggravated Murder))

    1st Degree Murder

    2nd Degree Murder

    1st Degree Manslaughter

    2nd Degree Manslaughter

    1st Degree Kidnapping

    2nd Degree Kidnapping

    1st Degree Assault

    2nd Degree Assault

    3rd Degree Assault

    1st Degree Assault of a Child

    2nd Degree Assault of a Child

    3rd Degree Assault of a Child

    1st Degree Rape

    2nd Degree Rape

    3rd Degree Rape

    1st Degree Rape of a Child

    2nd Degree Rape of a Child

    3rd Degree Rape of a Child

    1st Degree Robbery

    2nd Degree Robbery

    1st Degree Arson

    1st Degree Burglary

    1st Degree Extortion

    2nd Degree Extortion

    Indecent Liberties

    Incest

    Vehicular Homicide

    Vehicular Assault

    1st Degree Child Molestation

    2nd Degree Child Molestation

    3rd Degree Child Molestation

    1st Degree Promoting Prostitution

    Intimidating a Juror

    Communication with a Minor

    Intimidating a Witness

    Intimidating a Public Servant

    Bomb Threat (if against person)

    Unlawful Imprisonment

    Promoting a Suicide Attempt

    Riot (if against person)

    Stalking

    Custodial Assault

    Domestic Violence Court Order Violation (RCW 10.99.040, 10.99.050, 26.09.300, 26.10.220, 26.26.138, 26.50.110, 26.52.070, or 74.34.145)

    Counterfeiting (if a violation of RCW 9.16.035(4))

 

    CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY/OTHER CRIMES

    2nd Degree Arson

    1st Degree Escape

    2nd Degree Escape

    2nd Degree Burglary

    1st Degree Theft

    2nd Degree Theft

    1st Degree Perjury

    2nd Degree Perjury

    1st Degree Introducing Contraband

    2nd Degree Introducing Contraband

    1st Degree Possession of Stolen Property

    2nd Degree Possession of Stolen Property

    Bribery

    Bribing a Witness

    Bribe received by a Witness

    Bomb Threat (if against property)

    1st Degree Malicious Mischief

    2nd Degree Malicious Mischief

    1st Degree Reckless Burning

    Taking a Motor Vehicle without Authorization

    Forgery

    2nd Degree Promoting Prostitution

    Tampering with a Witness

    Trading in Public Office

    Trading in Special Influence

    Receiving/Granting Unlawful Compensation

    Bigamy

    Eluding a Pursuing Police Vehicle

    Willful Failure to Return from Furlough

    Escape from Community Custody

    Riot (if against property)

    1st Degree Theft of Livestock

    2nd Degree Theft of Livestock

 

    ALL OTHER UNCLASSIFIED FELONIES

    Selection of Charges/Degree of Charge

    (i) The prosecutor should file charges which adequately describe the nature of defendant's conduct.  Other offenses may be charged only if they are necessary to ensure that the charges:

    (A) Will significantly enhance the strength of the state's case at trial; or

    (B) Will result in restitution to all victims.

    (ii) The prosecutor should not overcharge to obtain a guilty plea.  Overcharging includes:

    (A) Charging a higher degree;

    (B) Charging additional counts.

    This standard is intended to direct prosecutors to charge those crimes which demonstrate the nature and seriousness of a defendant's criminal conduct, but to decline to charge crimes which are not necessary to such an indication.  Crimes which do not merge as a matter of law, but which arise from the same course of conduct, do not all have to be charged.

 

    (b) GUIDELINES/COMMENTARY:

    (i) Police Investigation

    A prosecuting attorney is dependent upon law enforcement agencies to conduct the necessary factual investigation which must precede the decision to prosecute.  The prosecuting attorney shall ensure that a thorough factual investigation has been conducted before a decision to prosecute is made.  In ordinary circumstances the investigation should include the following:

    (A) The interviewing of all material witnesses, together with the obtaining of written statements whenever possible;

    (B) The completion of necessary laboratory tests; and

    (C) The obtaining, in accordance with constitutional requirements, of the suspect's version of the events.

    If the initial investigation is incomplete, a prosecuting attorney should insist upon further investigation before a decision to prosecute is made, and specify what the investigation needs to include.

    (ii) Exceptions

    In certain situations, a prosecuting attorney may authorize filing of a criminal complaint before the investigation is complete if:

    (A) Probable cause exists to believe the suspect is guilty; and

    (B) The suspect presents a danger to the community or is likely to flee if not apprehended; or

    (C) The arrest of the suspect is necessary to complete the investigation of the crime.

    In the event that the exception to the standard is applied, the prosecuting attorney shall obtain a commitment from the law enforcement agency involved to complete the investigation in a timely manner.  If the subsequent investigation does not produce sufficient evidence to meet the normal charging standard, the complaint should be dismissed.

    (iii) Investigation Techniques

    The prosecutor should be fully advised of the investigatory techniques that were used in the case investigation including:

    (A) Polygraph testing;

    (B) Hypnosis;

    (C) Electronic surveillance;

    (D) Use of informants.

    (iv) Pre-Filing Discussions with Defendant

    Discussions with the defendant or his/her representative regarding the selection or disposition of charges may occur prior to the filing of charges, and potential agreements can be reached.

    (v) Pre-Filing Discussions with Victim(s)

    Discussions with the victim(s) or victims' representatives regarding the selection or disposition of charges may occur before the filing of charges.  The discussions may be considered by the prosecutor in charging and disposition decisions, and should be considered before reaching any agreement with the defendant regarding these decisions.

 

    Sec. 5.  RCW 9.94A.560 and 2000 c 28 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

    Notwithstanding the statutory maximum sentence or any other provision of this chapter, a persistent offender shall be sentenced to a term of total confinement for life without the possibility of release or, when authorized by RCW 10.95.030 for the crime of ((aggravated)) murder in the first degree, sentenced to death.  In addition, no offender subject to this section may be eligible for community custody, earned release time, furlough, home detention, partial confinement, work crew, work release, or any other form of release as defined under RCW 9.94A.150 (1), (2), (3), (4), (6), (8), or (9), or any other form of authorized leave from a correctional facility while not in the direct custody of a corrections officer or officers, except:  (1) In the case of an offender in need of emergency medical treatment; or (2) for the purpose of commitment to an inpatient treatment facility in the case of an offender convicted of the crime of rape in the first degree.

 

    Sec. 6.  RCW 10.95.030 and 1993 c 479 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, any person convicted of the crime of ((aggravated)) first degree murder shall be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release or parole.  A person sentenced to life imprisonment under this section shall not have that sentence suspended, deferred, or commuted by any judicial officer and the indeterminate sentence review board or its successor may not parole such prisoner nor reduce the period of confinement in any manner whatsoever including but not limited to any sort of good‑time calculation.  The department of social and health services or its successor or any executive official may not permit such prisoner to participate in any sort of release or furlough program.

    (2) If, pursuant to a special sentencing proceeding held under RCW 10.95.050, the trier of fact finds that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency, the sentence shall be death.  In no case, however, shall a person be sentenced to death if the person was mentally retarded at the time the crime was committed, under the definition of mental retardation set forth in (a) of this subsection.  A diagnosis of mental retardation shall be documented by a licensed psychiatrist or licensed psychologist designated by the court, who is an expert in the diagnosis and evaluation of mental retardation.  The defense must establish mental retardation by a preponderance of the evidence and the court must make a finding as to the existence of mental retardation.

    (a) "Mentally retarded" means the individual has:  (i) Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning; (ii) existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior; and (iii) both significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning and deficits in adaptive behavior were manifested during the developmental period.

    (b) "General intellectual functioning" means the results obtained by assessment with one or more of the individually administered general intelligence tests developed for the purpose of assessing intellectual functioning.

    (c) "Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning" means intelligence quotient seventy or below.

    (d) "Adaptive behavior" means the effectiveness or degree with which individuals meet the standards of personal independence and social responsibility expected for his or her age.

    (e) "Developmental period" means the period of time between conception and the eighteenth birthday.

 

    Sec. 7.  RCW 10.95.050 and 1981 c 138 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) If a defendant is adjudicated guilty of ((aggravated)) first degree murder, whether by acceptance of a plea of guilty, by verdict of a jury, or by decision of the trial court sitting without a jury, a special sentencing proceeding shall be held ((if a notice of special sentencing proceeding was filed and served as provided by RCW 10.95.040)).  No sort of plea, admission, or agreement may abrogate the requirement that a special sentencing proceeding be held.

    (2) A jury shall decide the matters presented in the special sentencing proceeding unless a jury is waived in the discretion of the court and with the consent of the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.

    (3) If the defendant's guilt was determined by a jury verdict, the trial court shall reconvene the same jury to hear the special sentencing proceeding.  The proceeding shall commence as soon as practicable after completion of the trial at which the defendant's guilt was determined.  If, however, unforeseen circumstances make it impracticable to reconvene the same jury to hear the special sentencing proceeding, the trial court may dismiss that jury and convene a jury pursuant to subsection (4) of this section.

    (4) If the defendant's guilt was determined by plea of guilty or by decision of the trial court sitting without a jury, or if a retrial of the special sentencing proceeding is necessary for any reason including but not limited to a mistrial in a previous special sentencing proceeding or as a consequence of a remand from an appellate court, the trial court shall impanel a jury of twelve persons plus whatever alternate jurors the trial court deems necessary.  The defense and prosecution shall each be allowed to peremptorily challenge twelve jurors.  If there is more than one defendant, each defendant shall be allowed an additional peremptory challenge and the prosecution shall be allowed a like number of additional challenges.  If alternate jurors are selected, the defense and prosecution shall each be allowed one peremptory challenge for each alternate juror to be selected and if there is more than one defendant each defendant shall be allowed an additional peremptory challenge for each alternate juror to be selected and the prosecution shall be allowed a like number of additional challenges.

 

    Sec. 8.  RCW 10.95.060 and 1981 c 138 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) At the commencement of the special sentencing proceeding, the trial court shall instruct the jury as to the nature and purpose of the proceeding and as to the consequences of its decision, as provided in RCW 10.95.030.

    (2) At the special sentencing proceeding both the prosecution and defense shall be allowed to make an opening statement.  The prosecution shall first present evidence and then the defense may present evidence.  Rebuttal evidence may be presented by each side.  Upon conclusion of the evidence, the court shall instruct the jury and then the prosecution and defense shall be permitted to present argument.  The prosecution shall open and conclude the argument.

    (3) The court shall admit any relevant evidence which it deems to have probative value regardless of its admissibility under the rules of evidence, including hearsay evidence and evidence of the defendant's previous criminal activity regardless of whether the defendant has been charged or convicted as a result of such activity.  The defendant shall be accorded a fair opportunity to rebut or offer any hearsay evidence.

    In addition to evidence of whether or not there are sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency, if the jury sitting in the special sentencing proceeding has not heard evidence of the ((aggravated)) first degree murder of which the defendant stands convicted, both the defense and prosecution may introduce evidence concerning the facts and circumstances of the murder.

    (4) Upon conclusion of the evidence and argument at the special sentencing proceeding, the jury shall retire to deliberate upon the following question:  "Having in mind the crime of which the defendant has been found guilty, are you convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency?"

    In order to return an affirmative answer to the question posed by this subsection, the jury must so find unanimously.

 

    Sec. 9.  RCW 10.95.090 and 1981 c 138 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

    If any sentence of death imposed pursuant to this chapter is commuted by the governor, or held to be invalid by a final judgment of a court after all avenues of appeal have been exhausted by the parties to the action, or if the death penalty established by this chapter is held to be invalid by a final judgment of a court which is binding on all courts in the state, the sentence for ((aggravated)) first degree murder if there was an affirmative response to the question posed by RCW 10.95.060(4) shall be life imprisonment as provided in RCW 10.95.030(1).

 

    Sec. 10.  RCW 10.95.120 and 1981 c 138 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:

    In all cases in which a person is convicted of ((aggravated)) first degree murder, the trial court shall, within thirty days after the entry of the judgment and sentence, submit a report to the clerk of the supreme court of Washington, to the defendant or his or her attorney, and to the prosecuting attorney which provides the information specified under subsections (1) through (8) of this section.  The report shall be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the supreme court of Washington and shall include the following:

    (1) Information about the defendant, including the following:

    (a) Name, date of birth, gender, marital status, and race and/or ethnic origin;

    (b) Number and ages of children;

    (c) Whether his or her parents are living, and date of death where applicable;

    (d) Number of children born to his or her parents;

    (e) The defendant's educational background, intelligence level, and intelligence quotient;

    (f) Whether a psychiatric evaluation was performed, and if so, whether it indicated that the defendant was:

    (i) Able to distinguish right from wrong;

    (ii) Able to perceive the nature and quality of his or her act; and

    (iii) Able to cooperate intelligently with his or her defense;

    (g) Any character or behavior disorders found or other pertinent psychiatric or psychological information;

    (h) The work record of the defendant;

    (i) A list of the defendant's prior convictions including the offense, date, and sentence imposed; and

    (j) The length of time the defendant has resided in Washington and the county in which he or she was convicted.

    (2) Information about the trial, including:

    (a) The defendant's plea;

    (b) Whether defendant was represented by counsel;

    (c) Whether there was evidence introduced or instructions given as to defenses to ((aggravated)) first degree murder, including excusable homicide, justifiable homicide, insanity, duress, entrapment, alibi, intoxication, or other specific defense;

    (d) Any other offenses charged against the defendant and tried at the same trial and whether they resulted in conviction; and

    (e) ((What aggravating circumstances were alleged against the defendant and which of these circumstances was found to have been applicable; and

    (f))) Names and charges filed against other defendant(s) if tried jointly and disposition of the charges.

    (3) Information concerning the special sentencing proceeding, including:

    (a) The date the defendant was convicted and date the special sentencing proceeding commenced;

    (b) Whether the jury for the special sentencing proceeding was the same jury that returned the guilty verdict, providing an explanation if it was not;

    (c) Whether there was evidence of mitigating circumstances;

    (d) Whether there was, in the court's opinion, credible evidence of the mitigating circumstances as provided in RCW 10.95.070;

    (e) The jury's answer to the question posed in RCW 10.95.060(4);

    (f) The sentence imposed.

    (4) Information about the victim, including:

    (a) Whether he or she was related to the defendant by blood or marriage;

    (b) The victim's occupation and whether he or she was an employer or employee of the defendant;

    (c) Whether the victim was acquainted with the defendant, and if so, how well;

    (d) The length of time the victim resided in Washington and the county;

    (e) Whether the victim was the same race and/or ethnic origin as the defendant;

    (f) Whether the victim was the same sex as the defendant;

    (g) Whether the victim was held hostage during the crime and if so, how long;

    (h) The nature and extent of any physical harm or torture inflicted upon the victim prior to death;

    (i) The victim's age; and

    (j) The type of weapon used in the crime, if any.

    (5) Information about the representation of the defendant, including:

    (a) Date counsel secured;

    (b) Whether counsel was retained or appointed, including the reason for appointment;

    (c) The length of time counsel has practiced law and nature of his or her practice; and

    (d) Whether the same counsel served at both the trial and special sentencing proceeding, and if not, why not.

    (6) General considerations, including:

    (a) Whether the race and/or ethnic origin of the defendant, victim, or any witness was an apparent factor at trial;

    (b) What percentage of the county population is the same race and/or ethnic origin of the defendant;

    (c) Whether members of the defendant's or victim's race and/or ethnic origin were represented on the jury;

    (d) Whether there was evidence that such members were systematically excluded from the jury;

    (e) Whether the sexual orientation of the defendant, victim, or any witness was a factor in the trial;

    (f) Whether any specific instruction was given to the jury to exclude race, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation as an issue;

    (g) Whether there was extensive publicity concerning the case in the community;

    (h) Whether the jury was instructed to disregard such publicity;

    (i) Whether the jury was instructed to avoid any influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor when considering its verdict or its findings in the special sentencing proceeding;

    (j) The nature of the evidence resulting in such instruction; and

    (k) General comments of the trial judge concerning the appropriateness of the sentence considering the crime, defendant, and other relevant factors.

    (7) Information about the chronology of the case, including the date that:

    (a) The defendant was arrested;

    (b) Trial began;

    (c) The verdict was returned;

    (d) Post-trial motions were ruled on;

    (e) Special sentencing proceeding began;

    (f) Sentence was imposed;

    (g) Trial judge's report was completed; and

    (h) Trial judge's report was filed.

    (8) The trial judge shall sign and date the questionnaire when it is completed.

 

    Sec. 11.  RCW 43.43.830 and 1999 c 45 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout RCW 43.43.830 through 43.43.840.

    (1) "Applicant" means:

    (a) Any prospective employee who will or may have unsupervised access to children under sixteen years of age or developmentally disabled persons or vulnerable adults during the course of his or her employment or involvement with the business or organization;

    (b) Any prospective volunteer who will have regularly scheduled unsupervised access to children under sixteen years of age, developmentally disabled persons, or vulnerable adults during the course of his or her employment or involvement with the business or organization under circumstances where such access will or may involve groups of (i) five or fewer children under twelve years of age, (ii) three or fewer children between twelve and sixteen years of age, (iii) developmentally disabled persons, or (iv) vulnerable adults; or

    (c) Any prospective adoptive parent, as defined in RCW 26.33.020.

    (2) "Business or organization" means a business or organization licensed in this state, any agency of the state, or other governmental entity, that educates, trains, treats, supervises, houses, or provides recreation to developmentally disabled persons, vulnerable adults, or children under sixteen years of age, including but not limited to public housing authorities, school districts, and educational service districts.

    (3) "Civil adjudication" means a specific court finding of sexual abuse or exploitation or physical abuse in a dependency action under RCW 13.34.040 or in a domestic relations action under Title 26 RCW.  In the case of vulnerable adults, civil adjudication means a specific court finding of abuse or financial exploitation in a protection proceeding under chapter 74.34 RCW.  It does not include administrative proceedings.  The term "civil adjudication" is further limited to court findings that identify as the perpetrator of the abuse a named individual, over the age of eighteen years, who was a party to the dependency or dissolution proceeding or was a respondent in a protection proceeding in which the finding was made and who contested the allegation of abuse or exploitation.

    (4) "Conviction record" means "conviction record" information as defined in RCW 10.97.030(3) relating to a crime against children or other persons committed by either an adult or a juvenile.  It does not include a conviction for an offense that has been the subject of an expungement, pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of the rehabilitation of the person convicted, or a conviction that has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.  It does include convictions for offenses for which the defendant received a deferred or suspended sentence, unless the record has been expunged according to law.

    (5) "Crime against children or other persons" means a conviction of any of the following offenses:  ((Aggravated murder;)) First or second degree murder; first or second degree kidnaping; first, second, or third degree assault; first, second, or third degree assault of a child; first, second, or third degree rape; first, second, or third degree rape of a child; first or second degree robbery; first degree arson; first degree burglary; first or second degree manslaughter; first or second degree extortion; indecent liberties; incest; vehicular homicide; first degree promoting prostitution; communication with a minor; unlawful imprisonment; simple assault; sexual exploitation of minors; first or second degree criminal mistreatment; child abuse or neglect as defined in RCW 26.44.020; first or second degree custodial interference; first or second degree custodial sexual misconduct; malicious harassment; first, second, or third degree child molestation; first or second degree sexual misconduct with a minor; patronizing a juvenile prostitute; child abandonment; promoting pornography; selling or distributing erotic material to a minor; custodial assault; violation of child abuse restraining order; child buying or selling; prostitution; felony indecent exposure; criminal abandonment; or any of these crimes as they may be renamed in the future.

    (6) "Crimes relating to drugs" means a conviction of a crime to manufacture, delivery, or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance.

    (7) "Crimes relating to financial exploitation" means a conviction for first, second, or third degree extortion; first, second, or third degree theft; first or second degree robbery; forgery; or any of these crimes as they may be renamed in the future.

    (8) "Disciplinary board final decision" means any final decision issued by a disciplining authority under chapter 18.130 RCW or the secretary of the department of health for the following businesses or professions:

    (a) Chiropractic;

    (b) Dentistry;

    (c) Dental hygiene;

    (d) Massage;

    (e) Midwifery;

    (f) Naturopathy;

    (g) Osteopathic medicine and surgery;

    (h) Physical therapy;

    (i) Physicians;

    (j) Practical nursing;

    (k) Registered nursing; and

    (l) Psychology.

    "Disciplinary board final decision," for real estate brokers and salespersons, means any final decision issued by the director of the department of licensing for real estate brokers and salespersons.

    (9) "Unsupervised" means not in the presence of:

    (a) Another employee or volunteer from the same business or organization as the applicant; or

    (b) Any relative or guardian of any of the children or developmentally disabled persons or vulnerable adults to which the applicant has access during the course of his or her employment or involvement with the business or organization.

    (10) "Vulnerable adult" means "vulnerable adult" as defined in chapter 74.34 RCW, except that for the purposes of requesting and receiving background checks pursuant to RCW 43.43.832, it shall also include adults of any age who lack the functional, mental, or physical ability to care for themselves.

    (11) "Financial exploitation" means the illegal or improper use of a vulnerable adult or that adult's resources for another person's profit or advantage.

    (12) "Agency" means any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, or facility which receives, provides services to, houses or otherwise cares for vulnerable adults.

 

    Sec. 12.  RCW 43.330.190 and 1999 c 303 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    Counties may submit a petition for relief to the office of public defense for reimbursement of extraordinary criminal justice costs.  Extraordinary criminal justice costs are defined as those associated with investigation, prosecution, indigent defense, jury impanelment, expert witnesses, interpreters, incarceration, and other adjudication costs of ((aggravated)) murder cases.

    (1) The office of public defense, in consultation with the Washington association of prosecuting attorneys and the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, shall develop procedures for processing the petitions, for auditing the veracity of the petitions, and for prioritizing the petitions.  Prioritization of the petitions shall be based on, but not limited to, such factors as disproportionate fiscal impact relative to the county budget, efficient use of resources, and whether the costs are extraordinary and could not be reasonably accommodated and anticipated in the normal budget process.

    (2) Before January 1st of each year, the office of public defense, in consultation with the Washington association of prosecuting attorneys and the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, shall develop and submit to the appropriate fiscal committees of the senate and house of representatives a prioritized list of submitted petitions that are recommended for funding by the legislature.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13.  The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:

    (1) RCW 10.95.020 (Definition) and 1998 c 305 s 1; and

    (2) RCW 10.95.040 (Special sentencing proceeding--Notice--Filing--Service) and 1981 c 138 s 4.

 


                            --- END ---