S-0139.1  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 5198

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By Senators B. Sheldon, Winsley, Prentice, Gardner, Thibaudeau, Oke, T. Sheldon, Regala, Haugen, Rasmussen, Kohl‑Welles, Fraser, Costa, Jacobsen and Franklin

 

Read first time 01/15/2001.  Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce & Financial Institutions.

Preventing employees who commit criminal acts from requalifying for unemployment insurance.


    AN ACT Relating to the denial of unemployment insurance benefits due to criminal acts of the employee; and amending RCW 50.04.293 and 50.20.060.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 50.04.293 and 1993 c 483 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    "Misconduct" means an employee's act or failure to act in willful disregard of his or her employer's interest where the effect of the employee's act or failure to act is to harm the employer's business.  Any criminal act conducted by the employee at or involving the employer's business is an act in willful disregard of the employer's interest.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 50.20.060 and 2000 c 2 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

    An individual shall be disqualified from benefits beginning with the first day of the calendar week in which he or she has been discharged or suspended for misconduct connected with his or her work and thereafter for seven calendar weeks and until he or she has obtained bona fide work in employment covered by this title and earned wages in that employment equal to seven times his or her weekly benefit amount.  However, when the employer has a reasonable, good faith belief that the individual's misconduct constituted a criminal act at or involving the employer's business, the individual may not requalify for benefits under this section for one calendar year from the first day of the calendar week in which he or she has been discharged or suspended for misconduct connected with his or her work.  Alcoholism shall not constitute a defense to disqualification from benefits due to misconduct.

 


                            --- END ---