S-1385.1  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 5915

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By Senators Patterson and Regala

 

Read first time 02/07/2001.  Referred to Committee on Environment, Energy & Water.

Selecting wetlands mitigation projects.


    AN ACT Relating to wetlands mitigation projects; amending RCW 90.82.070; adding a new section to chapter 90.74 RCW; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that recent studies indicate that the major reason for the failure of wetlands mitigation projects is due to a design that is inappropriate to the hydrology of the site selected.

    The legislature intends that this act improve the scientific basis for making decisions in site selection for wetlands mitigation projects.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 90.82.070 and 1998 c 247 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    Watershed planning under this chapter shall address water quantity in the management area by undertaking an assessment of water supply and use in the management area and developing strategies for future use.

    (1) The assessment shall include:

    (a) An estimate of the surface and ground water present in the management area;

    (b) An estimate of the surface and ground water available in the management area, taking into account seasonal and other variations;

    (c) An estimate of the water in the management area represented by claims in the water rights claims registry, water use permits, certificated rights, existing minimum instream flow rules, federally reserved rights, and any other rights to water;

    (d) An estimate of the surface and ground water actually being used in the management area;

    (e) An estimate of the water needed in the future for use in the management area;

    (f) An identification of the location of areas where aquifers are known to recharge surface bodies of water and areas known to provide for the recharge of aquifers from the surface; and

    (g) An estimate of the surface and ground water available for further appropriation, taking into account the minimum instream flows adopted by rule or to be adopted by rule under this chapter for streams in the management area including the data necessary to evaluate necessary flows for fish.

    (2) Strategies for increasing water supplies in the management area, which may include, but are not limited to, increasing water supplies through water conservation, water reuse, the use of reclaimed water, voluntary water transfers, aquifer recharge and recovery, additional water allocations, or additional water storage and water storage enhancements.  The objective of these strategies is to supply water in sufficient quantities to satisfy the minimum instream flows for fish and to provide water for future out-of-stream uses for water identified in subsection (1)(e) and (g) of this section and to ensure that adequate water supplies are available for agriculture, energy production, and population and economic growth under the requirements of the state's growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW.  These strategies, in and of themselves, shall not be construed to confer new water rights.  The watershed plan must address the strategies required under this subsection.

    (3) The assessment may include an identification of the location of areas where wetlands exist, areas that provide the potential for wetlands restoration, and areas with potential for use in wetlands mitigation projects.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 90.74 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) Regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands compensatory mitigation projects must evaluate the adequacy of hydrological information presented by a project proponent to determine the likelihood of success of the project.

    (2) The agency may require a hydrological assessment of the site.

    (3) The hydrological assessment must be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate that the mitigation site will attain a hydrologic regime to meet the goals presented in the proponent's compensatory mitigation project.

    (4) If a proposed wetlands compensation project targets specific functions, the hydrological assessment must demonstrate that the site will achieve a hydrologic regime needed to develop and support these functions.

 


                            --- END ---