S‑0342.1   _____________________________________________

 

SENATE BILL 5916

 

           _____________________________________________

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By Senators Parlette, Haugen, B. Sheldon, Oke, T. Sheldon, Morton, Hewitt and Kohl‑Welles

 

Read first time 02/07/2001.  Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

_1      AN ACT Relating to vehicular offenses within roadway

_2  construction zones; and amending RCW 9.94A.390.

     

_3  BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

     

_4      Sec. 1.  RCW 9.94A.390 and 2000 c 28 s 8 are each amended to read

_5  as follows:

_6      The court may impose a sentence outside the standard sentence

_7  range for an offense if it finds, considering the purpose of this

_8  chapter, that there are substantial and compelling reasons

_9  justifying an exceptional sentence.  Whenever a sentence outside

10  the standard sentence range is imposed, the court shall set forth

11  the reasons for its decision in written findings of fact and

12  conclusions of law.  A sentence outside the standard sentence

13  range shall be a determinate sentence.

14      If the sentencing court finds that an exceptional sentence

15  outside the standard sentence range should be imposed, the

16  sentence is subject to review only as provided for in RCW

17  9.94A.210(4).

18      A departure from the standards in RCW 9.94A.400 (1) and (2)

19  governing whether sentences are to be served consecutively or

                               p. 1                       SB 5916

_1  concurrently is an exceptional sentence subject to the limitations

_2  in this section, and may be appealed by the offender or the state

_3  as set forth in RCW 9.94A.210 (2) through (6).

_4      The following are illustrative factors which the court may

_5  consider in the exercise of its discretion to impose an

_6  exceptional sentence.  The following are illustrative only and are

_7  not intended to be exclusive reasons for exceptional sentences.

_8      (1) Mitigating Circumstances

_9      (a) To a significant degree, the victim was an initiator,

10  willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident.

11      (b) Before detection, the defendant compensated, or made a good

12  faith effort to compensate, the victim of the criminal conduct for

13  any damage or injury sustained.

14      (c) The defendant committed the crime under duress, coercion,

15  threat, or compulsion insufficient to constitute a complete

16  defense but which significantly affected his or her conduct.

17      (d) The defendant, with no apparent predisposition to do so,

18  was induced by others to participate in the crime.

19      (e) The defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of

20  his or her conduct, or to conform his or her conduct to the

21  requirements of the law, was significantly impaired.  Voluntary

22  use of drugs or alcohol is excluded.

23      (f) The offense was principally accomplished by another person

24  and the defendant manifested extreme caution or sincere concern

25  for the safety or well-being of the victim.

26      (g) The operation of the multiple offense policy of RCW

27  9.94A.400 results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly

28  excessive in light of the purpose of this chapter, as expressed in

29  RCW 9.94A.010.

30      (h) The defendant or the defendant's children suffered a

31  continuing pattern of physical or sexual abuse by the victim of

32  the offense and the offense is a response to that abuse.

33      (2) Aggravating Circumstances

34      (a) The defendant's conduct during the commission of the

35  current offense manifested deliberate cruelty to the victim.

36      (b) The defendant knew or should have known that the victim of

37  the current offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of

SB 5916                        p. 2

_1  resistance due to extreme youth, advanced age, disability, or ill

_2  health.

_3      (c) The current offense was a violent offense, and the

_4  defendant knew that the victim of the current offense was

_5  pregnant.

_6      (d) The current offense was a major economic offense or series

_7  of offenses, so identified by a consideration of any of the

_8  following factors:

_9      (i) The current offense involved multiple victims or multiple

10  incidents per victim;

11      (ii) The current offense involved attempted or actual monetary

12  loss substantially greater than typical for the offense;

13      (iii) The current offense involved a high degree of

14  sophistication or planning or occurred over a lengthy period of

15  time; or

16      (iv) The defendant used his or her position of trust,

17  confidence, or fiduciary responsibility to facilitate the

18  commission of the current offense.

19      (e) The current offense was a major violation of the Uniform

20  Controlled Substances Act, chapter 69.50 RCW (VUCSA), related to

21  trafficking in controlled substances, which was more onerous than

22  the typical offense of its statutory definition:  The presence of

23  ANY of the following may identify a current offense as a major

24  VUCSA:

25      (i) The current offense involved at least three separate

26  transactions in which controlled substances were sold,

27  transferred, or possessed with intent to do so;

28      (ii) The current offense involved an attempted or actual sale

29  or transfer of controlled substances in quantities substantially

30  larger than for personal use;

31      (iii) The current offense involved the manufacture of

32  controlled substances for use by other parties;

33      (iv) The circumstances of the current offense reveal the

34  offender to have occupied a high position in the drug distribution

35  hierarchy;

36      (v) The current offense involved a high degree of

37  sophistication or planning, occurred over a lengthy period of

38  time, or involved a broad geographic area of disbursement; or

                               p. 3                       SB 5916

 

_1      (vi) The offender used his or her position or status to

_2  facilitate the commission of the current offense, including

_3  positions of trust, confidence or fiduciary responsibility (e.g.,

_4  pharmacist, physician, or other medical professional).

_5      (f) The current offense included a finding of sexual motivation

_6  pursuant to RCW 9.94A.127.

_7      (g) The offense was part of an ongoing pattern of sexual abuse

_8  of the same victim under the age of eighteen years manifested by

_9  multiple incidents over a prolonged period of time.

10      (h) The current offense involved domestic violence, as defined

11  in RCW 10.99.020, and one or more of the following was present:

12      (i) The offense was part of an ongoing pattern of

13  psychological, physical, or sexual abuse of the victim manifested

14  by multiple incidents over a prolonged period of time;

15      (ii) The offense occurred within sight or sound of the victim's

16  or the offender's minor children under the age of eighteen years;

17  or

18      (iii) The offender's conduct during the commission of the

19  current offense manifested deliberate cruelty or intimidation of

20  the victim.

21      (i) The operation of the multiple offense policy of RCW

22  9.94A.400 results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly too

23  lenient in light of the purpose of this chapter, as expressed in

24  RCW 9.94A.010.

25      (j) The defendant's prior unscored misdemeanor or prior

26  unscored foreign criminal history results in a presumptive

27  sentence that is clearly too lenient in light of the purpose of

28  this chapter, as expressed in RCW 9.94A.010.

29      (k) The offense resulted in the pregnancy of a child victim of

30  rape.

31      (l) The defendant knew that the victim of the current offense

32  was a youth who was not residing with a legal custodian and the

33  defendant established or promoted the relationship for the primary

34  purpose of victimization.

35      (m) The current offense is a vehicular assault or vehicular

36  homicide and the person injured or killed was within a roadway

37  construction zone as defined in RCW 46.61.527.

 

‑‑‑ END ‑‑‑

SB 5916                        p. 4