S-3629.2  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 6717

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington   57th Legislature        2002 Regular Session

 

By Senators Fraser and Morton

 

Read first time 01/28/2002.  Referred to Committee on Environment, Energy & Water.

Clarifying amendatory language of chapter 237, Laws of 2001.


    AN ACT Relating to clarifying amendatory language of chapter 237, Laws of 2001; amending RCW 90.82.040, 90.82.085, and 90.03.380; and adding a new section to chapter 90.82 RCW.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 90.82 RCW to read as follows:

    The legislature reaffirms the intent of chapter 237, Laws of 2001 to meet the needs of fish and healthy watersheds statewide and the finding of chapter 237, Laws of 2001 that clarifying the authorities for instream flows is an important step to providing a better future for our state.  The legislature also reaffirms the policy enacted in chapter 90.22 RCW and RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) and 77.55.050 for state protection of instream flows.  By this act, the legislature intends to clarify amendatory language of chapter 237, Laws of 2001 to assure implementation of the intent and findings of that act.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 90.82.040 and 2001 c 237 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) Once a WRIA planning unit has been initiated under RCW 90.82.060 and a lead agency has been designated, it shall notify the department and may apply to the department for funding assistance for conducting the planning.  Funds shall be provided from and to the extent of appropriations made by the legislature to the department expressly for this purpose.

    (2)(a) Each planning unit that has complied with subsection (1) of this section is eligible to receive watershed planning grants in the following amounts for three phases of watershed planning:

    (i) Initiating governments may apply for an initial organizing grant of up to fifty thousand dollars for a single WRIA or up to seventy-five thousand dollars for a multi-WRIA management area in accordance with RCW 90.82.060(4);

    (ii)(A) A planning unit may apply for up to two hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA in the management area for conducting watershed assessments in accordance with RCW 90.82.070, except that a planning unit that chooses to conduct a detailed assessment or studies under (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection or whose initiating governments choose or have chosen to include an instream flow or water quality component in accordance with RCW 90.82.080 or 90.82.090 may apply for up to one hundred thousand additional dollars for each instream flow and up to one hundred thousand additional dollars for each water quality component included for each WRIA to conduct an assessment on that optional component and for each WRIA in which the assessments or studies under (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection are conducted.

    (B) A planning unit may elect to apply for up to one hundred thousand additional dollars to conduct a detailed assessment of multipurpose water storage opportunities or for studies of specific multipurpose storage projects which opportunities or projects are consistent with and support the other elements of the planning unit's watershed plan developed under this chapter; and

    (iii) A planning unit may apply for up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA in the management area for developing a watershed plan and making recommendations for actions by local, state, and federal agencies, tribes, private property owners, private organizations, and individual citizens, including a recommended list of strategies and projects that would further the purpose of the plan in accordance with RCW 90.82.060 through 90.82.100.

    (b) A planning unit may request a different amount for phase two or phase three of watershed planning than is specified in (a) of this subsection, provided that the total amount of funds awarded do not exceed the maximum amount the planning unit is eligible for under (a) of this subsection.  The department shall approve such an alternative allocation of funds if the planning unit identifies how the proposed alternative will meet the goals of this chapter and provides a ((proposed)) timeline for ((the completion of)) completing planning in accordance with RCW 90.82.130.  However, the up to one hundred thousand additional dollars in funding for instream flow and water quality components and for water storage assessments or studies that a planning unit may apply for under (a)(ii)(A) of this subsection may be used only for those instream flow, water quality, and water storage purposes.

    (c) By December 1, 2001, or within one year of initiating phase one of watershed planning, whichever occurs later, the initiating governments for each planning unit must inform the department whether they ((intend to have the planning unit establish or amend instream flows as part of its planning process)) choose to include an instream flow component in accordance with RCW 90.82.080.  If they ((elect to have the planning unit establish or amend instream flows)) choose to include an instream flow component in accordance with RCW 90.82.080, the planning unit is eligible to receive one hundred thousand dollars for that purpose in accordance with (a)(ii) of this subsection.  If the initiating governments for a planning unit ((elect not to establish or amend instream flows as part of the unit's planning process)) choose to include an instream flow component in accordance with RCW 90.82.080, the department shall retain one hundred thousand dollars to carry out an assessment to support establishment of instream flows and to establish such flows in accordance with RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) and chapter 90.22 RCW.  Except as provided in RCW 90.82.080, the department shall not use these funds to amend an existing instream flow unless requested to do so by the initiating governments for a planning unit.

    (d) In administering funds appropriated for supplemental funding for optional plan components under (a)(ii) of this subsection, the department shall give priority in granting the available funds to ((proposals for setting or amending)) instream flows components.

    (3)(a) The department shall use the eligibility criteria in this subsection (3) instead of rules, policies, or guidelines when evaluating grant applications at each stage of the grants program.

    (b) In reviewing grant applications under this subsection (3), the department shall evaluate whether:

    (i) The planning unit meets all of the requirements of this chapter;

    (ii) The application demonstrates a need for state planning funds to accomplish the objectives of the planning process; and

    (iii) The application and supporting information evidences a readiness to proceed.

    (c) In ranking grant applications submitted at each stage of the grants program, the department shall give preference to applications in the following order of priority:

    (i) Applications from existing planning groups that have been in existence for at least one year;

    (ii) Applications that address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic fish species listed or proposed to be listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth from:

    (A) First, multi-WRIA planning; and

    (B) Second, single WRIA planning;

    (iii) Applications that address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds or for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth from:

    (A) First, multi-WRIA planning; and

    (B) Second, single WRIA planning.

    (d) The department may not impose any local matching fund requirement as a condition for grant eligibility or as a preference for receiving a grant.

    (4) The department may retain up to one percent of funds allocated under this section to defray administrative costs.

    (5) Planning under this chapter should be completed as expeditiously as possible, with the focus being on local stakeholders cooperating to meet local needs.

    (6) Funding provided under this section shall be considered a contractual obligation against the moneys appropriated for this purpose.

 

    Sec. 3.  RCW 90.82.085 and 2001 c 237 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    By October 1, 2001, the department of ecology shall complete a final nonproject environmental impact statement that evaluates stream flows to meet the alternative goals of maintaining, preserving, or enhancing instream resources and the technically defensible methodologies for determining these stream flows.  Planning units engaged in a collaborative effort with the department under RCW 90.82.080 and state agencies assessing and setting or amending instream flows must, as a minimum, consider the goals and methodologies addressed in the nonproject environmental impact statement.  A planning unit engaged in a collaborative effort with the department under RCW 90.82.080 or state agency may assess, set, or amend instream flows in a manner that varies from the final nonproject environmental impact statement if consistent with applicable instream flow laws.

 

    Sec. 4.  RCW 90.03.380 and 2001 c 237 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The right to the use of water which has been applied to a beneficial use in the state shall be and remain appurtenant to the land or place upon which the same is used:  PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the right may be transferred to another or to others and become appurtenant to any other land or place of use without loss of priority of right theretofore established if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.  The point of diversion of water for beneficial use or the purpose of use may be changed, if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.  A change in the place of use, point of diversion, and/or purpose of use of a water right to enable irrigation of additional acreage or the addition of new uses may be permitted if such change results in no increase in the annual consumptive quantity of water used under the water right.  For purposes of this section, "annual consumptive quantity" means the estimated or actual annual amount of water diverted pursuant to the water right, reduced by the estimated annual amount of return flows, averaged over the two years of greatest use within the most recent five-year period of continuous beneficial use of the water right.  Before any transfer of such right to use water or change of the point of diversion of water or change of purpose of use can be made, any person having an interest in the transfer or change, shall file a written application therefor with the department, and the application shall not be granted until notice of the application is published as provided in RCW 90.03.280.  If it shall appear that such transfer or such change may be made without injury or detriment to existing rights, the department shall issue to the applicant a certificate in duplicate granting the right for such transfer or for such change of point of diversion or of use.  The certificate so issued shall be filed and be made a record with the department and the duplicate certificate issued to the applicant may be filed with the county auditor in like manner and with the same effect as provided in the original certificate or permit to divert water.

    (2) If an application for change proposes to transfer water rights from one irrigation district to another, the department shall, before publication of notice, receive concurrence from each of the irrigation districts that such transfer or change will not adversely affect the ability to deliver water to other landowners or impair the financial integrity of either of the districts.

    (3) A change in place of use by an individual water user or users of water provided by an irrigation district need only receive approval for the change from the board of directors of the district if the use of water continues within the irrigation district, and when water is provided by an irrigation entity that is a member of a board of joint control created under chapter 87.80 RCW, approval need only be received from the board of joint control if the use of water continues within the area of jurisdiction of the joint board and the change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights.

    (4) This section shall not apply to trust water rights acquired by the state through the funding of water conservation projects under chapter 90.38 RCW or RCW 90.42.010 through 90.42.070.

    (5)(a) Pending applications for new water rights are not entitled to protection from impairment, injury, or detriment when an application relating to an existing surface or ground water right is considered.

    (b) Applications relating to existing surface or ground water rights may be processed and decisions on them rendered independently of processing and rendering decisions on pending applications for new water rights within the same source of supply without regard to the date of filing of the pending applications for new water rights.

    (c) Notwithstanding any other existing authority to process applications, including but not limited to the authority to process applications under WAC 173-152-050 as it existed on January 1, 2001, an application relating to an existing surface or ground water right may be processed ahead of a previously filed application relating to an existing right when sufficient information for a decision on the previously filed application is not available and the applicant for the previously filed application is sent written notice that explains what information is not available and informs the applicant that processing of the next application will begin.  The previously filed application does not lose its priority date and if the information is provided by the applicant within sixty days, the previously filed application shall be processed at that time.  This subsection (5)(c) does not affect any other existing authority to process applications.

    (d) Nothing in this subsection (5) is intended to stop the processing of applications for new water rights.

    (6) No applicant for a change, transfer, or amendment of a water right may be required to give up any part of the applicant's valid water right or claim to a state agency, the trust water rights program, or to other persons as a ((condition)) precondition of obtaining processing of the application.

    (7) In revising the provisions of this section and adding provisions to this section by chapter 237, Laws of 2001, the legislature does not intend to imply legislative approval or disapproval of any existing administrative policy regarding, or any existing administrative or judicial interpretation of, the provisions of this section not expressly added or revised.

 


                            --- END ---