S-3997.1  _______________________________________________

 

                         SENATE BILL 6810

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington   57th Legislature        2002 Regular Session

 

By Senators Winsley, Rasmussen, McCaslin, Regala and West

 

Read first time 02/07/2002.  Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

Limiting imposition of costs of supervision for deferred prosecutions.


    AN ACT Relating to costs of supervision for deferred prosecutions; and amending RCW 10.01.160 and 10.05.170.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 10.01.160 and 1995 c 221 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) The court may require a defendant to pay costs.  Costs may be imposed only upon a convicted defendant, except for costs imposed upon a defendant's entry into a deferred prosecution program or costs imposed upon a defendant for preparing and serving a warrant for failure to appear.

    (2) Costs shall be limited to expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant or in administering the deferred prosecution program under chapter 10.05 RCW.  They cannot include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made by the public irrespective of specific violations of law.  Expenses incurred for serving of warrants for failure to appear and jury fees under RCW 10.46.190 may be included in costs the court may require a defendant to pay.  Costs for administering a deferred prosecution may not exceed one hundred fifty dollars including costs for supervision or probation.  Costs for preparing and serving a warrant for failure to appear may not exceed one hundred dollars.  Costs of incarceration imposed on a defendant convicted of a misdemeanor or a gross misdemeanor may not exceed fifty dollars per day of incarceration.  Payment of other court-ordered financial obligations, including all legal financial obligations and costs of supervision take precedence over the payment of the cost of incarceration ordered by the court.  All funds received from defendants for the cost of incarceration in the county or city jail must be remitted for criminal justice purposes to the county or city that is responsible for the defendant's jail costs.  Costs imposed constitute a judgment against a defendant and survive a dismissal of the underlying action against the defendant.  However, if the defendant is acquitted on the underlying action, the costs for preparing and serving a warrant for failure to appear do not survive the acquittal, and the judgment that such costs would otherwise constitute shall be vacated.

    (3) The court shall not sentence a defendant to pay costs unless the defendant is or will be able to pay them.  In determining the amount and method of payment of costs, the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose.

    (4) A defendant who has been sentenced to pay costs and who is not in contumacious default in the payment thereof may at any time petition the sentencing court for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion thereof.  If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant's immediate family, the court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or modify the method of payment under RCW 10.01.170.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 10.05.170 and 1991 c 247 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    As a condition of granting deferred prosecution, the court may order supervision of the petitioner during the period of deferral ((and may levy a monthly assessment upon the petitioner as provided in RCW 10.64.120)).  In a jurisdiction with a probation department, the court may appoint the probation department to supervise the petitioner.  In a jurisdiction without a probation department, the court may appoint an appropriate person or agency to supervise the petitioner.  A supervisor appointed under this section shall be required to do at least the following:

    (1) If the charge for which deferral is granted relates to operation of a motor vehicle, at least once every six months request from the department of licensing an abstract of the petitioner's driving record; and

    (2) At least once every month make contact with the petitioner or with any agency to which the petitioner has been directed for treatment as a part of the deferral.

 


                            --- END ---