CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

              ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1997

 

 

                   Chapter 326, Laws of 2001

 

 

                        57th Legislature

                2001 Regular Legislative Session

 

 

INDUSTRIAL LAND BANKS

 

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  7/22/01

Passed by the House March 13, 2001

  Yeas 96   Nays 0

 

 

              FRANK CHOPP

Speaker of the House of Representatives

     

 

 

             CLYDE BALLARD

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

 

 

Passed by the Senate April 18, 2001

  Yeas 43   Nays 3

             CERTIFICATE

 

We, Timothy A. Martin and Cynthia Zehnder, Co-Chief Clerks of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1997  as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

           CYNTHIA ZEHNDER

                          Chief Clerk

 

 

          TIMOTHY A. MARTIN

                          Chief Clerk

               BRAD OWEN

President of the Senate

 

 

 

Approved May 15, 2001 Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.               

                                FILED                

 

             May 15, 2001 - 2:50 p.m.

 

              GARY LOCKE

Governor of the State of Washington

                 Secretary of State

                 State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

               ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1997

          _______________________________________________

 

             Passed Legislature - 2001 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      57th Legislature     2001 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Local Government & Housing (originally sponsored by Representatives Alexander, DeBolt, Doumit, Mulliken, Dunshee, Mielke, Kessler, Hatfield and Ogden)

 

Read first time 02/26/2001.  Referred to Committee on .

Revising provisions relating to industrial land banks.  


    AN ACT Relating to establishing industrial land banks outside urban growth areas; and amending RCW 36.70A.367.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    Sec. 1.  RCW 36.70A.367 and 1998 c 289 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

    (1) In addition to the major industrial development allowed under RCW 36.70A.365, a county required or choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 that meets the criteria in subsection (9) or (10) of this section may establish, in consultation with cities consistent with provisions of RCW 36.70A.210, a process for designating a bank of no more than two master planned locations for major industrial activity outside urban growth areas.

    (2) A master planned location for major industrial developments outside an urban growth area may be included in the urban industrial land bank for the county if criteria including, but not limited to, the following are met:

    (a) New infrastructure is provided for and/or applicable impact fees are paid;

    (b) Transit-oriented site planning and traffic demand management programs are implemented;

    (c) Buffers are provided between the major industrial development and adjacent nonurban areas;

    (d) Environmental protection including air and water quality has been addressed and provided for;

    (e) Development regulations are established to ensure that urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

    (f) Provision is made to mitigate adverse impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands;

    (g) The plan for the major industrial development is consistent with the county's development regulations established for protection of critical areas; and

    (h) An inventory of developable land has been conducted as provided in RCW 36.70A.365.

    (3) In selecting master planned locations for inclusion in the urban industrial land bank, priority shall be given to locations that are adjacent to, or in close proximity to, an urban growth area.

    (4) Final approval of inclusion of a master planned location in the urban industrial land bank shall be considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070, except that RCW 36.70A.130(2) does not apply so that inclusion or exclusion of master planned locations may be considered at any time.

    (5) Once a master planned location has been included in the urban industrial land bank, manufacturing and industrial businesses that qualify as major industrial development under RCW 36.70A.365 may be located there.

    (6) Nothing in this section may be construed to alter the requirements for a county to comply with chapter 43.21C RCW.

    (7)(a) The authority of a county meeting the criteria of subsection (9) of this section to engage in the process of including or excluding master planned locations from the urban industrial land bank shall terminate on December 31, 1999.  However, any location included in the urban industrial land bank on December 31, 1999, shall ((remain)) be available for major industrial development as long as the criteria of subsection (2) of this section ((continue to be)) are met.

    (b) The authority of a county meeting the criteria of subsection (10) of this section to engage in the process of including or excluding master planned locations from the urban industrial land bank terminates on December 31, 2002.  However, any location included in the urban industrial land bank on December 31, 2002, shall be available for major industrial development as long as the criteria of subsection (2) of this section are met.

    (8) For the purposes of this section, "major industrial development" means a master planned location suitable for manufacturing or industrial businesses that:  (a) Requires a parcel of land so large that no suitable parcels are available within an urban growth area; or (b) is a natural resource-based industry requiring a location near agricultural land, forest land, or mineral resource land upon which it is dependent; or (c) requires a location with characteristics such as proximity to transportation facilities or related industries such that there is no suitable location in an urban growth area.  The major industrial development may not be for the purpose of retail commercial development or multitenant office parks.

    (9) This section ((applies)) and the termination date specified in subsection (7)(a) of this section apply to a county that at the time the process is established under subsection (1) of this section:

    (a) Has a population greater than two hundred fifty thousand and is part of a metropolitan area that includes a city in another state with a population greater than two hundred fifty thousand;

    (b) Has a population greater than one hundred forty thousand and is adjacent to another country; or

    (c) Has a population greater than forty thousand but less than seventy-five thousand and has an average level of unemployment for the preceding three years that exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent; and

    (i) Is bordered by the Pacific Ocean; or

    (ii) Is located in the Interstate 5 or Interstate 90 corridor.

    (10) This section and the termination date specified in subsection (7)(b) of this section apply to a county that at the time the process is established under subsection (1) of this section:

    (a) Has a population greater than forty thousand but fewer than eighty thousand;

    (b) Has an average level of unemployment for the preceding three years that exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent; and

    (c) Is located in the Interstate 5 or Interstate 90 corridor.


    Passed the House March 13, 2001.

    Passed the Senate April 18, 2001.

Approved by the Governor May 15, 2001.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 15, 2001.