ADOPTED 3/5/04

6643 AMH CFS FORL 032

 

 

 

 

 

SB 6643 - H COMM AMD

By Committee on Children & Family Services

 

 

   Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

 

   "Sec. 1. RCW 13.34.136 and 2003 c 227 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) Whenever a child is ordered removed from the child's home, the agency charged with his or her care shall provide the court with:

   (a) A permanency plan of care that shall identify one of the following outcomes as a primary goal and may identify additional outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption; guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and the care provider; successful completion of a responsible living skills program; or independent living, if appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older. The department shall not discharge a child to an independent living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW;

   (b) Unless the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(4), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to return the child home, what steps the agency will take to promote existing appropriate sibling relationships and/or facilitate placement together or contact in accordance with the best interests of each child, and what actions the agency will take to maintain parent-child ties. All aspects of the plan shall include the goal of achieving permanence for the child.

   (i) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents will be offered to enable them to resume custody, what requirements the parents must meet to resume custody, and a time limit for each service plan and parental requirement.

   (ii) Visitation is the right of the family, including the child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the child. Early, consistent, and frequent visitation is crucial for maintaining parent-child relationships and making it possible for parents and children to safely reunify. The agency shall encourage the maximum parent and child and sibling contact possible, when it is in the best interest of the child, including regular visitation and participation by the parents in the care of the child while the child is in placement. Visitation shall not be limited as a sanction for a parent's failure to comply with court orders or services where the health, safety, or welfare of the child is not at risk as a result of the visitation. Visitation may be limited or denied only if the court determines that such limitation or denial is necessary to protect the child's health, safety, or welfare. The court and the agency should rely upon community resources, relatives, foster parents, and other appropriate persons to provide transportation and supervision for visitation to the extent that such resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.

   (iii) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home as possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless the court finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary to promote the child's or parents' well-being.

   (iv) The agency charged with supervising a child in placement shall provide all reasonable services that are available within the agency, or within the community, or those services which the department has existing contracts to purchase. It shall report to the court if it is unable to provide such services; and

   (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(4), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition. The agency shall not be required to develop a plan of services for the parents or provide services to the parents if the court orders a termination petition be filed. However, reasonable efforts to ensure visitation and contact between siblings shall be made unless there is reasonable cause to believe the best interests of the child or siblings would be jeopardized.

   (2) If the court determines that the continuation of reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need to remove the child from his or her home or to safely return the child home should not be part of the permanency plan of care for the child, reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.

   (3) The court shall consider the child's relationships with the child's siblings in accordance with RCW 13.34.130(3).

 

   NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

   The court may order expert evaluations of parties to obtain information regarding visitation issues or other issues in a case. These evaluations shall be performed by appointed evaluators who are mutually agreed upon by the court, the state, and the parents' counsel, and, if the child is to be evaluated, by the representative for the child. If no agreement can be reached, the court shall select the expert evaluator.  

 

   NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

   The department of social and health services shall develop consistent policies and protocols, based on current relevant research, concerning visitation for dependent children to be implemented consistently throughout the state. The department shall develop the policies and protocols in consultation with researchers in the field, community-based agencies, court-appointed special advocates, parents' representatives, and court representatives. The policies and protocols shall include, but not be limited to: The structure and quality of visitations; and training for caseworkers, visitation supervisors, and foster parents related to visitation.

   The policies and protocols shall be consistent with the provisions of this chapter and implementation of the policies and protocols shall be consistent with relevant orders of the court.

 

   NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. The department of social and health services shall report on the policies and protocols required under section 3 of this act to the appropriate committees of the legislature by January 1, 2005."

 

   Correct the title.

 

 

EFFECT:

 

   Provides that visitation is the right of the family, including the child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the child.

 

   Limits the current requirement that the agency charged with a child's care encourage the maximum parent and child and sibling contact possible to when it is in the best interest of the child.

   Provides that reliance upon specified resources to provide transportation and supervision for visitation is limited to the extent that those resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.

 

   Eliminates the provision that supervision of visitation shall not be required except when necessary to protect the child's health, safety, or welfare.

 

   Provides that the court may order expert evaluations of parties, to obtain information regarding visitation issues or other issues in a case, to be performed by appointed evaluators who are mutually agreed upon by the court, the state, and the parents' counsel, and, if the child is to be evaluated, by the representative for the child. If no agreement can be reached, the court shall select the expert evaluator.  

 

   Requires the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) to develop consistent policies and protocols, based on current relevant research, concerning visitation for dependent children to be implemented consistently throughout the state. Requires the DSHS to develop the policies and protocols in consultation with researchers in the field, community-based agencies, Court-Appointed Special Advocates, parents' representatives, and court representatives. The policies and protocols shall include, but not be limited to: the structure and quality of visitations; and training for caseworkers, visitation supervisors, and foster parents related to visitation. The policies and protocols shall also be consistent with the provisions of chapter 13.34 RCW and implementation of the policies and protocols shall be consistent with relevant orders of the court.

 

   Requires the DSHS to report on the policies and protocols concerning visitation for dependent children to the appropriate committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2005.