5375-S AMS DOUM S2454.1

SSB 5375 - S AMD 123

By Senators Doumit, Oke

ADOPTED 03/19/2003

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that one of the state's primary fish habitat protection statutes is the hydraulic project approval program. This program is one of the state's oldest environmental regulatory programs, and as a consequence it has been developed in an incremental manner over many decades.

The legislature further finds that federal review of proposed in- water projects under provisions of the endangered species act are in most conditions the equivalent of requirements under the state's hydraulic project approval process, and that requiring projects to receive dual approvals causes project delays, is redundant, and may lead to conflicting project conditions.

The legislature further finds that it would benefit the department of fish and wildlife, the regulated community, and the fisheries resources of the state if this important regulatory program were improved with measures to improve its efficiency and predictability, as well as its coordination with the many local, state, and federal fish and habitat protection statutes and regulatory programs that have been created since the inception of the hydraulic project approval program.

The legislature therefore intends to improve the process of regulating construction in state waters with policy measures that improve predictability for entities that work in state waters, and make the best use of limited state resources by ensuring that regulatory reviews of in-water construction are made in an efficient manner.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 77.55 RCW to read as follows:

(1)(a) The department must develop general permits for common or routine activities to improve the predictability and efficiency of the hydraulic project approval program. At a minimum, the department must, by December 2004, develop general permits for the following activities:

(i) Routine repair and maintenance of existing over-water serviceable structures, including replacement of up to sixty pilings;

(ii) Minor dredging of up to ten yards of sediment from an existing channel, berthing area, or boat ramp;

(iii) Routine repair and maintenance of tide gates;

(iv) Construction of mooring dolphins and fender pilings;

(v) Routine repair, maintenance, or replacement of road and highway structures such as culverts and ditches;

(vi) Routine repair and maintenance of bridges; and

(vii) Geotechnical or exploratory work conducted as part of project planning or development.

(b) The department may develop additional general permits for in- water construction activities as available resources allow.

(2) General permits must contain conditions necessary to protect fish life, and must clearly delineate predictable conditions and restrictions that project applicants may incorporate into project design and construction. The department must develop, in consultation with an advisory committee, common technical provisions that must be incorporated into general conditions for each general permit.

(3) The department shall post electronically and otherwise make generally available the following information for each general permit:

(a) A description of activities covered;

(b) The conditions and practices a project applicant must follow to receive coverage under the permit; and

(4) To receive coverage under a general permit, a project applicant must:

(a) Send a notice of intent to follow the conditions of a general permit to the department twenty-one days before construction is to begin; and

(b) Post the general permit prominently at the worksite.

(5) Within ten days of receipt of a notice of intent from a project applicant, the department must notify the applicant of the status of general permit coverage.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 77.55 RCW to read as follows:

(1) Certain federal, state, and local regulatory review processes may provide review and protection of fish life that is equivalent to the review provided by the department under this chapter. This may include, among other permits, federal review of a project under the endangered species act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), a federal permit under section 404 of the federal water pollution control act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), state review of a project under section 401 of the federal water pollution control act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), or local government review of a project to protect critical areas under RCW 36.70A.060 or shorelines under chapter 90.58 RCW.

(2) At any point in project development or permitting, an applicant may submit to the department a notice of intent to proceed under an equivalent regulatory review. The notice must include a description of the project, the habitat impacted, and the equivalent permits required for the project. The department's regional manager of the hydraulic project approval program shall make a determination regarding the equivalency of other regulatory permits within fifteen days of receiving the notice. If the notice of equivalency is approved, the project is exempt from the requirement to receive hydraulic project approval under this chapter. If the notice of equivalency is denied, the department must provide the applicant, in writing, specific reasons why the other regulatory reviews will not adequately protect fish life. (3) Upon request by a county or city, the department shall certify that a county or city, through its implementation of critical areas protections, including fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, under RCW 36.70A.060, or development regulations implementing an adopted and approved shoreline master program under chapter 90.58 RCW, provides equivalent review and protection for fish life to that otherwise provided by the department through issuance of a hydraulic project approval. A city or county may request certification for all hydraulic projects or certain hydraulic project types. If certification is approved, project types specified in the certification and within the jurisdiction of the city or county are exempt from the requirement to receive hydraulic project approval under this chapter. If the department rejects the request for certification, it shall provide in writing a statement of how and why the regulations do not provide equivalent protection for fish life, and provide recommendations that would result in equivalency.

(4) Any person aggrieved by a decision under subsection (2) or (3) of this section may appeal the decision according to the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 77.55 RCW to read as follows:

The department must develop procedures to ensure consistency of application of hydraulic project approval conditions, to include the following:

(1) Common technical conditions for saltwater and freshwater projects. These common technical conditions must, at a minimum, address allowable in-water work periods, and must recognize the need to maintain an economically competitive waterfront business and port community, and must meet the needs of infrastructure development as defined in RCW 90.74.010;

(2) Internal departmental permit review procedures that promote consistency within and between regions; and

(3) Habitat protection guidance for regional staff that result in predictable permit conditions for project applicants.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 77.55 RCW to read as follows:

(1) An expedited dispute resolution process is created to resolve disputes regarding hydraulic project approvals issued under this chapter. The expedited dispute resolution process may be initiated by a project applicant at any point prior to issuance of the final hydraulic project approval. When a project applicant requests review under the expedited dispute resolution process, the forty-five day period for permit issuance is suspended until the review process is complete.

(2) When a project applicant requests the expedited dispute resolution process, the department must convene an expedited dispute resolution process committee within fourteen days. The expedited dispute resolution process committee consists of four members:

(a) The project contractor or engineer;

(b) A department engineer;

(d) An engineer or public works official designated by the local government with jurisdiction over the project.

(3) The expedited dispute resolution process committee must conduct a project review to determine whether the conditions in the proposed hydraulic project approval are reasonable and necessary to protect fish life. By majority vote, the committee may accept the permit conditions, reject the permit conditions and return the permit to the department for subsequent review, or determine alternative conditions to be included in the final hydraulic project approval permit. Decisions of the committee are binding on the department.

(4) The department must provide to each project applicant notice of the applicant's right to an expedited dispute resolution conference, and the procedures for informal and formal appeal. This information must also include:

(a) Contact information for the department employee who will be reviewing the project;

(b) Contact information for the department's regional program manager responsible for overseeing the regional hydraulic project activities at any point prior to the approval or denial of a hydraulic project approval;

(d) The proper address to which informal or formal appeals must be sent.

Sec. 6. RCW 77.55.100 and 2002 c 368 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) In the event that any person or government agency desires to construct any form of hydraulic project or perform other work within the bed of any state waters that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state, such person or government agency shall, before commencing construction or work thereon and to ensure the proper protection of fish life, secure the approval of the department as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life. This approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or unreasonably conditioned.

(2)(a) The department shall grant or deny approval of a standard permit within forty-five calendar days of the receipt of a complete application and notice of compliance with any applicable requirements of the state environmental policy act, made in the manner prescribed in this section. The permit must contain provisions allowing for minor modifications to the plans and specifications without requiring reissuance of the permit.

(b) The applicant may document receipt of application by filing in person or by registered mail. A complete application for approval shall contain general plans for the overall project, complete plans and specifications of the proposed construction or work within the mean higher high water line in salt water or within the ordinary high water line in fresh water, and complete plans and specifications for the proper protection of fish life.

(i) After ten working days of receipt of the application, the applicant remains unavailable or unable to arrange for a timely field evaluation of the proposed project;

(ii) The site is physically inaccessible for inspection; or

(iii) The applicant requests delay. Immediately upon determination that the forty-five day period is suspended, the department shall notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay.

(d) For purposes of this section, "standard permit" means a written permit issued by the department when the conditions under subsections (3) and (5)(b) of this section are not met.

(3)(a) The department may issue an expedited written permit in those instances where normal permit processing would result in significant hardship for the applicant or unacceptable damage to the environment. In cases of imminent danger, the department shall issue an expedited written permit, upon request, for work to repair existing structures, move obstructions, restore banks, protect property, or protect fish resources. Expedited permit requests require a complete written application as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section and shall be issued within fifteen calendar days of the receipt of a complete written application. Approval of an expedited permit is valid for up to sixty days from the date of issuance.

(b) For the purposes of this subsection, "imminent danger" means a threat by weather, water flow, or other natural conditions that is likely to occur within sixty days of a request for a permit application.

(c) The department may not require the provisions of the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, to be met as a condition of issuing a permit under this subsection.

(d) The department or the county legislative authority may determine if an imminent danger exists. The county legislative authority shall notify the department, in writing, if it determines that an imminent danger exists.

(4) Approval of a standard permit is valid for a period of up to five years from date of issuance. The permittee must demonstrate substantial progress on construction of that portion of the project relating to the approval within two years of the date of issuance. If the department denies approval, the department shall provide the applicant, in writing, a statement of the specific reasons why and how the proposed project would adversely affect fish life. Protection of fish life shall be the only ground upon which approval may be denied or conditioned. Chapter 34.05 RCW applies to any denial of project approval, conditional approval, or requirements for project modification upon which approval may be contingent.

(5)(a) In case of an emergency arising from weather or stream flow conditions or other natural conditions, the department, through its authorized representatives, shall issue immediately, upon request, oral approval for removing any obstructions, repairing existing structures, restoring stream banks, or to protect property threatened by the stream or a change in the stream flow without the necessity of obtaining a written approval prior to commencing work. Conditions of an oral approval to protect fish life shall be established by the department and reduced to writing within thirty days and complied with as provided for in this section. Oral approval shall be granted immediately, upon request, for a stream crossing during an emergency situation.

(b) For purposes of this section and RCW 77.55.110, "emergency" means an immediate threat to life, the public, property, or of environmental degradation.

(c) The department or the county legislative authority may declare and continue an emergency when one or more of the criteria under (b) of this subsection are met. The county legislative authority shall immediately notify the department if it declares an emergency under this subsection.

(6)(a) The department shall, at the request of a county, develop renewable five-year maintenance approval agreements, consistent with comprehensive flood control management plans adopted under the authority of RCW 86.12.200, or other watershed plan approved by a county legislative authority, to allow for work on public and private property for bank stabilization, bridge repair, removal of sand bars and debris, channel maintenance, and other flood damage repair and reduction activity under agreed-upon conditions and times without obtaining permits for specific projects.

(b) The department shall, at the request of any person or government agency, develop a renewable five-year maintenance approval agreement or a hydraulic project approval mitigation agreement to allow for work on public and private property for bank stabilization, bridge repair, removal of sandbars and debris, channel maintenance, and other flood damage repair and reduction activity under reasonable agreed-upon conditions and times without obtaining permits for specific projects.

(7) This section shall not apply to the construction of any form of hydraulic project or other work which diverts water for agricultural irrigation or stock watering purposes authorized under or recognized as being valid by the state's water codes, or when such hydraulic project or other work is associated with streambank stabilization to protect farm and agricultural land as defined in RCW 84.34.020. These irrigation or stock watering diversion and streambank stabilization projects shall be governed by RCW 77.55.110.

A landscape management plan approved by the department and the department of natural resources under RCW 76.09.350(2), shall serve as a hydraulic project approval for the life of the plan if fish are selected as one of the public resources for coverage under such a plan.

(8) For the purposes of this section and RCW 77.55.110, "bed" means the land below the ordinary high water lines of state waters. This definition does not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm water run-off devices, or other artificial watercourses except where they exist in a natural watercourse that has been altered by man.

(9) The phrase "to construct any form of hydraulic project or perform other work" does not include the act of driving across an established ford. Driving across streams or on wetted stream beds at areas other than established fords requires approval. Work within the ordinary high water line of state waters to construct or repair a ford or crossing requires approval.

(10) For the purposes of this section, "sandbars" includes, but is not limited to, sand, gravel, rock, silt, and sediments."

SSB 5375 - S AMD 123

By Senators Doumit, Oke

ADOPTED 03/19/2003

On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "program;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 77.55.100; adding new sections to chapter 77.55 RCW; and creating a new section."

--- END ---