Sponsors: Representatives Veloria, Skinner, Eickmeyer, McCoy, Miloscia, McDonald and Condotta.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

• Creates provisions in the Residential Landlord Tenant Act that apply to "drug and alcohol free housing."

• Provides procedures for a landlord of "drug and alcohol free housing" to terminate the rental agreement of a tenant who has been living in the housing for less than two years if the tenant violates the prohibition against using, possessing, or sharing alcohol or drugs either on or off the premises.

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Moeller, Vice Chair; McMahan, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Campbell, Flannigan, Kirby and Lovick.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Carrell, Ranking Minority Member; and Newhouse.

A variety of state laws regulate the relationship between landlords and tenants. The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act (RLTA) governs the renting of residential dwelling units. The RLTA establishes the duties and liabilities of landlords and tenants with respect to each other, and provides procedures for each side to enforce its rights.

Some of the tenant's specified duties include the duty to pay rent as required by the rental agreement, keep the premises clean and sanitary, and not engage in drug related activity on the premises.

The landlord may terminate a tenancy if there has been a substantial noncompliance with the tenant's duties, such as the failure to pay rent or perform other conditions of a rental agreement. The landlord must give the tenant written notice before termination and, depending upon the circumstances, allow the tenant time to come into compliance. The number of days required for notice depends on the reasons for the termination of the tenancy.

A three-day notice is required if the tenant fails to pay rent. A 10-day notice is required if the tenant fails to perform conditions of the rental agreement. The notice must set forth the noncompliance by the tenant so that the tenant can cure the deficiency. If the tenant fails to comply, the landlord may bring an unlawful detainer action.

An unlawful detainer action is a court process to evict a tenant who remains on the rental premises beyond the time he or she is required to leave. The landlord must serve an "eviction summons" on the tenant, and the tenant has a certain number of days to respond. The landlord may seek a pretrial hearing in court directing the tenant to show cause why the court should not issue a writ of restitution (an order directing the sheriff to evict the tenant).

"Drug and alcohol free housing" is defined in the RTLA. "Drug and alcohol free housing" means housing in which:

(a) each of the units on the premises is occupied or held for occupancy by at least one tenant who is a recovering alcoholic or drug addict and is participating in a recovery program;

(b) the landlord is a for-profit or nonprofit corporation or a housing authority;

(c) the landlord provides certain services, such as an employee who monitors the tenants for compliance, individual and group support, and access to a recovery program; and

(d) the rental agreement includes certain provisions regarding prohibitions against the use, possession, or sharing of alcohol or drugs either on or off premises.

The tenant must provide written verification from the tenant's recovery program that the tenant is participating in the program and not using drugs or alcohol. The landlord has the right to require urine analysis tests at the landlord's discretion and expense.

If a tenant who has been living in the drug and alcohol free housing for less than two years uses, possesses, or shares alcohol or drugs, the landlord may deliver a written notice to the tenant terminating the tenancy. The notice must specify the acts constituting the drug and alcohol violation and must state that the rental agreement terminates in not less than three days after delivery of the notice. The notice must also state that the tenant can cure the violation by a change in conduct or otherwise within one day after delivery of the notice. If the tenant cures the violation within the one-day period, the tenancy shall not be terminated.

If a substantially similar violation occurs a second time within 6 months of the previous violation, the landlord may terminate the tenancy with delivery of at least a three-day written notice. The tenant does not have the right to cure the subsequent violation.

Notwithstanding the definition of drug and alcohol free housing, non-transient housing in which a tenant must abstain from drugs and alcohol as a condition of occupancy and pays for the housing on a periodic basis (whether the payment is characterized as rent or program fees) is covered by the RTLA.

The original bill allowed the landlord to serve a 48-hour notice terminating the tenancy for the first and second violations. The original bill allowed the landlord to remove the tenant from the premises without going to court (bringing an unlawful detainer action) after the second violation. The original bill also applied the expedited procedures to all tenants in the drug and alcohol free housing, instead of tenants who have been living in the housing for less than two years.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For: (Substitute bill) These housing arrangements are important for people recovering from addiction. They provide a crucial step for these folks, but when a tenant relapses and refuses to participate in treatment, then it is difficult to evict that tenant. That tenant's behavior has a big impact on the other tenants. This kind of housing is an advantage to communities because it gets recovering addicts off the streets and into stable housing. This bill amends the RTLA to create a category for clean and sober housing. Other types of low income housing that might be available to people in treatment have too many temptations. This bill is a creative method of encouraging this type of housing for this particular population. This sort of housing requires zero tolerance. This bill was modeled on Oregon legislation. The bill strikes a good balance.

Testified: Representative Veloria, prime sponsor; Bill Hallerman, Archdiocesan Housing Authority; Kevin Glackin-Coley, Washington State Catholic Conference; Nick Federicci, Washington Low Income Housing Congress; Seth Dawson, Washington State Coalition for the Homeless; and Doug Levy, City of Everett and City of Kent.