HOUSE BILL REPORT

ESHB 1845


 

 

 




As Passed Legislature

 

Title: An act relating to exempting bank account, social security, and credit card numbers from public disclosure.

 

Brief Description: Exempting bank account, social security, and credit card numbers from public disclosure.

 

Sponsors: By House Committee on State Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Newhouse, Schual-Berke, Benson, Kirby, Linville, Moeller, Chase, Bush, Upthegrove, Veloria, McIntire, Skinner, Mielke and Rockefeller).


Brief History:

Committee Activity:

State Government: 2/28/03, 3/4/03 [DPS].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 3/15/03, 95-0.

Senate Amended.

Passed Senate: 4/8/03, 47-0.

House Concurred.

Passed House: 4/21/03, 97-0.

Passed Legislature.

 

Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill

    Broadens the current public disclosure exemption for credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, etc., by deleting the limitation when supplied to an agency for the purpose of electronic transfer of funds.

 



 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT


Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Haigh, Chair; Miloscia, Vice Chair; Armstrong, Ranking Minority Member; Shabro, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hunt, McDermott, Nixon, Tom and Wallace.

 

Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).

 

Background:

 

The open public records law was approved by state voters in 1972 as part of Initiative Measure No. 276. All public records of state agencies and local governments are open to public inspection and copying unless a law expressly excludes the public record from public inspection and copying. This disclosure requirement is liberally construed and any exception is narrowly constructed.

 

A person's right to privacy is invaded or violated only if disclosure of information about the person: (1) would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Beyond that, only those records expressly identified are considered exempt from disclosure.

 

Many exemptions to the law currently exist, including:

 

          personal information on students in public schools, patients or clients of public institutions or public health agencies, or welfare recipients;

          information revealing the identity of persons who are witnesses to or victims of crime;

          test questions, scoring keys, and other examination data used to administer a licence, employment, or academic examination;

          financial and valuable trade information; and

          credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, card expiration dates, or bank or other financial account numbers supplied to an agency for the purpose of electronic transfer of funds.

 


 

 

Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:

 

Current law exempts credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, card expiration dates, or bank or other financial account numbers from public disclosure when supplied to an agency for the purpose of electronic transfer of funds, except when disclosure is required by law. This exemption is broadened by removing the limitation when supplied to an agency for the purpose of electronic transfer of funds.

 


 

 

Appropriation: None.

 

Fiscal Note: Not Requested.

 

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For: This legislation is part of a package of bills recommended by the Fraud Task Force. The estimate for financial fraud is in excess of $50 million, most of which is through check, ATM and credit card fraud by organized crime. Perpetrators get information from public records. Even though the courts have upheld that social security numbers are exempt through a person's right to privacy, the numbers are still being released because many people are not aware of this interpretation. Explicitly listing social security numbers as exempt from public disclosure will help.

 

(In support with amendment) Consumer reporting agencies need access to social security numbers. Financial institutions need access to numbers to prevent fraud.

 

Testimony Against: The bill creates some unforseen problems that need to be considered more carefully. Enforcement of judgments for child support or making payments for services for the state are some areas of concern.

 

Testified: (In support) Gary Gardner, Boeing Employees Credit Union; Denny Eliason, Washington Bankers Association; and Dave Horn, Office of the Attorney General.

 

(In support with amendment) Cliff Webster, Consumer Data Industry Association.

 

(Opposed) Rowland Thompson, Allied Daily Newspapers.