Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

 ANALYSIS

State Government Committee

 

 

HB 1987

Brief Description: Ensuring the integrity of the state contracting process.

 

Sponsors: Representatives Miloscia, Haigh, Veloria, Conway, Flannigan, Blake, Ruderman, McCoy, Eickmeyer and Lovick.


Brief Summary of Bill

    Debars vendors from future consideration on contracts with the state for conviction of certain crimes, nonperformance, and failure to follow procedures for a period of up to eight years.


Hearing Date: 3/4/03


Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).


Background:


The Department of General Administration (GA) may reject the bid of any bidder who has failed to perform satisfactorily on a previous contract with the state. In the "Guide to Personal Service Contracting" agencies are advised on managing and monitoring contracts. The level of monitoring is based on a risk assessment of the contractor's role in delivering the services under the terms of the contract. Contract managers are advised to evaluate consultant performance based on:

    achievement of project goals and objectives;

    timely completion of work;

    quality of work measured against project objectives;

    quantity of work;

    professional manner and conduct;

    working relationship with agency staff; and

    quality of project management.


There are currently no provisions in statute for debarment of contractors that provide goods and services.


Summary of Bill:


A vendor or potential vendor may be debarred from consideration of an award for contract for the provisions of goods or services if, within the past three years, the vendor has:

 

    been convicted of a criminal offense to the application for or performance of a state contract or subcontract;

    been convicted of an offense including but not limited to, embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or violating state or federal antitrust statutes;

    been convicted of any other offense, or violated any other state or federal law that would indicate the vendor is unable to perform responsibly;

    failed to substantially perform a state contract or subcontract

    violated bid solicitation procedures;

    refused to provide, or failed to respond to requests, for information necessary for monitoring contract performance; or

    failed to perform in a manner consistent with any applicable state or federal law, rule or regulation.


If grounds for debarment are found to exist, the GA will notify the vendor of a the procedure for requesting a hearing. If the vendor does not respond within 20 calendar days, the GA may issue the decision to debar without a hearing. Debarment may be for up to a period of eight years. After the period of debarment expires, the vendor may reapply for inclusion on bidder lists through the normal application process.


Appropriation: None.


Fiscal Note: Requested on February 26, 2003.


Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.