SENATE BILL REPORT
2SSB 5694
As Passed Senate, March 16, 2003
Title: An act relating to an integrated permit system.
Brief Description: Creating a pilot project to develop an integrated environmental permit system.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Swecker, Jacobsen, Horn, Doumit, Haugen and Rasmussen).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Economic Development: 2/19/03, 2/26/03 [DPS-WM].
Ways & Means: 3/3/03, 3/6/03 [DP2S].
Passed Senate: 3/16/03, 48-0.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5694 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.
Signed by Senators T. Sheldon, Chair; Zarelli, Vice Chair; Benton, Hale, Rossi, Schmidt, B. Sheldon and Shin.
Staff: Jack Brummel (786-7428)
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5694 be substituted therefor, and the second substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Rossi, Chair; Hewitt, Vice Chair; Zarelli, Vice Chair; Doumit, Fairley, Fraser, Hale, Honeyford, Johnson, Parlette, Poulsen, Regala, Roach, Sheahan, B. Sheldon and Winsley.
Staff: Richard Ramsey (786-7412)
Background: The environmental review and permitting process is controlled by a number of statutes. It has been suggested that the integration of the documentation and procedures needed for agency decisionmaking would streamline the permitting process.
Summary of Bill: By December 1, 2005, the Office of Permit Assistance must develop: (1) a guide for creating a unified project decision support document for state and federal agencies and local governments; (2) recommendations for an integrated permit system to integrate project design, review, permitting, and mitigation; recommendations for legislative changes needed to establish the system; and recommendations for full-scale testing of the system through a pilot project.
Meeting the requirements to develop a guide and recommendations is done through a pilot project of economic development significance. The office must submit reports on its efforts on December 1, 2003, and December 1, 2005.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 16, 2003.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For (Economic Development): Current technology can make the permitting process a lot more effective and efficient. We need ways for agencies to participate in a coordinated fashion.
Testimony Against (Economic Development): None.
Testified (Economic Development): Senator Swecker, prime sponsor (pro); Carl Kassenbaum, CRK Environmental Management (pro); Greg Hueckel, Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (pro); Sue Mauermann, Dept. of Ecology (pro); Bryan Wahl, WA Assn. of Realtors (pro); Grant Nelson, AWB (pro); Ron Shultz, Governor's Office (pro).
Testimony For (Ways & Means): None.
Testimony Against (Ways & Means): None.
Testified (Ways & Means): No one.
House Amendment(s): The House amendment adds definitions, an expiration date, and a null and void clause; ensures that public involvement opportunities are maintained or enhanced; and makes clear the integrated permit system will not modify or change any agency's substantive regulatory authority.