READ FIRST TIME 01/28/04.   

     AN ACT Relating to regional transportation investment districts; amending RCW 36.120.010, 36.120.020, 36.120.030, 36.120.040, 36.120.050, 36.120.060, 36.120.070, 36.120.090, 36.120.140, 36.120.190, 36.120.200, 47.56.076, and 82.14.430; adding a new section to chapter 36.120 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 47.56 RCW; and adding a new section to chapter 82.80 RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 36.120.010 and 2002 c 56 s 101 are each amended to read as follows:
     The legislature finds that:
     (1) The capacity of many of Washington state's transportation facilities have failed to keep up with the state's growth, particularly in major urban regions;
     (2) The state cannot by itself fund, in a timely way, many of the major capacity and other improvements required on highways of statewide significance ((in the state's largest urbanized area)) and facilities that are an identified risk for failure;
     (3) Providing a transportation system that provides efficient mobility for persons and freight requires a shared partnership and responsibility between the state, local, and regional governments and the private sector; and
     (4) Timely construction and development of significant transportation improvement projects can best be achieved through enhanced funding options for governments at the county and regional levels, using already existing tax authority to address roadway and multimodal needs and new authority for regions to address critical transportation projects ((of statewide significance)).

Sec. 2   RCW 36.120.020 and 2002 c 56 s 102 are each amended to read as follows:
     The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
     (1) "Board" means the governing body of a regional transportation investment district.
     (2) "Department" means the Washington state department of transportation.
     (3) "Highway of statewide significance" means an existing or proposed state route or federal interstate designated as a highway of statewide significance by the transportation commission, its successor entity, or the legislature.
     (4) "Lead agency" means a public agency that by law can plan, design, and build a transportation project and has been so designated by the district.
     (5) "Regional transportation investment district" or "district" means a municipal corporation ((whose boundaries are coextensive with two or more contiguous counties and)) that has been created by a county legislative authority or authorities and a vote of the people under this chapter to implement a regional transportation investment plan. For counties specified under RCW 36.120.030(1), the boundaries must be coextensive with two or more contiguous counties, except as provided in RCW 36.120.030(1), and for counties specified under RCW 36.120.030(2), the boundaries may be multicounty, county-wide, or less than county-wide; however, a city must be wholly inside or outside the boundaries of the district.
     (6) "Regional transportation investment district planning committee" or "planning committee" means the advisory committee created under RCW 36.120.030 to create and propose to county legislative authorities a regional transportation investment plan to develop, finance, and construct transportation projects.
     (7) "Regional transportation investment plan" or "plan" means a plan to develop, construct, and finance a transportation project or projects.
     (8)(a) "Transportation project" means((:
     (a) A capital improvement or improvements to a highway that has been designated, in whole or in part, as a highway of statewide significance, including an extension, that:
     (i) Adds a lane or new lanes to an existing state or federal highway; or
     (ii) Repairs or replaces a lane or lanes damaged by an event declared an emergency by the governor before January 1, 2002.
     (b) A capital improvement or improvements to all or a portion of a highway of statewide significance, including an extension, and may include the following associated multimodal capital improvements:
     (i) Approaches to highways of statewide significance;
     (ii) High-occupancy vehicle lanes;
     (iii) Flyover ramps;
     (iv) Park and ride lots;
     (v) Bus pullouts;
     (vi) Vans for vanpools;
     (vii) Buses; and
     (viii) Signalization, ramp metering, and other transportation system management improvements.
     (c) A capital improvement or improvements to all or a portion of a city street, county road, or existing highway or the creation of a new highway that intersects with a highway of statewide significance, if all of the following conditions are met:
     (i) The project is included in a plan that makes highway improvement projects that add capacity to a highway or highways of statewide significance;
     (ii) The secretary of transportation determines that the project would better relieve traffic congestion than investing that same money in adding capacity to a highway of statewide significance;
     (iii) Matching money equal to one-third of the total cost of the project is provided by local entities, including but not limited to a metropolitan planning organization, county, city, port, or private entity in which a county participating in a plan is located. Local entities may use federal grants to meet this matching requirement;
     (iv) In no case may the cumulative regional transportation investment district contribution to all projects constructed under this subsection (8)(c) exceed ten percent of the revenues generated by the district;
     (v) In no case may the cumulative regional transportation investment district contribution to all projects constructed under this subsection (8)(c) exceed one billion dollars; and
     (vi) The specific projects are included within the plan and submitted as part of the plan to a vote of the people.
     (d))) a project or program contained in the transportation plan of the state or of a regional transportation planning organization, including operations, preservation, and maintenance ((are excluded from this definition and may not be included in a regional transportation investment plan)) of the projects or programs.
     (b) "High-priority project" means the restoration, reconstruction, or improvement of a transportation facility of regional significance that has failed or is an identified risk for failure in terms of its design life expectancy or other factors.
     (9) "Weighted vote" means a vote that reflects the population each board or planning committee member represents relative to the population represented by the total membership of the board or planning committee. Population will be determined using the federal 2000 census or subsequent federal census data.

Sec. 3   RCW 36.120.030 and 2002 c 56 s 103 are each amended to read as follows:
     Regional transportation investment district planning committees are advisory entities that are created, convened, and empowered as follows:
     (1) A county with a population over one million five hundred thousand persons and any adjoining counties with a population over five hundred thousand persons may create a regional transportation investment district and shall convene a regional transportation investment district planning committee. Any portion of a county that is located on a peninsula and is connected to the other portion of the county by a bridge improved under the Public-Private Transportation Initiatives Act, chapter 47.46 RCW, in a county with a national park and a population of more than five hundred thousand persons and less than one million five hundred thousand persons may not be part of a regional transportation investment district. To proceed with developing a plan, including submission of a plan to county legislative authorities for placement on a ballot, at least two contiguous counties must be included in the plan.
     (2) For counties other than those counties specified in subsection (1) of this section, the county legislative authority may create a regional transportation investment district and shall convene a regional transportation investment planning committee. Counties may by resolution of each county's legislative authority create a district to include more than one county.
     (3) The members of the legislative authorities participating in planning under this chapter shall serve as the district planning committee. In addition, for counties planning under subsection (2) of this section, the planning committee must also include mayors or city council members of cities within the district so that the proportional membership on the planning committee in terms of members with weighted votes reflects the relative population of persons living within the respective jurisdictions. Members of the planning committee receive no compensation, but may be reimbursed for travel and incidental expenses as the planning committee deems appropriate.
     The secretary of transportation, or the appropriate regional administrator of the department, as named by the secretary, shall serve on the committee as a nonvoting member.
     (((3))) (4) A regional transportation investment district planning committee may be entitled to state funding, as appropriated by the legislature, for start-up funding to pay for salaries, expenses, overhead, supplies, and similar expenses ordinarily and necessarily incurred in selecting transportation projects and funding for those transportation projects under this chapter. Upon creation of a regional transportation investment district, the district shall within one year reimburse the state for any sums advanced for these start-up costs from the state.
     (((4))) (5) The planning committee shall conduct its affairs and formulate a regional transportation investment plan as provided under RCW 36.120.040, except that ((it)) planning committees for counties under subsection (1) of this section shall elect an executive board of seven members to discharge the duties of the planning committee and formulate a regional transportation investment plan, subject to the approval of the full committee.
     (((5))) (6) At its first meeting, a regional transportation investment district planning committee may elect officers and provide for the adoption of rules and other operating procedures.
     (((6))) (7) Governance of and decisions by a regional transportation investment district planning committee must be by a sixty-percent weighted majority vote of the total membership.
     (((7))) (8) The planning committee may dissolve itself at any time by a two-thirds weighted majority vote of the total membership of the planning committee.

Sec. 4   RCW 36.120.040 and 2003 c 194 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A regional transportation investment district planning committee shall adopt a regional transportation investment plan providing for the development, construction, and financing of transportation projects. The planning committee may consider the following factors in formulating its plan:
     (a) Land use planning criteria;
     (b) The input of cities located within a participating county; and
     (c) The input of regional transportation planning organizations in which a participating county is located. A regional transportation planning organization in which a participating county is located shall review its adopted regional transportation plan and submit, for the planning committee's consideration, its list of transportation improvement priorities.
     (2) The planning committee may coordinate its activities with the department, which shall provide services, data, and personnel to assist in this planning as desired by the planning committee. In addition, the planning committee may coordinate with affected cities, towns, and other local governments that engage in transportation planning.
     (3) In conducting its environmental impact statement responsibilities on the Alaskan Way Viaduct project, the department of transportation must provide briefings and consult with legislators in the affected project area on the design alternatives for that facility as a high-priority project.
     (4) The planning committee shall:
     (a) Conduct public meetings that are needed to assure active public participation in the development of the plan;
     (b) Adopt a plan proposing the:
     (i) Creation of a regional transportation investment district; and
     (ii) Construction of transportation projects to improve or maintain mobility within each county((. Operations, maintenance, and preservation of facilities or systems may not be part of the plan));
     (((c))) (d) Recommend sources of revenue authorized by RCW 36.120.050 and a financing plan to fund selected transportation projects. The overall plan of the district must leverage the district's financial contributions so that the federal, state, local, and other revenue sources continue to fund major congestion relief and ((transportation capacity)) mobility improvement projects in each county and the district. A combination of local, state, and federal revenues may be necessary to pay for transportation projects, and the planning committee shall consider all of these revenue sources in developing a plan.
     (((4))) (5) For counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), the plan must use tax revenues and related debt for projects that generally benefit a participating county in proportion to the general level of tax revenues generated within that participating county. This equity principle applies to all modifications to the plan, appropriation of contingency funds not identified within the project estimate, and future phases of the plan. During implementation of the plan, the board shall retain the flexibility to manage distribution of revenues, debt, and project schedules so that the district may effectively implement the plan. Nothing in this section should be interpreted to prevent the district from pledging district-wide tax revenues for payment of any contract or debt entered into under RCW 36.120.130.
     (((5))) (6) Before adopting the plan, the planning committee, with assistance from the department, shall work with the lead agency to develop accurate cost forecasts for transportation projects. This project costing methodology must be integrated with revenue forecasts in developing the plan and must at a minimum include estimated project costs in constant dollars as well as year of expenditure dollars, the range of project costs reflected by the level of project design, project contingencies, identification of mitigation costs, the range of revenue forecasts, and project and plan cash flow and bond analysis. The plan submitted to the voters must provide cost estimates for each project, including reasonable contingency costs. Plans submitted to the voters must provide that the maximum amount possible of the funds raised will be used to fund projects in the plan, including environmental improvements and mitigation, and that administrative costs be minimized. If actual revenue exceeds actual plan costs, the excess revenues must be used to retire any outstanding debt associated with the plan.
     (((6))) (7) For counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), if a county opts not to adopt the plan or participate in the regional transportation investment district, but two or more contiguous counties do choose to continue to participate, then the planning committee may, within ninety days, redefine the regional transportation investment plan and the ballot measure to be submitted to the people to reflect elimination of the county, and submit the redefined plan to the legislative authorities of the remaining counties for their decision as to whether to continue to adopt the redefined plan and participate. This action must be completed within sixty days after receipt of the redefined plan.
     (((7))) (8) Once adopted, the plan must be forwarded to the participating county legislative authority or authorities to initiate the election process under RCW 36.120.070. The planning committee shall at the same time provide notice to each city and town within the district, the governor, the chairs of the transportation committees of the legislature, the secretary of transportation, and each legislator whose legislative district is partially or wholly within the boundaries of the district.
     (((8))) (9) If the ballot measure is not approved, the planning committee may redefine the selected transportation projects, financing plan, and the ballot measure. The county legislative authority or authorities may approve the new plan and ballot measure, and may then submit the revised proposition to the voters at the next election or a special election. If no ballot measure is approved by the voters by the third vote, the planning committee is dissolved.

Sec. 5   RCW 36.120.050 and 2003 c 350 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A regional transportation investment district planning committee may, as part of a regional transportation investment plan, recommend the imposition of some or all of the following revenue sources, which a regional transportation investment district may impose upon approval of the voters as provided in this chapter:
     (a) A regional sales and use tax, as specified in RCW 82.14.430, of up to ((0.5)) 0.2 percent of the selling price, in the case of a sales tax, or value of the article used, in the case of a use tax, upon the occurrence of any taxable event in the regional transportation investment district. The proceeds of this tax may be spent only as follows:
     (i) 0.1 percent only for high-priority projects;
     (ii) 0.1 percent only for public transportation purposes, commute trip reduction programs, or high-priority projects, or a combination thereof;
     (b) A local option vehicle license fee, as specified under RCW 82.80.100, of up to one hundred dollars per vehicle registered in the district. As used in this subsection, "vehicle" means motor vehicle as defined in RCW 46.04.320. Certain classes of vehicles, as defined under chapter 46.04 RCW, may be exempted from this fee;
     (c) A parking tax under RCW 82.80.030;
     (d) A local motor vehicle excise tax under RCW 81.100.060 and chapter 81.104 RCW;
     (e) A local option fuel tax under RCW 82.80.120;
     (f) A mileage charge under section 16 of this act;
     (g) An employer excise tax under RCW 81.100.030; and
     (((g))) (h) With the approval of the transportation commission, or its successor, vehicle tolls on ((new or reconstructed facilities)) a local or regional arterial or state or federal highway within the boundaries of the district. The plan must identify the facilities to be tolled and the purpose of the toll. Unless otherwise specified by law or contract, the department shall administer the collection of vehicle tolls on designated facilities, and the state transportation commission, or its successor, shall be the tolling authority.
     (2) Taxes, fees, and tolls may not be imposed without an affirmative vote of the majority of the voters within the boundaries of the district voting on a ballot proposition as set forth in RCW 36.120.070. Revenues from these taxes and fees may be used only to implement the plan as set forth in this chapter. A district may contract with the state department of revenue or other appropriate entities for administration and collection of any of the taxes or fees authorized in this section. In authorizing these revenue sources, it is the intent of the legislature to provide a range of options that can be tailored to meet the transportation needs identified by local elected officials, with voter approval. The legislature does not intend that all local option tax sources will be used by a single district, nor that each revenue source will necessarily be imposed to its maximum limit.
     (3) Existing statewide motor vehicle fuel and special fuel taxes, at the distribution rates in effect on January 1, 2001, are not intended to be altered by this chapter.

Sec. 6   RCW 36.120.060 and 2002 c 56 s 106 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The planning committee shall consider the following criteria for selecting transportation projects to improve corridor performance:
     (a) Reduced level of congestion and improved safety;
     (b) Improved travel time;
     (c) Improved air quality;
     (d) Increases in daily and peak period person and vehicle trip capacity;
     (e) Reductions in person and vehicle delay;
     (f) Improved personal mobility;
     (g) Improved freight mobility; and
     (((g))) (h) Cost-effectiveness of the investment.
     (2) The planning committee shall develop and weight other criteria as necessary to ensure that high-priority projects are accomplished.
     (3) Funding provided by this act for the Alaskan Way Viaduct project as a high-priority project shall not be spent for preliminary engineering, design, right of way acquisition, or construction on the project if it could have the effect of reducing roadway capacity on that facility.
     (4) These criteria represent only minimum standards that must be considered in selecting transportation improvement projects. The board shall also consider rules and standards for benchmarks adopted by the transportation commission or its successor.

Sec. 7   RCW 36.120.070 and 2002 c 56 s 107 are each amended to read as follows:
     Two or more contiguous county legislative authorities under RCW 36.120.030(1) and a county or county legislative authorities under RCW 36.120.030(2), upon receipt of the regional transportation investment plan under RCW 36.120.040, may ((certify the plan to the ballot, including identification of the tax options)) submit to the voters of the proposed district a single ballot measure that approves formation of the district, approves the regional transportation investment plan, and approves the revenue sources necessary to ((fund)) finance the plan. ((County legislative authorities)) The planning committee may draft ((a ballot title,)) the ballot measure on behalf of the county legislative authorities, and the county legislative authorities may give notice as required by law for ballot measures, and perform other duties as required to ((put the plan before)) submit the measure to the voters of the proposed district for their approval or rejection ((as a single ballot measure that both approves formation of the district and approves the plan)). Counties may negotiate interlocal agreements necessary to implement the plan. The electorate will be the voters voting within the boundaries of the participating counties. A simple majority of the total persons voting on the single ballot measure ((to approve the plan, establish the district, and approve the taxes and fees)) is required for approval of the measure.

Sec. 8   RCW 36.120.090 and 2002 c 56 s 109 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The governing board of a district consists of the members of the legislative authority of each member county, acting ex officio and independently. The secretary of transportation or the appropriate regional administrator of the department, as named by the secretary, shall also serve as a nonvoting member of the board. For districts in counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), the governing board may elect an executive board of seven members to discharge the duties of the governing board subject to the approval of the full governing board.
     (2) A sixty-percent majority of the weighted votes of the total board membership is required to submit to the county or counties a modified plan under RCW 36.120.140 or any other proposal to be submitted to the voters. The county or counties may, with majority vote of each county legislative authority, submit a modified plan or proposal to the voters.

Sec. 9   RCW 36.120.140 and 2003 c 194 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The board may modify the plan to change transportation projects or revenue sources if:
     (a) For districts in counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), two or more participating counties adopt a resolution to modify the plan((;)) and
     (((b))) the counties submit to the voters in the district a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the plan, its projects, its schedule, its costs, or the revenue sources;
     (b) For districts in counties under RCW 36.120.030(2), the board adopts a resolution to modify the plan and the county or counties submit to the voters in the district a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the plan, its projects, its schedule, its costs, or the revenue sources.
     If the voters of either type of district fail to approve the redefined plan, the district shall continue to work on and complete the plan, and the projects in it, that was originally approved by the voters. If the voters approve the redefined plan, the district shall work on and complete the projects under the redefined plan.
     (2) The board may modify the plan to change transportation projects within a participating county if:
     (a) A majority of the board approves the change;
     (b) The modifications are limited to projects within the county;
     (c) The county submits to the voters in the county a ballot measure that redefines:
     (i) Projects;
     (ii) Scopes of projects; or
     (iii) Costs; and
     (iv) The financial plan for the county;
     (d) The proposed modifications maintain the equity of the plan and ((does [do])) do not increase the total level of plan expenditure for the county.
     If the voters fail to approve the modified plan, the district shall continue to work on and complete the plan, and the projects in it, that was originally approved by the voters. If the voters approve the redefined plan, the district shall work on and complete the projects under the redefined plan.
     (3) If a transportation project cost exceeds its original cost by more than twenty percent as identified in the plan:
     (a) The board shall, in coordination with the county legislative authorities, submit to the voters in the district or county a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the transportation project, its schedule, or its costs. If the voters fail to approve the redefined transportation project, the district shall terminate work on that transportation project, except that the district may take reasonable steps to use, preserve, or connect any improvement already constructed. The remainder of any funds that would otherwise have been expended on the terminated transportation project must first be used to retire any outstanding debt attributable to the plan and then may be used to implement the remainder of the plan.
     (b) Alternatively for districts in counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), upon adoption of a resolution by two or more participating counties:
     (i) The counties shall submit to the voters in the district a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the plan, its transportation projects, its schedule, or its costs. If the voters fail to approve the redefined plan, the district shall terminate work on that plan, except that the district may take reasonable steps to use, preserve, or connect any improvement already constructed. The remainder of any funds must be used to retire any outstanding debt attributable to the plan; or
     (ii) The counties may elect to have the district continue the transportation project without submitting an additional ballot proposal to the voters.
     (4) To assure accountability to the public for the timely construction of the transportation improvement project or projects within cost projections, the district shall issue a report, at least annually, to the public and copies of the report to newspapers of record in the district. In the report, the district shall indicate the status of transportation project costs, transportation project expenditures, revenues, and construction schedules. The report may also include progress towards meeting the performance criteria provided under this chapter.

Sec. 10   RCW 36.120.190 and 2002 c 56 s 201 are each amended to read as follows:
     For districts in counties under RCW 36.120.030(1), at the option of the planning committee, and with the explicit approval of the regional transit authority, the participating counties may choose to impose any remaining high capacity transportation taxes under chapter 81.104 RCW that have not otherwise been used by a regional transit authority and submit to the voters a common ballot measure that creates the district, approves the regional transportation investment plan, implements the taxes, and implements any remaining high capacity transportation taxes within the boundaries of the regional transportation investment district. Collection and expenditures of any high capacity transportation taxes implemented under this section must be determined by agreement between the participating counties or district and the regional transit authority electing to submit high capacity transportation taxes to the voters under a common ballot measure as provided in this section. If the measure fails, all such unused high capacity transportation taxes revert back to and remain with the regional transit authority. A project constructed with this funding is not considered a "transportation project" under RCW 36.120.020.

Sec. 11   RCW 36.120.200 and 2002 c 56 s 401 are each amended to read as follows:
     The regional transportation investment district account is created in the custody of the state treasurer. The purpose of this account is to act as an account into which may be deposited state money, if any, that may be used in conjunction with district money to fund transportation projects. Additionally, ((the)) districts may deposit funds into this account for disbursement, as appropriate, on transportation projects. Nothing in this section requires any state matching money. All money deposited in the regional transportation investment district account will be used for design, right of way acquisition, capital acquisition, and construction, or for the payment of debt service associated with these activities, for regionally funded transportation projects developed under this chapter. Only the district may authorize expenditures from the account. The account is subject to allotment procedures under chapter 43.88 RCW. An appropriation is not required for expenditures from this account.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12   A new section is added to chapter 36.120 RCW to read as follows:
     Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this chapter, a regional transportation investment district may impose vehicle tolls on local and regional arterials with the approval of the transportation commission, or its successor, and upon approval of a majority of the voters voting on a regional transportation investment plan ballot measure within its boundaries as authorized in this chapter. These tolls may be imposed to generate revenue to fund the regional transportation investment plan.

Sec. 13   RCW 47.56.076 and 2002 c 56 s 403 are each amended to read as follows:
     With the approval of the transportation commission, or its successor, and upon approval of a majority of the voters within its boundaries voting on the ballot proposition, and only for the purposes authorized in RCW 36.120.050(1)(((f))) (h), a regional transportation investment district may impose vehicle tolls on a state ((routes where improvements financed in whole or in part by a regional transportation investment district add additional lanes to, or reconstruct lanes on, a highway of statewide significance)) or federal highway within the boundaries of the district. The department shall administer the collection of vehicle tolls on designated facilities unless otherwise specified in law or by contract, and the state transportation commission, or its successor, shall ((be the tolling authority)) set and impose the tolls in amounts sufficient to implement the regional transportation investment plan.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14   A new section is added to chapter 47.56 RCW to read as follows:
     Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this chapter, a regional transportation investment district may impose vehicle tolls on either Lake Washington bridge upon approval of a majority of the voters voting on a regional transportation investment plan ballot measure within its boundaries as authorized in chapter 36.120 RCW and RCW 47.56.076.

Sec. 15   RCW 82.14.430 and 2002 c 56 s 405 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) If approved by the majority of the voters within its boundaries voting on the ballot proposition, a regional transportation investment district may impose a sales and use tax of up to ((0.5)) 0.2 percent of the selling price or value of the article used in the case of a use tax. The tax authorized by this section is in addition to the tax authorized by RCW 82.14.030 and must be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the taxing district. Motor vehicles are exempt from the sales and use tax imposed under this subsection.
     (2) If approved by the majority of the voters within its boundaries voting on the ballot proposition, a regional transportation investment district may impose a tax on the use of a motor vehicle within a regional transportation investment district. The tax applies to those persons who reside within the regional transportation investment district. The rate of the tax may not exceed ((0.5)) 0.2 percent of the value of the motor vehicle. The tax authorized by this subsection is in addition to the tax authorized under RCW 82.14.030 and must be imposed and collected at the time a taxable event under RCW 82.08.020(1) or 82.12.020 takes place. All revenue received under this subsection must be deposited in the local sales and use tax account and distributed to the regional transportation investment district according to RCW 82.14.050. The following provisions apply to the use tax in this subsection:
     (a) Where persons are taxable under chapter 82.08 RCW, the seller shall collect the use tax from the buyer using the collection provisions of RCW 82.08.050.
     (b) Where persons are taxable under chapter 82.12 RCW, the use tax must be collected using the provisions of RCW 82.12.045.
     (c) "Motor vehicle" has the meaning provided in RCW 46.04.320, but does not include farm tractors or farm vehicles as defined in RCW 46.04.180 and 46.04.181, off-road and nonhighway vehicles as defined in RCW 46.09.020, and snowmobiles as defined in RCW 46.10.010.
     (d) "Person" has the meaning given in RCW 82.04.030.
     (e) The value of a motor vehicle must be determined under RCW 82.12.010.
     (f) Except as specifically stated in this subsection (2), chapters 82.12 and 82.32 RCW apply to the use tax. The use tax is a local tax imposed under the authority of chapter 82.14 RCW, and chapter 82.14 RCW applies fully to the use tax.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16   A new section is added to chapter 82.80 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The legislative authority of a regional transportation investment district may impose a charge based upon vehicle miles traveled. This charge may be, but is not limited to, a charge upon the vehicle miles traveled within the district by a vehicle, upon vehicle miles traveled within certain corridors in the district, or upon total vehicle miles traveled by a vehicle registered to a person whose legal residence is within the district.
     (2) Charges imposed may be collected either periodically in a manner prescribed by the district or annually by the department of licensing upon renewal of the vehicle license. The district may identify categories of miles driven that are subject to or exempt from the charge, including but not limited to, travel outside the district, travel in specified corridors, or exempt or maximum mileage charges.
     (3) The mileage charge under this section is subject to the approval of the transportation commission or its statutory successor and of a majority of the voters within the district boundaries voting on formation of the district. The mileage charge must be part of the investment plan of the district.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 17   If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.