BILL REQ. #:  S-3705.1 



_____________________________________________ 

SENATE BILL 6273
_____________________________________________
State of Washington58th Legislature2004 Regular Session

By Senators Keiser, Winsley, Thibaudeau and Kohl-Welles

Read first time 01/15/2004.   Referred to Committee on Health & Long-Term Care.



     AN ACT Relating to regulating hospitals and health professions; amending RCW 70.41.210, 70.41.200, and 18.130.160; adding a new section to chapter 70.41 RCW; and prescribing penalties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   A new section is added to chapter 70.41 RCW to read as follows:
     Hospitals shall post copies of a notice, specified by and furnished by the department of health, advising of the whistleblower protections afforded in RCW 43.70.075 for reporting concerns about improper quality of care provided by health care professionals, in conspicuous places on its premises where notices to affected employees are usually posted.

Sec. 2   RCW 70.41.210 and 1994 sp.s. c 9 s 743 are each amended to read as follows:
     The chief administrator or executive officer of a hospital shall report to the medical quality assurance commission when a physician's clinical privileges are terminated or are restricted based on a determination, in accordance with an institution's bylaws, that a physician has either committed an act or acts which may constitute unprofessional conduct. The officer shall also report if a physician accepts voluntary termination in order to foreclose or terminate actual or possible hospital action to suspend, restrict, or terminate a physician's clinical privileges. Such a report shall be made within sixty days of the date action was taken by the hospital's peer review committee or the physician's acceptance of voluntary termination or restriction of privileges. Failure of a hospital to comply with this section is punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred ((fifty)) dollars.

Sec. 3   RCW 70.41.200 and 2000 c 6 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Every hospital shall maintain a coordinated quality improvement program for the improvement of the quality of health care services rendered to patients and the identification and prevention of medical malpractice. The program shall include at least the following:
     (a) The establishment of a quality improvement committee with the responsibility to review the services rendered in the hospital, both retrospectively and prospectively, in order to improve the quality of medical care of patients and to prevent medical malpractice. The committee shall oversee and coordinate the quality improvement and medical malpractice prevention program and shall ensure that information gathered pursuant to the program is used to review and to revise hospital policies and procedures;
     (b) A medical staff privileges sanction procedure through which credentials, physical and mental capacity, and competence in delivering health care services are periodically reviewed as part of an evaluation of staff privileges;
     (c) A review of the physical and mental capacity and competence in delivering health care services of all persons with medical staff privileges must be conducted whenever those credentials are terminated, allowed to lapse, or surrendered for any reason. This review must include a specific recommendation to the hospital regarding language to be used in replying to another facility's request for a recommendation.
     (d)
The periodic review of the credentials, physical and mental capacity, and competence in delivering health care services of all persons who are employed or associated with the hospital;
     (((d))) (e) A procedure for the prompt resolution of grievances by patients or their representatives related to accidents, injuries, treatment, and other events that may result in claims of medical malpractice;
     (((e))) (f) The maintenance and continuous collection of information concerning the hospital's experience with negative health care outcomes and incidents injurious to patients, patient grievances, professional liability premiums, settlements, awards, costs incurred by the hospital for patient injury prevention, and safety improvement activities;
     (((f))) (g) The maintenance of relevant and appropriate information gathered pursuant to (a) through (((e))) (f) of this subsection concerning individual physicians within the physician's personnel or credential file maintained by the hospital;
     (((g))) (h) Education programs dealing with quality improvement, patient safety, injury prevention, staff responsibility to report professional misconduct, the legal aspects of patient care, improved communication with patients, and causes of malpractice claims for staff personnel engaged in patient care activities; and
     (((h))) (i) Policies to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements of this section.
     (2) Any person who, in substantial good faith, provides information to further the purposes of the quality improvement and medical malpractice prevention program or who, in substantial good faith, participates on the quality improvement committee shall not be subject to an action for civil damages or other relief as a result of such activity.
     (3) Information and documents, including complaints and incident reports, created specifically for, and collected, and maintained by a quality improvement committee are not subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action, and no person who was in attendance at a meeting of such committee or who participated in the creation, collection, or maintenance of information or documents specifically for the committee shall be permitted or required to testify in any civil action as to the content of such proceedings or the documents and information prepared specifically for the committee. This subsection does not preclude: (a) In any civil action, the discovery of the identity of persons involved in the medical care that is the basis of the civil action whose involvement was independent of any quality improvement activity; (b) in any civil action, the testimony of any person concerning the facts which form the basis for the institution of such proceedings of which the person had personal knowledge acquired independently of such proceedings; (c) in any civil action by a health care provider regarding the restriction or revocation of that individual's clinical or staff privileges, introduction into evidence information collected and maintained by quality improvement committees regarding such health care provider; (d) in any civil action, disclosure of the fact that staff privileges were terminated or restricted, including the specific restrictions imposed, if any and the reasons for the restrictions; or (e) in any civil action, discovery and introduction into evidence of the patient's medical records required by regulation of the department of health to be made regarding the care and treatment received.
     (4) Each quality improvement committee shall, on at least a semiannual basis, report to the governing board of the hospital in which the committee is located. The report shall review the quality improvement activities conducted by the committee, and any actions taken as a result of those activities.
     (5) The department of health shall adopt such rules as are deemed appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this section.
     (6) The medical quality assurance commission or the board of osteopathic medicine and surgery, as appropriate, may review and audit the records of committee decisions in which a physician's privileges are terminated or restricted. Each hospital shall produce and make accessible to the commission or board the appropriate records and otherwise facilitate the review and audit. Information so gained shall not be subject to the discovery process and confidentiality shall be respected as required by subsection (3) of this section. Failure of a hospital to comply with this subsection is punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars.
     (7) The department, the joint commission on accreditation of health care organizations, and any other accrediting organization may review and audit the records of a quality improvement committee or peer review committee in connection with their inspection and review of hospitals. Information so obtained shall not be subject to the discovery process, and confidentiality shall be respected as required by subsection (3) of this section. Each hospital shall produce and make accessible to the department the appropriate records and otherwise facilitate the review and audit.
     (8) Violation of this section shall not be considered negligence per se.

Sec. 4   RCW 18.130.160 and 2001 c 195 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     Upon a finding, after hearing, that a license holder or applicant has committed unprofessional conduct or is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety due to a physical or mental condition, the disciplining authority may consider the imposition of sanctions, taking into account the department's and the license holder's or applicant's arguments, and issue an order providing for one or any combination of the following:
     (1) Revocation of the license;
     (2) Suspension of the license for a fixed or indefinite term;
     (3) Restriction or limitation of the practice;
     (4) Requiring the satisfactory completion of a specific program of remedial education or treatment;
     (5) The monitoring of the practice by a supervisor approved by the disciplining authority;
     (6) Censure or reprimand;
     (7) Compliance with conditions of probation for a designated period of time;
     (8) Payment of a fine for each violation of this chapter, not to exceed five thousand dollars per violation. Funds received shall be placed in the health professions account;
     (9) Denial of the license request;
     (10) Corrective action;
     (11) Refund of fees billed to and collected from the consumer;
     (12) A surrender of the practitioner's license in lieu of other sanctions, which must be reported to the federal data bank.
     Any of the actions under this section may be totally or partly stayed by the disciplining authority. In determining what action is appropriate, the disciplining authority must first consider what sanctions are necessary to protect or compensate the public. Only after such provisions have been made may the disciplining authority consider and include in the order requirements designed to rehabilitate the license holder or applicant. All costs associated with compliance with orders issued under this section are the obligation of the license holder or applicant.
     The licensee or applicant may enter into a stipulated disposition of charges that includes one or more of the sanctions of this section, but only after a statement of charges has been issued and the licensee has been afforded the opportunity for a hearing and has elected on the record to forego such a hearing. The stipulation shall either contain one or more specific findings of unprofessional conduct or inability to practice, or a statement by the licensee acknowledging that evidence is sufficient to justify one or more specified findings of unprofessional conduct or inability to practice. The stipulation entered into pursuant to this subsection shall be considered formal disciplinary action for all purposes.

--- END ---