1650-S AMH DARN LEAT 056

 

 

 

 

SHB 1650 - H AMD

By Representative Darneille

 

 

   On page 1, strike everything after the enacting clause and insert

 

   "Sec. 1. RCW 46.61.021 and 1997 1st sp.s. c 1 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) Any person requested or signaled to stop by a law enforcement officer for a traffic infraction has a duty to stop.

   (2) Whenever any person is stopped for a traffic infraction, the officer may detain that person for a reasonable period of time necessary to identify the person, check for outstanding warrants, check the status of the person's license, insurance identification card, and the vehicle's registration, and complete and issue a notice of traffic infraction.

   (3) Any person requested to identify himself or herself to a law enforcement officer pursuant to an investigation of a traffic infraction has a duty to identify himself or herself, give his or her current address, and sign an acknowledgement of receipt of the notice of infraction. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 2. RCW 46.63.060 and 1993 c 501 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) A notice of traffic infraction represents a determination that an infraction has been committed. The determination will be final unless contested as provided in this chapter.

   (2) The form for the notice of traffic infraction shall be prescribed by rule of the supreme court and shall include the following:

   (a) A statement that the notice represents a determination that a traffic infraction has been committed by the person named in the notice and that the determination shall be final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (b) A statement that a traffic infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment may not be imposed as a sanction; that the penalty for a traffic infraction may include sanctions against the person's driver's license including suspension, revocation, or denial; that the penalty for a traffic infraction related to standing, stopping, or parking may include nonrenewal of the vehicle license;

   (c) A statement of the specific traffic infraction for which the notice was issued;

   (d) A statement of the monetary penalty established for the traffic infraction;

   (e) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (f) A statement that at any hearing to contest the determination the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infraction was committed; and that the person may subpoena witnesses including the officer who issued the notice of infraction;

   (g) A statement that at any hearing requested for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances surrounding the commission of the infraction the person will be deemed to have committed the infraction and may not subpoena witnesses;

   (h) A statement that the person must respond to the notice as provided in this chapter within fifteen days or the person's driver's license or driving privilege will be suspended by the department until any penalties imposed pursuant to this chapter have been satisfied;

   (i) A statement that failure to appear at a hearing requested for the purpose of contesting the determination or for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances will result in the suspension of the person's driver's license or driving privilege, or in the case of a standing, stopping, or parking violation, refusal of the department to renew the vehicle license, until any penalties imposed pursuant to this chapter have been satisfied; and

   (j) A statement, which the person shall sign, that the person promises to respond to the notice of infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 3. RCW 46.64.025 and 1999 c 86 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

   Whenever any person ((violates his or her written promise to appear in court, or)) served with a traffic citation fails to appear for a scheduled court hearing, the court in which the defendant failed to appear shall promptly give notice of such fact to the department of licensing. Whenever thereafter the case in which the defendant failed to appear is adjudicated, the court hearing the case shall promptly file with the department a certificate showing that the case has been adjudicated.

 

   Sec. 4. RCW 7.80.070 and 1987 c 456 s 15 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) A notice of civil infraction represents a determination that a civil infraction has been committed. The determination is final unless contested as provided in this chapter.

   (2) The form for the notice of civil infraction shall be prescribed by rule of the supreme court and shall include the following:

   (a) A statement that the notice represents a determination that a civil infraction has been committed by the person named in the notice and that the determination is final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (b) A statement that a civil infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment may not be imposed as a sanction;

   (c) A statement of the specific civil infraction for which the notice was issued;

   (d) A statement of the monetary penalty established for the civil infraction;

   (e) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (f) A statement that at any hearing to contest the determination the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the civil infraction was committed and that the person may subpoena witnesses including the enforcement officer who issued the notice of civil infraction;

   (g) A statement that at any hearing requested for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances surrounding the commission of the civil infraction, the person will be deemed to have committed the civil infraction and may not subpoena witnesses;

   (h) A statement that the person must respond to the notice as provided in this chapter within fifteen days;

   (i) A statement that failure to respond to the notice or a failure to appear at a hearing requested for the purpose of contesting the determination or for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances will result in a default judgment against the person in the amount of the penalty and that this failure may be referred to the prosecuting attorney for criminal prosecution for failure to respond or appear;

   (j) A statement, which the person shall sign, that the person promises to respond to the notice of civil infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of civil infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail; and

   (k) A statement that failure to respond to a notice of civil infraction ((as promised)) or to appear at a requested hearing is a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine or imprisonment in jail.

 

   Sec. 5. RCW 7.80.160 and 2002 c 175 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) A person who fails to sign a notice of civil infraction is guilty of a misdemeanor. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of civil infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

   (2) Any person who willfully ((violating his or her written and signed promise to appear in court or his or her written and signed promise)) fails to respond to a notice of civil infraction is guilty of a misdemeanor regardless of the disposition of the notice of civil infraction. A ((written promise to appear in court or a written promise to respond to a)) notice of civil infraction may be complied with by an appearance by counsel.

   (3) A person who willfully fails to pay a monetary penalty or to perform community restitution as required by a court under this chapter may be found in contempt of court as provided in chapter 7.21 RCW.

 

   Sec. 6. RCW 7.84.050 and 1987 c 380 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) A notice of infraction represents a determination that an infraction has been committed. The determination shall be final unless contested as provided in this chapter.

   (2) The form for the notice of infraction shall be prescribed by rule of the supreme court and shall include the following:

   (a) A statement that the notice represents a determination that an infraction has been committed by the person named in the notice and that the determination shall be final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (b) A statement that an infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment will not be imposed as a sanction;

   (c) A statement of the specific infraction for which the notice was issued;

   (d) A statement of the monetary penalty established for the infraction;

   (e) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (f) A statement that at any hearing to contest the determination, the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infraction was committed; and that the person may subpoena witnesses including the officer who issued the notice of infraction;

   (g) A statement that at any hearing requested for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances surrounding the commission of the infraction the person shall be deemed to have committed the infraction and shall not subpoena witnesses;

   (h) A statement that failure to respond to a notice of infraction within fifteen days is a misdemeanor and may be punished by fine or imprisonment;

   (i) A statement that failure to appear at a hearing requested for the purpose of contesting the determination or for the purpose of explaining mitigating circumstances is a misdemeanor and may be punished by fine or imprisonment; and

   (j) A statement, which the person shall sign, that the person promises to respond to the notice of infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 7. RCW 18.27.240 and 1986 c 197 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

   The form of the notice of infraction issued under this chapter shall include the following:

   (1) A statement that the notice represents a determination that the infraction has been committed by the contractor named in the notice and that the determination shall be final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (2) A statement that the infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment shall not be imposed as a sanction;

   (3) A statement of the specific violation which necessitated issuance of the infraction;

   (4) A statement of penalty involved if the infraction is established;

   (5) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (6) A statement that at any hearing to contest the notice of infraction the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infraction was committed; and that the contractor may subpoena witnesses, including the compliance inspector of the department who issued and served the notice of infraction;

   (7) A statement, which the person who has been served with the notice of infraction shall sign, that the contractor ((promises to)) must respond to the notice of infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter. The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail;

   (8) A statement that refusal to sign the infraction as directed in subsection (7) of this section is a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine or imprisonment in jail; and

   (9) A statement that a contractor's willful failure to respond to a notice of infraction ((as promised)) is a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine or imprisonment in jail.

   The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 8. RCW 18.106.190 and 1994 c 174 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

   The form of the notice of infraction issued under this chapter shall include the following:

   (1) A statement that the notice represents a determination that the infraction has been committed by the person named in the notice and that the determination shall be final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (2) A statement that the infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment shall not be imposed as a sanction;

   (3) A statement of the specific infraction for which the notice was issued;

   (4) A statement of the monetary penalty that has been established for the infraction;

   (5) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (6) A statement that at any hearing to contest the determination the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infraction was committed; and that the person may subpoena witnesses, including the authorized representative of the department who issued and served the notice of infraction;

   (7) A statement, which the person shall sign, that the person promises to respond to the notice of infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter;

   (8) A statement that refusal to sign the infraction as directed in subsection (7) of this section is a misdemeanor; and

   (9) A statement that willful failure to respond to a notice of infraction as promised is a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine or imprisonment in jail.

   The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 9. RCW 20.01.482 and 2004 c 43 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) The director shall have the authority to issue a notice of civil infraction if an infraction is committed in his or her presence or, if after investigation, the director has reasonable cause to believe an infraction has been committed.

   (2) It is a misdemeanor for any person to refuse to properly identify himself or herself for the purpose of issuance of a notice of infraction ((or to refuse to sign the written or electronic promise to appear or respond to a notice of infraction)).

   (3) Any person willfully ((violating a written or electronic and signed promise)) failing to respond to a notice of infraction is guilty of a misdemeanor regardless of the disposition of the notice of infraction.

 

   Sec. 10. RCW 43.63B.140 and 1994 c 284 s 26 are each amended to read as follows:

   (1) The department shall prescribe the form of the notice of infraction issued under this chapter.

   (2) The notice of infraction shall include the following:

   (a) A statement that the notice represents a determination that the infraction has been committed by the person named in the notice and that the determination is final unless contested as provided in this chapter;

   (b) A statement that the infraction is a noncriminal offense for which imprisonment may not be imposed as a sanction;

   (c) A statement of the specific infraction for which the notice was issued;

   (d) A statement of a monetary penalty that has been established for the infraction;

   (e) A statement of the options provided in this chapter for responding to the notice and the procedures necessary to exercise these options;

   (f) A statement that, at a hearing to contest the determination, the state has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infraction was committed, and that the person may subpoena witnesses including the authorized representative who issued and served the notice of the infraction;

   (g) A statement, that the person shall sign, that the person promises to respond to the notice of infraction in one of the ways provided in this chapter;

   (h) A statement that refusal to sign the infraction as directed in (g) of this subsection is a misdemeanor; and

   (i) A statement that willful failure to respond to a notice of infraction as promised is a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine or imprisonment in jail.

   The requirement for a signature does not apply when the person is served with a notice of infraction that is created by electronic means or served by mail.

 

   Sec. 11. RCW 81.112.230 and 1999 c 20 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

   Nothing in RCW 81.112.020 and 81.112.210 through 81.112.230 shall be deemed to prevent law enforcement authorities from prosecuting for theft, trespass, or other charges by any individual who:

   (1) Fails to pay the required fare on more than one occasion within a twelve-month period;

   (2) Fails to ((sign)) respond to a notice of civil infraction; or

   (3) Fails to depart the train, including but not limited to commuter trains and light rail trains, when requested to do so by a person designated to monitor fare payment.

 

   NEW SECTION:   Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 46.63 RCW to read as follows:

   (1) A person under whose name a notice of infraction has been issued has the right to challenge whether such infraction was issued to him or her.

   (2) For the purposes of such a challenge (a) a sworn statement completed by the challenging person; or (b) testimony in open court by the challenging person, stating that he or she was not the person who was the subject of the infraction, shall be prima facie evidence that the challenging person is not the person who committed the alleged infraction."

 

   Correct the title

 

 

 

EFFECT: Corrects a technical error by incorporating the text of the statutes referenced. Clarifies that a person who is issued a notice of infraction may challenge whether the signature on the notice is his or hers. Establishes that a sworn statement or testimony in open court by the challenging person is prima facie evidence that the challenging person is not the person who committed the infraction.