HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1034
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to the administrative supervision of financially distressed insurers.
Brief Description: Conducting the administrative supervision of financially distressed insurers.
Sponsors: By Representatives Kirby, Roach and Simpson; by request of Insurance Commissioner.
Brief History:
Financial Institutions & Insurance: 1/20/05, 2/1/05 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/9/05, 96-0.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 4/11/05, 42-0.
House Concurred.
Passed House: 4/18/05, 95-0.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Kirby, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Tom, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse, Santos, Schual-Berke, Serben, Simpson and Williams.
Staff: Jon Hedegard (786-7127).
Background:
The Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) oversees the regulation of insurance in
Washington. An important regulatory responsibility of the Commissioner is the monitoring
the solvency of insurance companies and health carriers. The monitoring is achieved by the
use of risk assessment formulas and various financial reporting requirements. If certain
criteria are met, the Commissioner can apply for a court order for rehabilitation or liquidation
of a domestic insurer (an insurer formed under the laws of Washington).
For the purpose of chapter 48.31 RCW ("Mergers, Rehabilitation, Liquidation"), "insurer"
includes life insurers, disability, property insurers, casualty insurers, vehicle insurers, title
insurers, surety bonding companies, insurers or companies offering charitable gift annuities.
Summary of Bill:
The Commissioner is given the ability to place an insurer under administrative supervision.
An insurer under administrative supervision is subject to greater scrutiny. The insurer may be
required to receive prior approval from the Insurance Commissioner or the appointed
administrative supervisor before taking certain actions.
When an insurer may be put under administrative supervision.
The Commissioner may place an insurer under administrative supervision if the
Commissioner makes a finding that:
When an Insurer exceeded its powers.
An insurer has "exceeded its powers" if it:
Impact of Administrative Supervision.
The Commissioner must adopt standards and procedures to maintain orderly continuation of
the operations of an insurer under administrative supervision. The Commissioner may
prevent an insurer from doing any of the following things without the prior approval of the
Commissioner or the appointed supervisor:
Insurer's Right to Administrative Hearing.
Any action or failure to act by the Commissioner is subject to chapter 48.04 and chapter
34.05 RCW. An insurer may contest an action of an administrative supervisor. If denied
after reconsideration, the insurer can request a proceeding under chapter 48.04 and chapter
34.05 RCW.
Other Provisions.
Administrative supervisors are added to the persons receiving immunity.
Exemptions from public disclosure and disclosure in civil actions are created for actions
related to the administrative supervision of an insurer. The Commissioner may open
proceedings or make information public if the Commissioner deems it to be in the best
interest of the insurer, its insureds or creditors, or the general public. The Commissioner's
decision to disclose any confidential materials is subject to applicable law.
The Commissioner is not prevented from beginning liquidation or rehabilitation proceedings
in addition to administrative supervision.
The Commissioner may adopt rules to implement this Act.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The bill is a 1989 model act from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Nineteen states have adopted the model. Why pursue a 1989 model act in 2005? We have seen four companies go into receivership since 1999. The four companies offered different products. Their troubles were not due to the type of market they were in. In all four of the companies, we saw problems long before they went into receivership. We saw signs of financial deterioration for years. The Insurance Commissioner could not take action though. We feel the bill gives us the opportunity to aid the company before it has to go into receivership. Their officers are left in place and all of the proceedings are confidential. It is a step before receivership. Under this bill, we could take action more quickly. We could make sure that the insurer does not take actions that lead to receivership.
Testimony With Concerns: We support the concept but have some concerns about the actual words used. In section 3, subsection (1)( c), it cites "failure to comply with the insurance code." This could allow the imposition of administrative supervision for one time, minor code violations. In section 5, the authority over activities looks like it could be burdensome and costly for an insurer to get their desired actions approved. This may be the model language, we need to check on that.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Mary Clogston and Jim Odiorne, Office of the Insurance
Commissioner.
(With concerns) Cliff Webster, American Insurance Association.