HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1071
As Reported by House Committee On:
Health Care
Title: An act relating to the uniform disciplinary act for health professions.
Brief Description: Concerning the uniform disciplinary act for health professions.
Sponsors: Representatives Campbell and Morrell.
Brief History:
Health Care: 2/4/05, 2/25/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Campbell, Vice Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Appleton, Clibborn, Green, Lantz and Moeller.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Bailey, Ranking Minority Member; Curtis, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Condotta, Hinkle, Schual-Berke and Skinner.
Staff: Chris Blake (786-7392).
Background:
The Uniform Disciplinary Act (UDA) governs disciplinary actions for all 57 categories of
credentialed health care providers. The UDA defines acts of unprofessional conduct,
establishes sanctions for such acts, and provides general procedures for addressing
complaints and taking disciplinary actions against a credentialed health care provider.
Responsibilities in the disciplinary process are divided between the Secretary of Health
(Secretary) and the 16 health profession boards and commissions according to the profession
that the health care provider is a member of and the relevant step in the disciplinary process.
After investigating a complaint or report of unprofessional conduct, the Secretary or the
board or commission must decide what disciplinary action is warranted by the evidence. The
case may be closed without further action, pursued through an informal action in the form of
a statement of allegations, or pursued through a formal action in the form of a statement of
charges.
Upon a finding of an act of unprofessional conduct, the Secretary or the board or commission
decides which sanctions should be ordered. These sanctions include: revocation of a license,
suspension of a license, restriction of the practice, mandatory remedial education or
treatment, monitoring of the practice, censure or reprimand, conditions of probation, payment
of a fine, denial of a license request, corrective action, refund of billings, and surrender of the
license. In the selection of a sanction the first consideration is what is necessary to protect or
compensate the public, and the second consideration is what may rehabilitate the license
holder or applicant.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Secretary must establish a work group which may consist of representatives of the
various health professions and health profession boards and commissions. The work group
must review the complaint processing and sanction determination phases of the health
professions disciplinary process. By December 1, 2005, the work group must provide
recommendations to the Legislature for creating greater efficiency in the processing of
complaints and consistency in sanctioning, including specific ranges of sanctions for acts of
unprofessional conduct and associated aggravating and mitigating factors.
Any combination of three unrelated orders for the following acts of unprofessional conduct
within a 10-year period shall result in the permanent revocation of the license:
A one-time finding of specified mitigating circumstance may be issued to excuse one of the violations when the disciplining authority determines that there is either strong potential for rehabilitation of the license holder or strong potential that remedial education and training for the license holder will prevent future harm to the public. A finding of mitigating circumstances may be issued as many times as the disciplining authority determines that the act at issue involved a high-risk procedure without any lower-risk alternatives, the patient was aware of the procedure's risks, and the health care provider took remedial steps prior to the disciplinary action.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill changes the requirement that a license be automatically revoked after three
findings of unprofessional conduct to an automatic revocation for three unrelated orders for
acts of unprofessional conduct. Violations of orders or stipulations of the disciplining
authority count toward the automatic license revocation penalty. The ten year period begins
upon completion of all conditions and obligations for the violation. Those who have had
their license automatically revoked may not petition for reinstatement.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: There is significant variation in the number of actions taken by different
health profession boards and commissions. There must be standards to ensure that those who
are not practicing professionally are sanctioned.
(With concerns) This bill may force cases to go to hearings because nobody would want to
have a strike against them.
Testimony Against: A one size fits all sentencing guideline should not be mandated. There is not enough clarity around the definition of a finding.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Campbell, prime sponsor; and Laura
Groshong, Washington State Society for Clinical Social Work and Washington State
Coalition of Mental Health Professionals and Consumers.
(With concerns) Ann Tan Piazza, Washington State Nurses Association; and Linda Hull,
Washington State Dental Association.
(Opposed) Andy Dolan, Washington State Medical Association.