HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1091
As Reported by House Committee On:
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade
Title: An act relating to providing additional funding for the community economic revitalization board's programs.
Brief Description: Providing additional funding for the Community Economic Revitalization Board's programs.
Sponsors: Representatives Linville, Newhouse, Flannigan, Grant, McCoy, Chase, Morrell and Kilmer; by request of Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development.
Brief History:
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade: 1/25/05, 2/2/05 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURE & TRADE
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 23 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Pettigrew, Vice Chair; Kristiansen, Ranking Minority Member; Skinner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Buri, Chase, Clibborn, Condotta, Dunn, Grant, Haler, Holmquist, Kenney, Kilmer, Kretz, McCoy, Morrell, Newhouse, Quall, Strow, P. Sullivan and Wallace.
Staff: Tracey Taylor (786-7196).
Background:
The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) program was created in 1982 to
provide direct low-interest loans and grants to counties, cities and special purpose districts for
economic development-related infrastructure improvements. The CERB financing is
available for public improvements that include the acquisition, construction, or repair of:
The CERB financing must be necessary to either bring a new business into a community, or expand or retain an existing business that is already located in the community.
Summary of Bill:
The CERB may provide financial assistance to projects that will assist in retaining the state's
military-related private sector businesses. In addition, the Department of Community, Trade
and Economic Development (DCTED) may enter into an agreement with CERB to
implement the Small Business Incubator (SBI) program. The CERB may serve as the
DCTED's designee in making expenditures from the SBI account.
Appropriation: The sum of $2.25 million GF-S for FY 06; $2.25 million GF-S for FY 07.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The public infrastructure financed by CERB is valued by its public sector
partners and the private sector beneficiaries. This is due in great part to the responsiveness of
the program. Since 1992, the $92 million of CERB investment has created and retained
nearly 22,000 jobs, led to over $2.3 billion in actual private capital investment, and generated
an estimated $57.8 million in new annual state and local taxes. Being one of the state's best
economic development tools, the demand for CERB funding continues to surpass the
available funds; however, CERB lacks a sufficient permanent revenue source. This bill
would provide a bridge for the next biennium while waiting for a permanent revenue source
to be identified.
The language referencing the military-related industry does not expand the program as a
project would still need to be eligible to receive CERB funds; it merely sends a message to
the Department of Defense that we support our military-related industry. The bill also
authorizes CERB and DCTED to enter into an agreement regarding the administration of the
SBI program and funds. This is voluntary and would not change any of the requirements
governing the SBI program. It would merely save DCTED from setting up a separate
administrative structure to administer the SBI program and would lend the expertise of the
CERB members and staff to the SBI program.
(With concerns) There are concerns in the nonprofit small business incubator sector that the
requirements of the CERB program will be applied to the funding of the SBI program.
CERB does not distribute grants or loans to private nonprofits whereas many small business
incubators in Washington are private nonprofits.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Dara Fredericksen, Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development; Miland Walling, Community Economic Revitatization Board; Scott
Taylor, Washington Public Ports Association; Jim Rothlin, Port of Chehalis; Ron Newbry,
Washington Economic Development Association; and Rick Slunaker, Associated General
Contractors of Washington.
(In support with concerns) Jamie Beletz, Washington Association of Small Business
Incubators; and Bob Gee, Metropolitan Development Council.