HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1159
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Title: An act relating to limiting liability for persons who work with liquefied petroleum gas.
Brief Description: Limiting liability for persons working with liquefied petroleum gas.
Sponsors: Representatives Kirby and Priest.
Brief History:
Judiciary: 2/18/05, 3/2/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Williams, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Rodne, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Campbell, Kirby, Serben, Springer and Wood.
Staff: Trudes Tango Hutcheson (786-7384).
Background:
Liquefied petroleum gas includes propane, propylene, butane, and butylene or mixes of these
gases. The most commonly used of these gases, commercially and residentially, is propane.
In negligence actions involving propane, courts have recognized that certain substances, such
as gas, are dangerous, and that the degree of care to be exercised in its use should be
commensurate with its harmful nature. Reeder v. Western Gas & Power Co., 42 Wn.2d 542
(1953). Courts have also found that although a supplier of gas does not have the duty to
inspect equipment belonging to the homeowner/customer absent a contractual duty, if the
company has actual or constructive knowledge of a leak or defect, then the duty to investigate
may arise and breach of that duty may result in liability.
A person will be found to have constructive knowledge of a fact if, by exercising reasonable
care, the person should have known of the fact. Whether a person has constructive
knowledge is fact-specific and depends essentially on the situation at the time.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A person who sells at retail, supplies, handles, or transports liquefied petroleum gas is not
liable for civil damages for injury, wrongful death, or loss of property caused by the use of
equipment or an appliance when: (a) the equipment or appliance was being used in a manner
or for a purpose that was not intended or foreseeable and could not have been expected; and
(b) the use was without the person's actual or constructive knowledge.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill: (a) adds wrongful death actions to the actions from which a person is
immune; (b) grants immunity from damages caused by the use of equipment when the
equipment is being used in a manner that was not foreseeable and when the use was without
the actual or constructive knowledge of the person seeking immunity; and (c) removes the
provisions in the bill regarding immunity for persons following the National Fire Protection
Association standards and immunity regarding the installation, modification, and repair of
propane equipment.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: Civil liability creates an unfair burden on people who deal with propane.
The bill removes propane handlers from liability when another person fails to follow gas
code requirements or does repairs without the propane handler's knowledge.
(With concerns) The blanket immunity granted for anyone who follows the National Fire
Protection Association code should be removed. Product liability laws cover some of these
issues. The bill should be amended to include a propane handler having constructive
knowledge, not just actual knowledge.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Kirby, prime sponsor; and Tim Layton,
Northwest Propane Gas Association.
(With concerns) Michael Temple, Washington State Trial Lawyers' Association.