HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1262
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Title: An act relating to judicial compensation.
Brief Description: Limiting compensation for part-time judges.
Sponsors: Representatives Takko, Walsh, Blake and Wallace; by request of Board For Judicial Administration.
Brief History:
Judiciary: 2/1/05 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Flannigan, Vice Chair; Williams, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Campbell, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Kirby, Serben, Springer and Wood.
Staff: Bill Perry (786-7123).
Background:
For various reasons, temporary judges are sometimes used to hear cases in superior courts. In
order to sit as a judge pro tempore, a person must be either: (1) an attorney agreed upon by
the parties; (2) a sitting elected judge from another court; or (3) a superior court judge who
retires and continues to preside over a pending case.
Pay for superior court judges pro tempore varies depending on the pro tempore's status.
Some elected judges of courts of limited jurisdiction serve as part-time judges. The statute dealing with the salaries of superior court judges pro tempore does not explicitly address the payment of part-time judges who serve as judges pro tempore.
Summary of Bill:
The prohibition against active judges receiving compensation as judges pro tempore is
limited to active full-time judges. Active part-time judges may be compensated for time
spent as a pro tempore, but only if that time is not also being compensated for by the
part-time salary.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill addresses a problem in smaller rural counties. A superior court judge may need a pro tempore due to travel requirements, vacation, or illness. In smaller jurisdictions there may be no full-time municipal judges at all. Sometimes part-time judges are now sitting as pro-tempores without compensation.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Takko, prime sponsor; and Judge Joel Penoyar, Superior Court Judge.