HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1304
As Amended by the Senate
Title: An act relating to animal cruelty.
Brief Description: Revising provisions relating to animal cruelty.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Kessler, O'Brien, Lantz, Tom, Lovick, Pearson, Hunt, Moeller, Kirby, Kristiansen, Hunter, Condotta, Dunshee, Nixon, Springer, Jarrett, Simpson, Kilmer, Upthegrove, Williams, Linville, Kenney and Dickerson).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 2/2/05, 2/18/05 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/4/05, 96-0.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 4/14/05, 41-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Flannigan, Vice Chair; Williams, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Rodne, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Campbell, Kirby, Serben, Springer and Wood.
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
The state's law for the prevention of cruelty to animals prohibits certain practices and
activities involving animals. Among the law's prohibitions are transporting or confining
animals in an unsafe manner, engaging animals in exhibition fighting with other animals, and
poisoning animals. In addition, the chapter contains the crime of animal cruelty.
Animal cruelty in the first degree involves intentionally inflicting substantial pain on, causing
physical injury to, or killing an animal by a means that causes undue suffering. Animal
cruelty in the first degree is a class C felony.
Animal cruelty in the second degree is committed when a person knowingly, recklessly, or
with criminal negligence inflicts unnecessary suffering or pain upon an animal. An owner
may commit this crime by failing to provide necessary food, water, shelter, rest, or medical
attention, or by abandoning the animal. Animal cruelty in the second degree is a
misdemeanor.
Law enforcement agencies and animal care and control agencies may enforce the provisions
of the animal cruelty law. An animal control officer may issue a citation based on probable
cause but may not execute a search warrant without being accompanied by a law enforcement
officer. In addition, the animal control officer may not arrest a person for a violation, but
may request a law enforcement officer to make the arrest.
The animal cruelty law contains a number of exemptions, including: licensed research
institutions; accepted husbandry practices in the commercial raising or slaughtering of
livestock; the customary use of animals in rodeos or fairs; the killing of animals for food; and
practices authorized under the "game laws."
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The crime of first-degree animal cruelty is expanded to include a person who, with criminal
negligence, starves, dehydrates, or suffocates an animal, and as a result causes: (a) the animal
to suffer substantial and unjustifiable physical pain that extends for a period sufficient to
cause considerable suffering; or (b) death.
The crime of second-degree animal cruelty is amended to remove "depriving an animal of
necessary food, water, or ventilation" as a means of committing the crime.
EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S):
The Senate amendment raises the crime of animal fighting from a gross misdemeanor to a
class C felony and expands the crime to include a person who knowingly: (1) breeds, buys,
sells, or offers for sale any animal with the intent that the animal will be used for fighting; (2)
participates in, advertises, or performs a service in the furtherance of an animal fight; (3)
transports spectators to an animal fight or accepts payment for admission to an animal fight;
(5) uses a place, or allows a place to be used, for animal fighting; (6) serves as a stakeholder
for money wagered on an animal fight; and (7) takes or receives a stray or pet animal with the
intent of using the stray animal or pet animal for animal fighting or for training or baiting for
animal fighting.
The amendment removes the specific provision making it a crime to be a spectator at an
animal fight; however, participation in an animal fight is a violation of the offense.
The amendment defines "animal" for the purposes of the crime of animal fighting to mean a
dog or male chicken.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: There are people out there who neglect their animals to the point of real
cruelty. When these offenses happen they are truly horrific, and they don't fit within a
misdemeanor crime. By the time the neglect is discovered, it can take breathing apparatus to
enter the place. There was a recent puppy mill case where 100 dead or dying puppies were
found. It takes eight to 12 weeks to starve an animal to death. It is a painful and gruesome
process of death.
Because this behavior is currently only a misdemeanor, it is not being addressed. Law
enforcement officials have bigger fish to fry. This bill would give the law more teeth. These
cases can go on and on, and no one takes them seriously enough. Many of the offenders are
repeat offenders, and these people often treat their children the same way they treat their
animals.
The punishment needs to fit the crime. The bill requires criminal negligence. It does not
cover accidents. This bill doesn't affect livestock, rodeos or fairs, or research institutions.
These are already exempted under the animal cruelty law.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Kessler, prime sponsor; Susan Michaels, Pasados Safe Haven; Dr. Dana Bridges, Veterinarian; Ellen O'Neill-Stephens, King County Prosecuting Attorneys; Mark Steinway, Humane Investigator in Snohomish County; and Chris Cheney, Washington State Dairy Federation and Washington Fryer Commission.