HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1467
As Passed House:
March 8, 2005
Title: An act relating to mandatory reporting of abuse or neglect.
Brief Description: Requiring mandatory reporting of abuse or neglect of a child when discovered by a person connected with specified nonprofit entities.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Children & Family Services (originally sponsored by Representatives Dickerson, Wallace, P. Sullivan, Kagi, Roberts, Simpson, Appleton, Moeller, Green, Ericks, Takko and Chase).
Brief History:
Children & Family Services: 2/7/05, 2/14/05 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/8/05, 98-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Kagi, Chair; Roberts, Vice Chair; Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Walsh, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Darneille, Dickerson, Dunn, Haler and Pettigrew.
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
Washington law requires certain persons to report suspected child abuse or neglect to
authorities. These persons are called "mandatory reporters." Under current law, it is
mandatory that certain persons having reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered
abuse or neglect report the incident, or cause the incident to be reported, to the appropriate
law enforcement agency or the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). There are
a number of mandatory reporters listed in the current law.
The reporting requirement also extends to any adult who is able or capable of making a report
who has reasonable cause to believe that a child residing with the adult has suffered severe
abuse. An individual who is not a mandatory reporter is encouraged by statute to report
suspected child abuse or neglect to the proper law enforcement agency or the DSHS.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A person who is an employee or regular-service volunteer of a nonprofit entity who has
reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered abuse or neglect is required to report the
incident to the proper law enforcement agency or to the DSHS if the alleged perpetrator is an
employee, contractor, regular-service or occasional-service volunteer of the same nonprofit
entity.
The following definitions are created:
(a) "Volunteer" means any person who, of his or her own free will, provides goods or
services without any financial gain to any agency, instrumentality, political subdivision,
or school district of Washington.
(b) "Occasional-service volunteer" means any person who provides a one-time or
occasional volunteer service.
(c) "Regular-service volunteer" means any person engaged in specific volunteer service
activities on an ongoing or continuing basis.
An exception to the reporting requirement is added to exclude a member of the clergy from
having to report communications received solely as a result of a confession that is privileged
and required to be kept confidential by the church.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is
passed.
Testimony For: (In support, original bill) We have all heard reports of abuse at the hands of
volunteers, coaches, clergy and others who are working with kids. Twenty-five other states
require clergy to report suspected child abuse or neglect. This is not just a problem with
churches. Children will continue to suffer abuse and neglect unless we have a good strong
reporting system. Clergy used to be included in this bill until they were removed 30 years
ago. Child abuse and neglect are great risks to children and any effort to intervene earlier are
good for children. If we think a child is abused or neglected, we need to report it and bring in
qualified people to determine if there is actual abuse or neglect. We need to go further in
protecting children.
(With concerns, original bill) We are concerned about protecting the clergy-penitent privilege
and what is the definition of "volunteer." We need to be sure volunteers are trained on how
to follow the law.
Testimony Against: (On original bill) We are concerned with how broad the bill is and the impact it may have on the credibility of current mandatory reporters. There is a need to narrow the focus, but not the purpose. We need safeguards against false allegations. There aren't enough funds to enforce this bill.
Persons Testifying: (In support, original bill) Representative Dickerson, prime sponsor; Jim
Flynn, Flynn and Rollins families; Kevin Glacken-Coly, Children's Alliance; and Kristen
Rogers, Washington Council for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect.
(With concerns, original bill) Lonnie Johns-Brown, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault
Program; Wes Oltent, NorthWest Religious Liberty Association; Paul Benz, Lutheran Public
Policy and Washington Association of Churches; Donna Christensen, Catholic Conference;
and Laurie Lippold, Children's Home Society.
(Opposed, original bill) Jana Heyd, Society of Counsel Representing the Accused Person and
Public Defense; and Bob Higley, Washington Evangelicals for Responsible Government.