HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1934
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to assault of a peace officer with a projectile stun gun.
Brief Description: Increasing penalties for assaulting a peace officer with a stun gun.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections (originally sponsored by Representatives Lovick, Ahern, Dickerson, Santos, O'Brien, Williams, Simpson, Ericks and Chase).
Brief History:
Criminal Justice & Corrections: 2/24/05 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/8/05, 91-6.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 4/13/05, 44-0.
House Concurred.
Passed House: 4/19/05, 97-1.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CORRECTIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives O'Brien, Chair; Ahern, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Kagi, Kirby and Strow.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Darneille, Vice Chair; and Pearson, Ranking Minority Member.
Staff: Christopher Abbott (786-7119) and Yvonne Walker (786-7841).
Background:
Assault
In general, a person commits assault if he or she knowingly or intentionally batters another
person, attempts to do so, or causes apprehension of an immediate assault. There are four
degrees of assault. Simply assaulting another person is assault in the fourth degree (a gross
misdemeanor), but may be elevated to assault in the third degree (a class C felony with a
seriousness level of III) if the person assaults any of several categories of people carrying out
official duties including: law enforcement officers, firefighters, or transit workers.
The crimes of assault in the first and second degrees include seriously harmful conduct such
as harming an unborn quick child, knowingly exposing another to HIV, or assaulting another
with a deadly weapon. Assault in the second degree is a class B felony with a seriousness
level of IV and assault in the first degree is a class A felony with a seriousness level of XII.
Both offenses are strikes under Washington's "Three Strikes and You're Out" law where
persistent offenders are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Courts sentence defendants under the Sentencing Reform Act based on the seriousness level
of the offense and the offender's prior criminal history. For example, a first-time offender
committing a level IV offense would receive a presumptive sentence range of three to nine
months in jail, while the same offender committing a level XII offense would roughly receive
a seven to 10 year sentence in prison.
Assault of a law enforcement or peace officer with a projectile stun gun constitutes third
degree assault under most circumstances. If the stun gun was used under circumstances
where it was readily capable of inflicting substantial bodily harm, a court could consider it a
deadly weapon and its use may constitute second degree assault or a deadly weapon
sentencing enhancement.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Assault of a Peace Officer with a Projectile Stun Gun. The crime of assault in the third
degree, a nonviolent class C felony, is expanded to include assault of a peace officer with a
projectile stun gun. The seriousness level for assault with a stun gun is raised to a level IV,
equivalent to the seriousness level of assault in the second degree.
A projectile stun gun is defined as an electronic device that projects wired probes attached to
the device that emit an electrical charge and that is designed and primarily employed to
incapacitate a person or animal.
Projectile Stun Gun Study Committee. A Projectile Stun Gun Study Committee is
established to review the sale and use of projectile stun guns within Washington. The
committee shall be composed of:
two senators, one from each caucus in the Senate;two representatives, one from each caucus in the House of Representatives;one police chief and one elected sheriff appointed by the Washington Association of
Sheriffs and Police Chiefs;one representative appointed by the Association of Washington Cities;one representative appointed by the Washington State Association of Counties; andone representative appointed by the Department of Health.
The committee is responsible for evaluating public safety issues created by projectile stun
guns and must make recommendations regarding whether they should be regulated.
Specifically, the committee must review the following issues:
Public safety issues related to projectile stun guns when used by the general public.Ownership limitations, such as age and criminal record restrictions.The practicality of requiring criminal background checks prior to allowing the purchase
of a projectile stun gun and who would perform such criminal background checks.Manufacturing requirements, such as voltage limits and whether to require that projectile
stun guns disperse traceable coded materials.What use and possession limitations should be placed on projectile stun guns.Whether mandatory training should be required to purchase a projectile stun gun.What penalties shall be assessed to individuals that unlawfully sell, possess, or use
projectile stun guns.The feelings of the general public about the use of projectile stun guns as an alternative to
traditional firearms as means of self-protection.Any other issue the committee finds relevant to the regulation of projectile stun guns in
Washington.
Staff support is provided by Senate Committee Services and the Office of Program Research.
Legislative members of the study committee are to be reimbursed for travel expenses.
Nonlegislative members, except those representing an employer or organization, are also
entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses. A committee report, containing findings and
proposed legislation, if any, must be delivered to the full Legislature, not later than December
31, 2005.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill was inspired by the "taser demonstration" held last year by Chief Gil Kerlikowske, Seattle Police Department and Carl Mack, President of the Seattle/King County branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The incapacitating effect of stun guns could endanger law enforcement and the state should act to prevent police officers from getting shocked by stun guns.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Lovick, prime sponsor; and James McMahan, Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.