HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2073
As Amended by the Senate
Title: An act relating to juvenile sentencing alternatives.
Brief Description: Revising juvenile sentencing alternatives.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Law (originally sponsored by Representatives Dickerson, Moeller and Chase).
Brief History:
Juvenile Justice & Family Law: 2/28/05, 3/2/05 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/9/05, 96-0.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 4/13/05, 47-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUVENILE JUSTICE & FAMILY LAW
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Dickerson, Chair; Moeller, Vice Chair; McDonald, Ranking Minority Member; McCune, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse, Lovick and Roberts.
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
A juvenile offender who is adjudicated of an offense may be given a sentence by the court
based on the statutorily available sentencing options. The majority of the sentences imposed
by the juvenile court are standard range sentences. Standard range sentences are calculated
based on a grid system using the offender's prior criminal history and the seriousness of the
current offense.
If the court finds that a standard range sentence is not appropriate in a specific case the court
may impose a statutorily available alternative sentence. In 2003, ESSB 5903 was enacted
and created several new sentencing options, including the Mental Health Disposition
Alternative (MHDA).
The MHDA permits a court to impose a suspended sentence based upon the offender's
compliance with mental health treatment. The eligibility requirements for the sentencing
alternative are as follows:
A juvenile offender is ineligible for the MHDA if he or she is convicted of a sex or violent
offense.
If the court imposes the MHDA, the court will impose a sentence including confinement up
to 65 weeks. The court will suspend the sentence, place the juvenile on community
supervision for up to one year, require participation in treatment interventions, and impose
one or more local sanctions. Local sanctions may include requirements such as up to 30 days
of confinement in the detention facility, community service, payment of fines, or probation
requirements such as attending school and curfew.
If the juvenile fails to comply with the terms of the MHDA the court may impose sanctions,
or may revoke the MHDA and impose the original sentence.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The eligibility requirements for the Mental Health Disposition Alternative (MHDA) are
changed. The requirement that the juvenile offender be subject to a standard range sentence
between 15 and 65 weeks is eliminated. A juvenile may now be eligible for the disposition
alternative if he or she receives a Department of Social and Health Services Juvenile
Rehabilitation Administration (JRA) commitment sentence of any length.
The offenses which are ineligible for the sentencing alternative are changed. An offender
who is adjudicated of any of the following offenses is ineligible for the disposition
alternative:
EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S):
The amendment deletes "violent" offenses, other than those listed in the bill, from the list of
offenses that are ineligible for the MHDA. Manslaughter in the second degree is added to the
list of offenses that are ineligible for the MHDA. Language is added requiring the Juvenile
Rehabilitation Administration to pay the costs incurred by the juvenile courts for mental
health and psychiatric evaluations, as well as for supervision and treatment costs, subject to
funds appropriated for this purpose.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill is designed to expand the eligibility for the Disposition Alternative. It expands the eligibility by allowing more offenses to be eligible so long as they don't involve a deadly weapon or the infliction of bodily harm. It is cost effective to have research-based programs in the community. It saves the state money. The drop in crime rates indicate that these programs are doing well. We can do more under this bill. In 2004, we only used it for five kids, but we can quadruple this number and it would be a significant savings to the state.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Dickerson, prime sponsor; and Bruce Knutson, Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators.