HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2675
As Reported by House Committee On:
State Government Operations & Accountability
Title: An act relating to disclosure of certain Native American cultural resources information.
Brief Description: Exempting certain Native American cultural resources information from public disclosure.
Sponsors: Representatives B. Sullivan, Buck, Dunn, McCoy, Moeller and Lantz; by request of Archaeology and Historic Preservation.
Brief History:
State Government Operations & Accountability: 1/31/06, 2/1/06 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ACCOUNTABILITY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Haigh, Chair; Green, Vice Chair; Nixon, Ranking Minority Member; Clements, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hunt, McDermott, Miloscia, Schindler and Sump.
Staff: Stephanie Toby (786-7106).
Background:
Records, maps, or other information identifying the location of archaeological sites are
exempt from public disclosure.
Watershed Analysis
The Forest and Fish Report, instigated by the Forest Practices Board (Board), was negotiated
with diverse interest groups and has the support of key federal agencies. The report was
released in 1999 and directs the Board to adopt rules for policies, including a watershed
analysis system.
Watershed analysis is a biological and physical assessment of a watershed designed to
address the cumulative effects of forest practices on specific public resources and on cultural
resources. This process was developed by forest landowners, tribes, environmental groups
and state natural resources agencies. Based on assessment results, voluntary management
strategies are developed to protect and manage cultural resources. Watershed analysis is
performed on Watershed Administrative Units (WAUs), which are defined by hydrology and
geomorphology. There are 825 WAUs in Washington.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Records, maps, and other information acquired during watershed analysis that identifies the
location of archaeological sites, historic sites, artifacts, or the sites of traditional religious,
ceremonial or social uses and activities of affected Indian tribes are exempt from disclosure
to prevent the looting or depredation of such sites.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The phrase "cultural resources" is removed, and the list "archaeological sites, historic sites,
artifacts, or the sites of traditional religious, ceremonial or social uses and activities of
affected indian tribes" is inserted in its place.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect July 1, 2006.
Testimony For: (In support) There is a problem with amateur archaeologists taking
inappropriate items from sites, and this has caused a terrible situation for Native American
tribes. This bill does allow for appropriate disclosures to agencies. This bill gives tribes a
safe and secure way to communicate with the state and with landowners about the cultural
areas that are important to them. It is completely voluntary on the part of the landowner to
decide on protection strategies for the resources and to forward those strategies to the
Department of Natural Resources. The term "cultural resources" was left broad on purpose
because the Department of Archaeology and Historical Preservation did not feel it was their
place to tell the tribes what constitutes a cultural resource. This bill increases the likelihood
that these important analyses will take place and increases confidence among participants to
share sensitive information.
(In support with amendment) There is a definition of "cultural resources" in the WAC. The
activities listed in the definition are open ended and this could cause problems. It is a good
idea to keep the bill restricted to the Forest Practices Act for now until further implications
are understood.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Sullivan, prime sponsor; Allyson Brooks,
Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation; Leonard Young, Department of Natural
Resources; and Bill Garvin, Washington Forest Protection Agency.
(In support with amendment) Rowland Thompson, Allied Daily Newspapers.