HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2939
As Reported by House Committee On:
Technology, Energy & Communications
Title: An act relating to creation of the energy freedom program.
Brief Description: Establishing the energy freedom program.
Sponsors: Representatives Grant, Dunshee, Linville, Kessler, Upthegrove, Kilmer, Ericks, Hasegawa, P. Sullivan, Santos, Green, Springer, Conway, Simpson and Hudgins.
Brief History:
Technology, Energy & Communications: 1/17/06, 1/26/06 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY & COMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Morris, Chair; Kilmer, Vice Chair; Crouse, Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ericks, Hankins, Hudgins, Nixon, P. Sullivan, Sump, Takko and Wallace.
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
Oil Production and Consumption in the U.S.
According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2002, the United States
consumed 19.656 million barrels of petroleum (crude oil and petroleum products) per day, or
about one-quarter of total world oil production. More than half (62 percent) was imported
oil. The EIA has projected that by 2025, total petroleum consumption in the U.S. will be
approximately 28.3 million barrels per day.
While consumption of petroleum in the United States is increasing, oil production has been
decreasing steadily since 1970. According to the EIA Annual Energy Outlook for 2004, U.S.
petroleum production is expected to decrease slightly from 9.2 million barrels per day in
2002 to 8.6 million barrels per day by 2025, while consumption is expected to rise from 19.6
barrels per day in 2002 to 28.3 million per day by 2024, which represents approximately a 44
percent increase in consumption.
State Loan Programs for Renewable Energy
According to a study conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, there are at
least 22 active loan programs in 19 states that provide low-cost financing for renewables.
Funding for loan programs in these states varies. Some programs are funded by revolving
loan funds, while others are funded through annual appropriations, the sale of bonds, or air-quality noncompliance penalty fees. More recently established programs such as those in
New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin are funded by a system benefits charge. Total funding for
state loan programs varies as well, with some programs operating with as little as $200,000
per year, while others lend up to $200 million per year.
State Expenditure Limit
Initiative 601, enacted by the voters in 1993, established a limitation on state general fund
expenditures. Adjustments to the expenditure limit may be made for several reasons: (1) the
limit increases each year by the fiscal growth factor, which is population growth added to
inflation; (2) the limit is also adjusted, or re-based, each year based on actual expenditures;
and (3) the limit is adjusted either up or down if moneys or programs are transferred either to
or from the General Fund.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Energy Freedom Program is established. The stated legislative purpose of the Energy
Freedom Program is to stimulate strategic investment in facilities, infrastructure,
technologies, and research and development that will advance Washington's move towards
energy independence.
Energy Freedom Board
The Energy Freedom Board (Board) is created. Membership of the Board consists of 13
individuals: the director of the Department of Agriculture or the director's designee; the
director of the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (DCTED) or
the director's designee from the DCTED's energy policy division; four members of the
Legislature who serve on committees with jurisdiction over energy issues; and seven
members appointed by the Governor, including one recognized expert in renewable energy,
one representative from Washington State University, one Washington state grower, one
producer of alternative fuels, one public fleet manager, one public buildings manager, and
one sustainable society advocate.
Staff support for the Board must be provided by DCTED. Members of the Board are
appointed to staggered terms of two, three, or four years in duration and may be reappointed
to serve more than one term.
Powers and Duties of the Board:
The Board is authorized to accept gifts, grants, or loan of funds or property from any source,
so long as accepting the funds is not a conflict of interest.
The Board will develop criteria for low-interest loan or grant awards that may be given to
political subdivisions of the state. The Board will also establish a competitive process for
awarding low-interest loans and grants, including a peer review process involving Board
members, renewable energy specialists, scientists, energy conservation specialists, and
individuals with recognized expertise.
Financial assistance may be awarded by the Board for any of the following types of projects
and activities:
Applicants for loans and grants must specify deliverables. Applications must be prioritized based on the following criteria:
Upon receiving financial assistance from the Board, political subdivisions must enter into
appropriate contracts with any industry partners involved in a funded project.
Energy Freedom Account
The Energy Freedom Account (Account) is created in the state treasury. Funds from the
Account may only be spent after appropriation. Expenditures may be used only for loans and
grants to political subdivisions for renewable energy and biofuel development projects and
activities. Administrative costs are limited to 1 percent of the available funds in the Account.
Beginning July 1, 2006, for four fiscal years through June 30, 2010, the state treasurer shall
transfer the sum of $25 million dollars each fiscal year from the State General Fund to the
Energy Freedom Account established in Section 8 of this Act, for a total of $100 million.
These funds are appropriated from the Energy Freedom Account to the DCTED for the
purposes of this Act.
The Energy Freedom Program expires June 30, 2016.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Additional findings are added to the intent section. The legislative membership on the
Energy Freedom Board (Board) is modified to specify that legislative members must come
from the House and Senate committees with jurisdiction over energy issues. The substitute
adds that the report to the Legislature from the Board must include a description of each
funded project's status; a description of each project's agricultural and environmental
benefits; and a description of the progress made by each project in creating jobs and moving
towards energy independence. The substitute adds that applications for loans and grants must
specify deliverables. Criteria are added to the substitute bill by which the Board must
prioritize applications. Political subdivisions receiving financial assistance under this bill are
required to enter into appropriate contracts with industry partners involved in funded projects.
Administrative costs are limited to 1 percent of available funds in the Energy Freedom
Account. The appropriation of State General Funds is changed from $100 million to $25
million per year for four consecutive fiscal years beginning July 1, 2006, and ending June 30,
2010. The account name is changed from "Energy Freedom Loan Account" to "Energy
Freedom Account."
Appropriation: The sum of $25 million from the Energy Freedom Loan Account is appropriated to the DCTED for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2006.
Fiscal Note: Fiscal note requested on substitute on January 26, 2006.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed, except for sections 1 through 11 and section 15, relating to the Energy Freedom Program and the state expenditure limit, which takes effect July 1, 2006, and section 12, relating to the state expenditure limit, which takes effect July 1, 2007.
Testimony For: The Energy Freedom Program is timely. Our state's energy supply is in flux; prices will only continue to go up. There needs to be research funds to explore alternative energy sources. We need to subsidize all forms of energy. These loan programs will encourage the development of these alternative energy industries in the state. All of these biofuel bills have common goals: energy independence; growing and diversifying a rural economy; keeping economic benefits in the state. This loan program will help fund the crushing infrastructure for biodiesel.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Dunshee; Jim Armstrong, Spokane County Conservation District; John Plaza, Seattle Biofuels; Jay Gordon, Washington State Dairy Federation; and Dave Warren, Washington Public Utility Districts Association.