HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 5730
As Reported by House Committee On:
State Government Operations & Accountability
Title: An act relating to regulation of small businesses.
Brief Description: Reducing the impact of administrative rules on small businesses.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on International Trade & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Doumit, Zarelli, Eide, Shin, Rasmussen and Mulliken).
Brief History:
State Government Operations & Accountability: 3/22/05, 4/1/05 [DP].
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ACCOUNTABILITY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Haigh, Chair; Green, Vice Chair; Nixon, Ranking Minority Member; Clements, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; McDermott and Miloscia.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 1 member: Representative Hunt.
Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).
Background:
Under the Regulatory Fairness Act (RFA), an agency must develop a small business
economic impact statement (SBEIS) if a rule it is adopting under the Administrative
Procedures Act will impose more than minor costs on businesses in an industry or if the
agency is ordered to do so by the Joint Administrative Rules Review Committee (JARRC).
The RFA defines "industry" as all of the businesses in the state in any one four-digit standard
industrial classification as published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, unless use of the
four-digit classification would violate state confidentiality laws, in which case all of the
businesses in a three-digit standard industrial classification. The RFA does not define "minor
costs."
An agency does not have to develop a SBEIS if a similar analysis was already conducted
pursuant to the significant legislative rulemaking process or if the rule is:
A SBEIS must contain a variety of information, including:
If the SBEIS shows that a rule will have a disproportionate impact on small businesses, the
agency must, where legal and feasible, reduce the costs imposed by the rule on small
businesses. Methods the agency may use to do this include: reducing, modifying, or
eliminating substantive requirements; simplifying, reducing, or eliminating recordkeeping
and reporting requirements; reducing the frequency of inspections; or reducing or modifying
the fine schedule for noncompliance. The SBEIS must list the steps taken to reduce the costs
on small businesses or a reasonable justification for not doing so.
When any rule is proposed for which a SBEIS is required, the proposing agency must provide
notice to small businesses using either of the following methods: direct notification or
notification in publications likely to be obtained by small businesses affected by the rule.
Summary of Bill:
"Minor cost" is defined as a cost per business that is less than three-tenths of one percent of
one hundred dollars in sales, or less than one-tenth of one percent of annual payroll. The
definition of "industry" is expanded a four digit or three digit standard industrial
classification as published by the North American Industry Classification System.
The analysis of compliance costs in a SBEIS must include the costs of professional services.
Based on any disproportionate impact on small businesses, agencies are required to
"maximally" reduce the costs imposed by a rule on small businesses. Agencies are required
to consider all the methods for reducing the impact on small businesses that are listed in
statute, including mitigation techniques suggested by small businesses or their advocates. If
the agency determines that it cannot reduce the costs, the agency must provide a clear
explanation of why it has made that determination in its filing for proposed rulemaking.
When any rule is proposed for which a SBEIS is required, the proposing agency must provide
notice to small businesses using all three of the following methods: direct notification,
notification in publications likely to be obtained by small businesses affected by the rule, and
notification on the agency's web site.
The JARRC must establish a small business advisory board to ensure that small business
concerns are reflected in the rules review process.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The cost and complexity of rules and regulations is a major burden on small businesses. There is much in this bill that would be helpful to small businesses. The small business economic impact statement process should be strengthened. Agencies must be required to reduce the adverse impacts of their rules on small businesses.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Gary Smith, Independent Businesses Association; and Carolyn Logue, National Federation of Independent Businesses.